titan_uranus

I have to say, I'm glad to see Jamar is off the table. Mainly because, if we were going to trade him, we'd likely be looking at Seaby. Which would be horrible.

Haha, love it.

Mm, yeah good point bub. I wonder if they're twisting the design we sent them in some way. I hope it's not red to white.

Precisely. It's our fault for players not wanting to come to our club. Not theirs.

I would agree with you Redleg, but I have no knowledge about Thorp or Dowler. I take it they're forwards?

I agree, however, I didn't mind when we retired number 20 for the 2005 season, following the incidents of Boxing Day 2004. But, in terms of a retiring player, of course there's no reason to retire the number. Just give it to a new player and move on.

I sent both a link to this thread and a picture of the jumper to Martin Cox. He replied: Thanks for your feedback. The Club has received lots of feedback regarding our clash jumper, and we are developing a design that takes all of this feedback on board. I hope he's telling the truth.

No idea why, but 1, 16, 18 looks much nicer than 1, 17, 19.

Sounds good, but I'd assume Carlton wouldn't just sit there waiting for us, they'd be looking at other, similar offers and would just turn their back on us once they realised we're looking at PSD.

Aargh.. I hate all this talk about Armitage. Why on earth would we consider him? He's just an average, run of the mill crap player. This would have to be a worse decision than looking at Seaby.

I'm not sure Geelong would rate Lovett highly enough.

I like CJ, but I wouldn't care much if we traded him, especially if someone is willing to part with a pick in the 20s or 30s.

Damn. I'd like Prismall to come to Melbourne, but I suspect, given the choice, he'd take Essendon (or, for that matter, any other Victorian club) over Melbourne.

No

What a joke. I have already lost most interest. By the time they're announced there will already be contenders for next year's award. The problem I think is that the nominations from Round 1 have had, what, 5, 6 months to accumulate votes? The ones from the grand final have had 2 weeks. I think they're letting it stretch out so that there can be a fair amount of votes for the later nominations. But that's beside the point. A panel of judges should decide the winner. It shouldn't be a popularity contest. Edit: According to Mike Sheahan, no one at the AFL knows what's going on in regards to MOTY and GOTY: http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl...1-19742,00.html

My gut feeling is, unless a super-high pick is offered (like, 1-10), in which case he would be traded, Laidley is just doing this to give McIntosh a wake up call. In 2007 he was close to All-Australian, and was streets in front of Hale and Petrie. Now he's lagging behind, and Laidley's done this to let him know his position in the team isn't automatic anymore.

For all we know they were sent by two Demonland readers who both saw this rumour and decided to tell SEN.

Here we go...

Pick 17 for Walker? You're kidding, right? Walker is a hack, and plays less than Rivers too. And you can see us giving up pick 17 for him...

Mmm yeah I thought that was the case.

Best: Rogue or Nasher (Honourable mention to Belzebub) Most entertaining: Yze Magic Funniest: Redandbluethruandthru

Yeah, I saw him up close too, and he is quite the man. As far as his football goes, he didn't make 4th in the B&F based on skill. He is one player who does what is asked of him, and the coaches have rewarded him.

I still think that a dominant display by a ruckman can change the course of a game. But yes, if it costs too much, a good midfielder could help to overcome a ruckman deficiency. Well let's agree to disagree HT. I'd rate Simmonds above Campbell, but whatever.

Yeah I think it's delayed a bit because there were nominations from the GF, and, to make it fair, they need time to accumulate votes. So maybe this week.