rpfc

We are talking different Whites.' I meant Jesse. Creates a spill, decent kick, and I would prefer him being mauled in the sqaure than Green, Jurrah, or Watts.

Brown isn't great, but he uses his frame more than PJ does. He acts on the field as if he is 2 feet smaller and 20 kilos lighter. I don't want to put up with it anymore, frankly. I want a White/Clark type. But if we can't secure one then i guess it's 'here we go again' with PJ.

We are massive sh!t stirrers, DC. Give it a rest. We done.

We'll see how they go during trade week...

I am to an extent, but Green doesn't bring into play Wonna or any crumbers that a big lump would. Bailey is the one superkeen for it. And he think he is onto something. I agree with having an effective lump. It's just the best way to provide Jamar with a break but have a decent ruck aswell as a decent forward. He's trying to kill to positions with the one player (to bastardise a metaphor).

Visy.

JFK? No need to go that far afield. Josh Kennedy isn't even related to Josh Kennedy.

Jurrah, Petterd, Watts, Green, and this extra 'around the ground' forward ruckman would fall over each other. I've heard Bailey talk about this a few times and I think his head is at a big, FP/FF that can swap with Jamar for 10 mins a quarter. Provide a stay at home target that allows Green to not be that target.

I would love to a fit Cox in our forward line. I wonder how long the medicos think he can play for? And while I understand the OP and the desire to wait for one of the three to come on, we do need a deep target. Jurrah does a good job of it but I would prefer a big lump in the square that could help Jamar out in the ruck. Right now, we don't have a player like that near our top 25-30 players.

"You're a grand old flag, You're a high flying flag And forever in peace may you wave. You're the emblem of The land I love. The home of the free and the brave. Ev'ry heart beats true 'neath the Red, White and Blue, Where there's never a boast or brag. But should auld acquaintance be forgot, Keep your eye on the grand old flag." Now that is funny. Yanks, heh. They can write a song. I just wish we could have found a song from a country with just red and blue in their flag. I feel dirty now... Couldn't help myself, sorry.

Does anyone feel this is ironic? Cause that hurt... No offence to the art of mock trading but this worthless argument is more nourishment than wondering whether the stars will align to see Richard Tambling being traded for a half-cooked potato.

I must have it. It's an ego thing.

Last word.

He's probably comparing his old contract, which was significant, to the one in front of him now. And he shouldn't compare the two. But when your salary suddenly gets cut in (almost) half, which is where those figures are, you usually don't take it well.

You can stop waiting. I laughed to be honest.

I said only the last line was passive agreesive... Honestly, DC this isn't an argument worth having. I was just trying to make a point subtlely blunt and used your posts to make it just blunt. Apologies.

I'm glad you're always ready to jump in and decipher for posters... Let me decipher my 'lecture' for you: Some on this board are incredibly sensitive when there is a hint of personal comment, those same people then throw out personal jabs without a hint of self awareness of their hypocrisy. My 'lecture' is to point out the disengenuous response I got from one of these posters. Of course I sound anal; it's ridiculous to think that there is a difference between me calling someone an idiot and telling someone their view is idiotic. You may not have seen the thread that this originated from, but let me tell you and agent_orange that my tongue was firmly in my cheek with my 'anal post'. Now that you know this I guess you can speak for me whenever someone questions a similar post? (That last line is the only passive agressive portion, I swear.)

The guy is a worse person than he is a player. And that is saying something... Bailey wants a big lump to put in the square that can give 40 mins in the ruck.

I have no idea what having an 'anal in the mix (sic)' means. Maybe an anal person? Maybe he/she is being literal? I'm baffled, intrigued, and other adjectives...

I would give him two years and tell him it will be his last contract. If he has issues with that then he can go a get an extra 200k and 15 games from another club in 2013. The guy might have more than two years left, but to maximise our list Jamar should be placed on the VL in 2013 and Davey in 2014. Bruce has two years left and Green has three. I believe you can have up to 4 Vets but there is a money incentive to keep it at 2.

OK, I'm done. See you guys again in, say, 3 months? Can't wait...

But you didn't say that 'we shouldn't be wearing white on GF day' - you implied that what we are now (red and blue) is all we ever should be (GF or any other match) and all the identity we should identify with - that is being dismissive of the past.

I had to edit it because Mr Orange placed it in the quote box from my post, leaving his line unquotable. I thought it prudent to ask what 'there's always one anal in the mix (sic)' means...

Really... You love your hyperbole don't you. All top selections are very good footy players - the thing that differentiates them are their physical attributes - their body. You compared the two because they are the same age and you believe that fans should not be so dismissive of a player just as old as the raw Watts but I am here to tell you that Rich at 18 is as ready as Watts at 22 - because of the filled out frame, and the role they are expected to play.

Huh?