Mach5

In this instance. It still shouldn't be used as a KPI.

FFS... I'm sure there's probably some supporters out there who think Cale Morton got a raw deal, but it's hardly indicative of anything... Your attempt to add credence to the idea of recruiting Melksham was beyond weak.

Setting the bat pretty low mate...

Very possibly. Good point, he's never had a good natural football brain. Can find the footy now, but maybe still lacks the rest.

I think if we had the opportunity we should grab it with both hands. Has been stifled at Geelong, and kicked bags when given his few opportunities. In any case, he should be looking for a new home as he's undervalued in Geelong. Scott specifically doesn't rate him, but all the other coaches do. But then again, Scott rates Smedts when most there would give him the flick.

Had super breakaway pace, but without that is a limited player, and as such, with dodgy hammies, not worth a punt.

Yeah, nah, he has a point.

My point put a little more eloquently, but not as succinct.

back injury, wasn't it? But maybe neck related...

I know that Chris Scott personally does not rate Walker, so I think we could get him for a fair return. And I don't think Scott not rating him is any sort of slight, because he does rate Billy Smedts, so clearly his judgment is a bit suspect.

I reckon he can ruck alright against other non-ruckmen.

What about legal drugs? I find it amusing that you make the distinction.

He's one of the best interviews I've heard. Unintentionally hilarious. A very different cat.

The bloke looks like the old hot tuna logo.

Still it has shown to have some value in the past. I get impeccable mail from another club, yet I was wrong about a certain defender just recently, as the drastic change of heart that had occurred hadn't been passed on to me. Made me look a little silly, much to my amusement. If anything it showed me that you can have the best contacts around, but this industry remains fluid and timing is everything.

Expecting a little bit too much, I think.

Nope. Be a simpleton if you like, but I was making the point that legality has no bearing on prevalence, and simultaneously that legality does not equate to morality. Concepts beyond your comprehension maybe or incapable of reading multiple posts and understanding the theme; I don't care which it is. You're wrong.

How was that not the argument? I think you may have comprehension issues.

Nope. The sheep are those who refuse to believe it is prevalent.

Speaking of which... *cough* Brisbane... *cough* Adcock... What are they thinking?! It's a mind-boggling homage to the Schwab era! They even have their own Schwab! ... can we offload Bail, Fitzy and Terlich to them for a 1st rounder?

Too much I'd have thought - only a 2016 2nd rounder would be the preference.

The suns came out & said "he WILL be traded."

Lovell? I'd be disappointed if we used anything earlier than a 2nd rounder on him, and even then I'm not overly enthused.

From one mark that wasn't really that spectacular at all...

I suspect it may be true that she heard it. I also believe that anything PJ would say to Dr. Turf, he would say in the full knowledge that there was a likelihood it would be repeated, possibly on radio. And there's also the potential that PJ would say it with a certain motive in mind.