Jump to content

Purple77

Members
  • Posts

    334
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Purple77

  1. Jack Viney leaving helps us, not hinders for mine. 

    Gus plays in the guts more - who is much more creative than Viney's limited disposal skills - and we get likely first rounder in return. 

    I've also never really warmed to Jack's "do what I do" leadership. I honestly don't think it's a bad thing that he leaves. 

    • Like 6
  2. 15 hours ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:
    • So if Gawn doesn’t play, it certainly levels the game up very quickly.
    • Gawn hasn't been named. Scared of getting the usual bath from Grundy, I suppose.
    • Pruess be a Poor Man Mumford by trying to Rough up Grundy.
    • Pruess isn’t a real ruck, I actually rate him, but he’s a Mumford crash and bash type who’ll try to hurt his opponent.

    I still remember that time when Witts, Grundy and Cox were all selected to combat Gawn and Max destroyed them all single-handedly.

    Then there's that time where Max got 34 touches against Grundy... just last year, in fact.

    It's an argument I try to have 'fun' with outwardly with Collingwood supporters about who is better, but I secretly boil inside :P

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
  3. I think TMac is a clear out for mine. 

    Despite a good performance, there is no where else for him to realistically play without expensing a better fit. 

    Langdon aside, I also think no one has shown more than Nathan Jones in that wing/HFF role. So he stays for mine.

    In: Gawn, Viney 

    Out: TMac, Sparrow 

    Sparrow has been good too, but he's the first out in terms of like-for-like with Viney. Otherwise we're getting players OOP

×
×
  • Create New...