Gibberish

I wish I was still under 30! I don't think that the monetary value was ludicrous, but it is a significant amount. It was probably around the mark given his out put up to that point. But if there were behavioural issues then surely we would have had some first hand knowledge. Why didn't we add some performance or behavioural elements to a contract of that size? If there were off field issues why was he continually picked each week, even despite his, at times, lack of conditioning. These are some of the failings I am eluding to. I don't know of his off field troubles, I don't know anyone involved with the club. I'm only judging him on what he has achieved on the field for our club. He brought a lot of success in his time and, as a player, I'll miss seeing him run around in the red and blue.

I'm finding some of the comments on this thread quite unpalatable. Maybe it's a coping mechanism for some but I will miss Oliver and wish him the best. The circumstance I see is more a reflection of the failings of our previous administration. He didn't hand out his own contract. Good luck Clarry, just don't play too well when you play us. As an aside I wonder if we've created some salary cap space where we can possibly front end what he's owed, so we don't have this black hole in our cap in future years.

I agree!

Whilst I'm more confident in the upcoming new era (Coach, CEO, President) I still can't wrap my head around paying close to 10% of our cap in 5 years time for players that won't be on our list (Oliver, Brayshaw). Let alone $3.5 million over the next 5 years for Oliver to play at another club. Surely we've seen enough cautionary tales at other clubs recently to start attaching behavioural clauses to these large contracts. I can't shake the idea that the previous administration was drinking their own bathwater. Have these incidents and behaviours only reared their ugly head since signing the contract? No warning signs?

I don't mind that he's gone to the Roos where he has a family connection. I see a lot of other free agent compensation has been announced. Do we know what we get for Spargs and does that effect possibly having to trade for Mihocek? I think from memory we were the only club to take a net free agency compensation pick rather than trading for the incoming player and not diluting the compo pick.

My bad, I may have been thinking of the restricted free agent rules.

I don't think he qualifies as a free agent. Trade or delist if we don't offer him another contract.

Well I hope you will continue to post whatever it is you decide is relevant @Ghostwriter . I only have a personal opinion so I appreciate anything you are willing to share from your interactions. My sincere hope is that you are correct and that McVee has already agreed to terms. Not just that it would be disappointing for you to be on the receiving end of some deceiving information but that it would be detrimental to us to lose a known commodity and consistent senior player.

It is difficult for me to advocate for any of the candidates based on any sort of history or criteria. Can we really say for certain what they are bringing to the table? Simpson was quite enlightening talking about his process to becoming the WCE coach. He said that every club had this and that and that he focused on the 10% difference that he could bring to the club, LEADERSHIP. We all want a coach that can make the best of our list. Wether that is a coach with senior coaching experience or an well credentialed assistant. Edit: Some grammar.

Life is subjective. It's hard to compare eras. Money and professionalism alone can have such a profound impact on one generation to another. Most of our premierships were before my time. Neitz was my favorite player before our most recent success and, as much as I still admire him, it's hard to deny Gawn and his consistent impact on each and every game. I did name my little pooch MAXine for a reason!

Early 2000s was my favourite era, so nice to see some father sons and daughters coming through. Gives me a warm fuzzy feeling inside and a unpleasant realisation of my own vintage.

I mean do we really have enough depth in the half forward position? Footy smarts and AFL level players are a rarity, look at where we are after losing Jordan, Harmes et al. We've gone from a wealth of depth to the impoverished in a short few years. He may be a victim of our insipid forward craft, there's many players that lack speed but make up for it with good decisions and poise. Let's not be so dismissive of his talents while he's on our list. The romanticist in me doesn't mind him hooking up with his fathers team but we should consider keeping proven depth players and focusing more on developing players.

I actually think that Buckley is not the safe choice. It would be safer to pick an unknown. There's more expectation on picking someone like Buckley as opposed to an untried assistant. His standing in the football world, senior coaching experience and media presence puts him front and centre for criticism. I'm on the fence where it comes to Buckley's appointment, but he has been reflective enough of his shortcomings as a senior coach. Let's say he is driven instead of egotistical and it gives us a totally different perspective. I'm somewhat disappointed that Enright has withdrawn from the race but that is based on my own knowledge of him as a player and the media reports of him as an assistant coach.

A top second half team could indicate being blown away in the first half and junk time goals in the second half when the win is out of reach. We've had a lot of poor starts and poor finishes, seemed like when we tried to focus on fixing something another element of our games dropped off. I've seen a few key indicators used to show our supposed improvements or that our ladder position isn't truly reflective of our team. But not being able to put together enough four quarter efforts is no small thing and puts us squarely where we stand now.

AQPxR-7Lk3yEIzVYx13PnFZQf43mC42oOgz4sSIPsF8BH7cNAPpPow3uhhLxvAmuZrwSoNj7MG4kkwg-qxVz0_OH95vcybHnsSCM3NJJtA.mp4