CHF
Members-
Posts
1,295 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
CHF last won the day on November 6 2020
CHF had the most liked content!
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
CHF's Achievements
Redleg (4/10)
2.7k
Reputation
-
Welcome to Demonland: Aidan Johnson
CHF replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Trade, Draft & Free Agency
I don’t mind a pick like this. I have to believe that JT knows his business. Mature age, country boy and a bit rough around the edges that has finally been given a crack at the big time. I am sure he will give it everything and not die wondering. He plays for my team and good luck to him.- 167 replies
-
- 12
-
THE 2024 AFL NATIONAL DRAFT - DAY ONE
CHF replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Trade, Draft & Free Agency
My thoughts as well. I am surprised that Allan dropped a bit. I do hope that we are keeping in touch with the ones that were interested in before the draft. Dropping players like Tauru, Hotton, Smith, Faull, Hynes and Armstrong an email or call to congratulate them and let them know were will be watching their development with interest. -
I am hearing a couple of very quiet whispers, but not sure if it is really solid information or wishful thinking. * Very unlikely North will trade out of pick 2 unless they get a once in a generation deal and given the depth of the draft I think that is a long shot. * Consensus is that Lalor will be Richmond's first pick However would not surprise if Smith was the first named called. If they did go that way then I would expect Allen to be called at their pick 7. * Ashcroft to be bid on by either North or Carlton to keep Brisbane honest. * Believe that MFC rate Langford higher than Tauru. * If Allen is not there at MFC second pick I would not be surprised to hear us calling Hotton out. * Smillie may slide to mid teens. No idea why. Based on these unverifiable rumours I see a couple of different outcomes. Likely..... 1. Richmond: Lalor 2. North: Smith 3. Carlton: O'Sullivan 4. Adelaide: Draper 5. Melbourne: Langford 6. Richmond: Tauru 7. St Kilda: Allen 8. St Kilda: Travaglia 9. Melbourne: Lindsey/Reid/Hotton Possible... 1. Richmond: Smith 2. North:Lalor 3. Carlton: O'Sullivan 4. Adelaide: Draper 5. Melbourne: Langford 6. Richmond: Allen 7. St Kilda: Tauru 8. St Kilda: Travaglia 9. Melbourne: Lindsey/Reid/Hotton
-
Training reports..... Season fixture published..... a couple of steps towards the real thing. With regards the fixture, i do not have any problems with it. A good run for the first 9 rounds that give us a chance to be at the pointy end of the table and to get good exposure in the second half of the season. An interesting run with three interstate games in 4 weeks with the bye between the first and second of those games. I am sure the powers that be are working out how to tackle that. Last 7 rounds in Melbourne with the Pies last up. That ids not bad. My early prediction is that we make the 8 and push for the top 4. If we have a similar run of injuries in preseason and in the season as we had this last season then we, or any other team in a similar situation, is in trouble.
-
Ahhhhh a training report..... that can only mean that the real thing is a step closer.
-
I think we have to be realistic about what has been said in Green’s letter. He does say at the beginning that what follows is high level information and that some things need to be kept in confidence. As to finding out the results of the review, I think we will see responses to the detail of the review in the next couple of months. There will be an extensive redefining of roles and responsibilities within the football operations side of the club as well as the same thing happening on the administration side. Deciding to have these reviews is one thing, structuring and carrying them out properly is another element but the most important thing is understanding the information and outcomes and reacting in the best way.
-
IF... ....Damian Barrett has any integrity as an AFL journalist.... THEN... ...He would apologise for his biased reporting with regard to what has transpired at the MFC over the last few weeks.
-
Read the club by club reviews of trading and some pertinent comments about different club's trading were made, However, when it came to MFC, the whole blurb was to do with the rubbish that had been going on the the last month or so. Nothing really about the fact that we have a couple of first round picks in the first 10. Also started reporting on what the situation might be in 12 months time with Pickett, Petracca and Oliver. That has very little to do with our performance in this trade period, except to say that we have done very well to retain these three players for next season, added a couple of depth players to cover holes and got two excellent first round picks in a deep draft.
-
I think that we are in a position that if he is not picked up in the next couple of days he could be picked up at a later stage as a UFA by any club. We could make him a contract offer at any time a I understand it.
-
If we do not get Derksen in this trade period I would keep Tomlinson.
-
Damn, it would be a hard gig on trade radio so far this trade period. Not sure what else to expect though. Not a lot of prospects in the market this year for trade, either buying or selling. A high quality draft crop and mid level talent on the trade table. All the teams want to get into the draft as early as possible and as often as possible. In my book that leads to high price tags on any that are traded. For the MFC I do not see us doing much in the trade week. ANB to Adelaide, Campbell in and maybe a couple of steak knives shuffles but I expect us to retain and use pick 5 and try to get into a position for a late first round selection. As to the Oliver situation I think it is as much a result of the lack of trades so far as anything else. I think he will line up for us next season along with Petracca. With not a lot else to talk about the AFL Media is driving this for all it is worth. Give me a break.... I read a headline that said Oliver has a dream of playing for Geelong.
-
Who is this 'Sam Manure' and why should I bother with him?
-
The "Dude" being Moore putting Petracca's life on the line.
-
It is as I thought. No definitive statement from either the player or the club until the talking is done and there is a resolution as such that looks to close the chapter. Keep in mind that the story has not been written or completed just the latest chapter. For a number of years now I have accepted that the AFL is a professional sport where the players have a limited time to maximise their earnings and set themselves up for their post playing lives. Accepting that I have to accept all that goes with it Including the last few weeks of discussion and conjecture about Petracca's future. It is the way it is. I also have to say that I support the MFC team and not just individual players. As with all of us, I have favorite players but it is the team I support. I think that there were faults on both sides of the table and in hindsight both sides would have handled it a bit differently. However, I take the statements from the club and the player at face value for the time being until words and actions tell me differently. I expect that the club and the player will act with professionalism from now, through the pre-season and into next season. No matter what Petracca might think or feel he will need to be ultra professional to get back to playing the standard of football he knows he is capable of. Either to get the MFC back into contention or to showcase his ability to potential suitors. I hope both sides take lessons from this and not 'learnings'. P.S. I would not be surprised to see Petracca spending more time operating out of the midfield next season than he did this last season.
-
I'm sorry... O do not understand. Kate doesn't know what? Kate answered the question regarding her contact with Petracca and his family. I do not believe she need to know of every contact that was made.