rpfc

Davey is on about $450k Bruce was where the money was. Ummm, yeah. It's a tough one. I still don't think we have to worry a great deal and I think any kid leaving this club is out of their mind, or getting bad advice.

Nah, I think it is the tone of plain text that gives the 'keyboard warrior' thing. It's like walking into a supporter owned bar and announcing your desire to work with Reach and if there is any contacts at the bar. He'd get a very friendly 'why don't you google it?'...

Yes, Happy Christmas and, remember, if your chinese - New Years isn't till Feb. Crazy... Good food though...

I was being facetious. Your strike rate stays intact going into the new year...

Everyone here knows that e25 is a troubled young person... So, I guess some advice I would give vis-a-vis your desire to work with the Reach Foundation - try and let stuff like this slide when you are dealing with the kids... Just a thought...

Perhaps then, are they deliberately faulty? The answer is yes. And by yes, I mean no. It's all lies. But they're entertaining lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer is no. It's a conspiracy worthy of WYL!!

Don't see too much to get ansty about here... Although he did post 'value add'... I guess that's when you 'add value' to something... Ironically, 'value add' has added nothing of value to how we converse with each other...

My take is that it is none of my business. Unless it is proven they have done something illegal or morally reprehensible (I don't consider sexual preference as being reprehensible) then why should I care about what a footy player is doing with his naughty bits in front of a camera?

The subtext? You mean discussing whether Roo-y is gay? It's none of our business to discuss, but please make a fool of yourself.

Just trying to throw some love to the non-members. But no-one is giving me quarterly sales updates... The non-members will not be happy!!

All valid questions. For their wives, girlfriends, dads, and mums. No sisters or brothers! They don't get to ask those questions! It's none of our concern, nor is it the AFL's or St Kilda's.

Huh? This thread is about the Demon shop and the new jumpers, and you have taken it on a 'charity once a year isn't worth it' and 'we should feel sorry for those that died and not those that saw the deaths' race baited tangent. I take threads on tangents all the time but yours is a provocative one and is better placed on another board, your own blog, or the comments section under a YouTube video. I'm sure you will get a number of thumbs up! So that's good...

Yes, but how is the Demon Shop going?

Ugh. Don't we have a 'self-righteous board' for this stuff?

I would prefer to be a permanent Australian.

The last time I was on this thread it was a different topic but if we are judging the career of Cam Bruce - I will say he was an elite runner with adequate skills who could definitely go forward a kick a goal, go back and do a job, go to a wing and find the footy. A bit of a jack of all trades, master of you know what... But he was a very good accumulator of possies and that is/was valuable. He was on serious coin, which was no fault of his - we had to pay somebody. In terms of value for money... That's a misnomer too, in that whether you come 1st or last you have to pay 92.5% of around $8m. So the value for money changes as the ladder changes. Last word: Could have been anything if it wasn't for Guerra. Great three weeks (8 BW votes) and never recaptured his ability to get the hard ball after that.

Yeah, I have it on my iPhone, it's awful quality though. I think I will try to compress it again. Ahh, the internet. Where would we be wi...porn!

See fellas. I have a way with women...

I am happy.

Well, we can always go outside and fight? Heh. You're absolutley right. There are no right or wrong answers but there is an absolute truth that I think we can all agree on: That Colin Garland is strong enough, tall enough, and good enough to play as a key position back and that is what he has played in the past and will play in the foreseeable future. And if you can't agree to that statement then you are wrong.

I honestly hate it when that is invoked. Why are we posting on this site then? Perhaps we need a statutory declaration of all posters to make sure that they played at a minimum level of footy before they can post. Is the Canberra league high enough? Queeensland? I guess that's it for women to have a view on the game. F... off Jaded!

Huh? Stick to the topic and your argument.

Completely agree. Been off my game slightly last few days but Doggo has just pinned down dee-luded (sorry man) and it was grand. Well argued.

Congratulations, and who knew this would come on the 21st of December, but this is officially the oddest comment on Land this year! It was a tight race between, well, other Dee-luded comments but also Freak, and others too...

DC - What happens when Frawley gets injured? You replace him someone who isn't as good. You cannot replace your best players. And I hope we aren't going down the track of 'depth' because good depth is a contradiction in terms. Having a decent 28th player on your list is great if the 16th best player gets injured, but you cannot replace your best players. As GGR said before - Garland is a tall defender in this new world of fluid backlines and definitions of roles. I don't think Garland is best suited for a flank, I think any blind monkey can play there (hence why I want Grimes to have a crack in the midfield). I want Garland to beat Fev and make him get a spray because his man is racking up the effective disposals forward of the centre. I want him to continue to do what he is doing.