Redleg

Sheezel and Phillipou.

Forget both. Bombers will take Phillipou and Roos Sheezel. If Bombers don’t Hawks will. Bombers would want 13 and both our F1 picks knowing Dodoro.

We are nothing if we cannot learn. I just made that up. I might try and get a job with one of those desk calendar companies, that have the thought of the day printed under the date. Just to leave you all with another, “ the draft is more than just a breeze, spelled differently “. Ruminate on that one today.

What kind of Demonlander are you?

If we are chasing a top 5 pick ,then he is probably not on our radar.

You are confused Uncle, as no one has claimed pick 19 is better than 13, yet.

We may have achieved what we intended: utter confusion.

It could be the cinnamon on top.

Me thinks you are carrying a secret torch for Uncle and you are just trying to put us all off the scent. Remember the old saying, “I think you protesteth too much”.

North will keep 2 and 3. So that likely is not happening. It’s someone else.

I am not suffering from scurvy, probably because I drink lemon juice.

Not being very good at maths, can I ask if 24 hours is up.

Correct.

If we have identified a player we want and we can trade up for him, do it.

That could be problematic, as it has been suggested that Giants may want George. If they don’t, then 19 might get him, if that’s who we want. We could even get an earlier pick from Giants if they don’t want him and we promised to take him with the earlier pick. It would cost us 37 and F1st. My info is that Giants want Gruzewski at around 19 so it’s interesting. We do have a good relationship with the Giants clearing Toby and Preuss recently. If it was to happen, I wonder if it would be an on the night trade, when they know exactly who is still available.

Yes, the climate will change.

And they will get what they want.

Penn, I suggested Jefferson and George would be a great draft for our future quite a while ago. We would get one at 13, but not the other at 37. A trade up of 37 would be needed using a Future pick. What do you think about that scenario? Our need for another key forward is obvious to us all and Jefferson appears to be the next best after Cadman. If JT agrees that is probably it. George is the touted game changer who will be out next season, who but for injury, could have been too 5-10. It is a chance to get him lower than his value if we really want him and can get a trade up done. It wouldn’t be easy. The other alternative is take one and whoever at 37.

And one of those was not wanted at the time.

If we did that we would probably not get Jefferson, George or Allan, if that’s who we are looking at. IMO if we trade up, it will be by using 37 and a future pick. I can’t see us trading 13, as that would get us the players named, except maybe Allan.

I can’t see any way we will go for a ruckman with pick 13, given our current situation, with just adding Grundy, Schache and a Rookie. We also have Tom Mac back and a father son in a couple of years to develop. We can always add an experienced Rookie if needed in the next couple of years.

I am nothing if not succinct.

Tell ‘em Goffy.

.

On the right track.