Chook

How the HELL is Clint Bartram left to defend Dean Cox? Absolute shite defence from the Dees. The only one who wanted to compete was one of the littlest guys on the ground. And THAT is why Clint Bartram won't be dropped any time soon. Because he does what everyone is capable of doing but too few Demons are willing to do.

It's amazing. You can full-blown shove someone in the side, but you can't feathertouch them in the back.

Forget gold coast and GWS. We are a legitimate chance to finish on the bottom of the ladder. No tanking required.

Forget gold coast and GWS. We are a legitimate chance to finish on the bottom of the ladder. No tanking required.

Nobody's blaming Clark for our poor performance. He's the least of our worries. Our poor disposal is the number one problem across the entire ground, and that's what we need to fix. But instead we spent the entire summer running with not a ball in sight. Compared to last year at the corresponding game, our kicking is just as bad. That means that an entire year has gone by with absolutely no improvement in the most fundamental skill required of a FOOTballer. Not good enough from Bailey, and not good enough from the players.

I don't care what we're paying him. I just care what he's good at. And he's not good at marking the ball in a contested situation. Ruckman are damn important, so we should swap Jamar for Clark. Jamar can mark the ball better, and Clark is of far more use around the ground.

Clark is more of a big bodied midfielder or crumber than a forward. He'd be awesome in the ruck, but for some reason, we're not playing him there.

I've yet to see Mitch Clark take a contested mark. He is not a forward. The only times we look deadly is when we're doing the Dean Bailey run through the middle. I don't know what to make of this.

Frawley's really been terrible today. Given away three goals.

What's that? Seven high tackles now?

Good passage of play, Melbourne. Good kicking from Magner opened up the field. No leading mark though. I'd like to see one of those before I die.

Out of Bounds on the full count: 5 This is doing my goddamn head in!

Not my fault you don't know how to read. 3 OOB, 4 Head High. Onya Jonesy!!!

Out of Bounds on the full count: 4

7 from head-high tackles or OOB. It's not the umpires' fault we don't know how to kick or tackle.

I thought Kennedy would destroy Rivers, but that has not happened. Out of Bounds count: 3 Head High tackle count: 4 Totally unnecessary and detrimental to our performance. Frustrating as all hell, too. Best that quarter: Rivers, Jones, McDonald, Bennell. Worst: Green, Clark, Macdonald, Frawley (just for his brainfades).

There's another one. We're up to 3 now.

Lots of out of bounds on the full was our problem in the corresponding game last year. I reckon we'll have about 7-8 this week too.

You want to tackle below the shoulders Melbourne?

James Frawley is never guilty of bouncing the ball when he doesn't need to, which is great. But for god's sake bounce it sometimes!!

Who needs big forwards when you have Lynden Dunn to kick goals from outside fifty?

Anyone who reckons Mitch Clark is a forward just needs to look at the way he failed to take that mark all alone inside the fifty. He had the opportunity of just sticking the knee in the face of the defender and taking the easy mark. Of course he didn't do it, because he's not a natural forward.

Appropriately pessimistic.

Mistake to make Bate the sub. Great to see Tom McDonald. Why is Stef out? Injury? Wasn't he in the rehab group this week?

What is this thread short for? JWICGAW means . . .?