biggestred

that along with "youve had so many draft picks you should have won 3"

this thread should be called "how and why are you STILL a Melbourne supporter?"

today i got told "dont worry, essendon got thrashed too". i told her to shove it square up her arse

Alex Ferguson has left man u.... We could do worse.

we have to have white but it is ILLOGICAL to have white.

white is bulldust. fair enough we have to wear a different jumper away at port. why cant that be red? same thing v carlton? against the saints RED OR BLUE would be better. freo same thing. and west coast. infact the only team you could argue red doesnt work for as an away jumper is essendon........and they are a disgusting club.

tell em all to GAGF.

not funny, just so bloody frustrated.

obviously not serious

the bad news? mitch is out. the good news? I now go for geelong. FFS

Demons insiders say the February disclosures show the club did not set out to mislead the AFL, as has been widely reported. But the insiders acknowledge that Dr Bates did not disclose to the Thurin review that after he had discussions with Mr Dank last December he told co-captain Trengove to apply a cream to his foot injury. The cream contained the anti-obesity drug, AOD9604. the cream is legal. nothing to see here. The AFL is furious that it only recently learnt that this drug was used and officials also suspect that Melbourne staff outside of Dr Bates may not have been forthcoming with the league about Mr Dank’s activities. The AFL clearly has no idea. Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/essendon-find-bill-for-banned-drug-20130426-2ikou.html#ixzz2RaF087l3

Confidential documents show the Demons told league officials in February that their club doctor, Dan Bates, had "communications" with Mr Dank and that players had been given vitamin injections at an external clinic. •Dr Bates failed to disclose in an internal club review in March that he had asked co-captain Jack Trengove to use a cream containing an anti-obesity drug banned by doping authorities this week. Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/essendon-find-bill-for-banned-drug-20130426-2ikou.html#ixzz2RaEHz17b so we DID tell the AFL. and if bates forgot to tell the afl about trengove it does NOT MATTER AS THE CREAM IS LEGAL.

logically a cream would have far, far less of the active ingredient in it than an injection, so much so that a cream would make no difference to performance.

i liked it.

they won a game.

there would be a difference between the cream and injecting the liquid. obviously the cream would be a vastly reduced dose. it would make logical sense if a cream was permitted and an injection of the same chemical not.

given that trengove was alleged to have used the AOD CREAM and the club said that nothing the players were alleged to have used in the 730 report were illegal, you have to assume that the AOD CREAM is ok.... assumption being the brother of all fark ups

incorrect. he has volunteered to stand down WHILE THE INVESTIGATION IS RUNNING. in much the same way a teacher would stand down (innocent or guilty) if they were being accused of something inappropriate, while it was investigated.

shed sack everyone and then write a scathing article about melbournes ceo sacking everyone.

id go back there if I were you. ignorance is bliss sometimes. here's your baseball glove and ball.... ill be in the cell next door.

That Freo game

you can try but you cant kill us off!!! bring it on!

i hear black caviar has been on the james hird juice. of course, about as much credibility here as north korean news

if they ONLY fine the bombers for throwing drugs around left right and centre it will be a disgrace. no matter how big the fine. the message will be "use whatever you want, you just have to pay $". if youre a rich club, you might as well use them for a year and youll easily get those $ back in revenue. imagine if a roman abramovic bought a club? heres a cool $100 million boys, use whatever you like, ill pay the fine. no. they must ban anyone and everyone who is guilty. for years.

there is no reason (for example) we couldnt wear a 70s throwback light blue jumper with red away to teams like port and essendon. NONE. or the saints for that matter. there is no reason we could not wear a jumper with a red yoke, navy below it for a few inches and then red again, effectively giving the jumper a blue v on a red background (use your imagination) for teams that still clash (like carlton). in fact, there is no team i can think of where we would need to wear white at all, but still having a significantly different jumper.