Jump to content

DemonLad5

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DemonLad5

  1. Sorry but I think we got trade raped
  2. Maybe we package the late picks along with Dunn to get pick 28 back from the Pies. Helps them with father son picks
  3. We need to get a 3rd club involved to keep our pick
  4. Yeah sorry meant thursday
  5. This will get done but seems like a 12:00 + deal on Tuesday. Whoever blinks first
  6. You're right. Let's give Lewis back. I really didn't want to give up pick 66 anyway
  7. Brisbane came to us about Dunn yesterday, so they clearly haven't lost interest. It said that we'd spoken to a number of clubs yesterday. I wonder what about?
  8. Well think about it like they are getting overs for Hanley. moving from 21 to 8 means WAY more than moving from 43 to 30
  9. Haha just came to me mate. Hope Josh Mahoney reads DL
  10. LIGHT BULB JUST WENT OFF Melbourne Receive: Pick 30 , Pick 52 Melbourne Lose: Lynden Dunn , Pick 46 Brisbane Receive: Lynden Dunn , pick 8 Brisbane Lose: Pearce Hanley, pick 30 Hawthorn Receive: Jaeger, O Meara Hawthorn Lose: Pick 14, pick 52, Kaiden Brand, Will Langford Gold Coast Receive: Pearce Hanley, Kaiden Brand, Pick 14, pick 46, Will Langford, Gold coast lose: Pick 8, Jaeger O Seems like all 4 clubs would agree to that was going to give GCS pick 21 and 22 to Brizzy instead of 8 but pick 8 is more valuable to Brisbane because 21 and 22 give GCS more points for Bowes. THEN: Melbourne Receive: Michael Hibberd Melbourne Lose: 2017 2nd rounder, pick 52 (possibly add 2017 1st if they don't budge) Essendon Receive ; Melbourne 2017 2nd rounder, pick 52 Essendon Lose: Michael Hibberd THEN: Melbourne Receive: Pick 15 Melbourne Lose: Pick 28 and Pick 30 GWS Receive : Pick 28 and Pick 30 GWS Lose: Pick 15 Gws gain 200 points for their academy guns OVERALL TRADE PERIOD Melbourne Receive: Michael Hibberd, Pick 15 Melbourne Lose: Pick 26, Pick 46, 2017 2nd rounder Not bad?
  11. I dislike Essendon as much as the next demon supporter but I don't think it's fair to bash them. There are 2 current trade scenarios. 1 pick is more valuable than the other. Perhaps a 3rd party could be involved. Or we give them pick 45 as well. Will probably just end up being 2016 2nd
  12. I can see him being a great player for Melbourne. Far exceeding his Essendon days.
  13. DemonLad5 posted a post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Still OOC at the end of the year. Vic boy. Brother plays for Collingwood. Still 20 yrs old. Would be a good option as he possesses great speed and goal sense through the midfield. Something we need when our only ball carrier with genuine speed is Hunt Worth a look 100% for the right price. http://www.fremantlefc.com.au/player-profile/ed-langdon http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Ratings/Player/119395/Ed-LANGDON
  14. DemonLad5 replied to junk's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Mark my words, several clubs will be making phone calls if we decide to put Trengove on the trade block.
  15. I love this bloke. So composed and calm with the footy
  16. NBA

    DemonLad5 replied to Jack Jack's post in a topic in Other Sports
    He moved to the states when he was 14
  17. DemonLad5 replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Is Fyfe in play? Do we want to lose Hogan? If not, then Fyfe is not in play
  18. woo hoo!!!! Welcome Clayton!!!
  19. Sam Landesberger, also Herald Sun. The guy who does the 'Pick me' videos for draftees
  20. Correct me if i'm wrong but didn't Jason Taylor draft Dane Swan with a pick in the 50s/60s or was that another recruiter?
  21. DemonLad5 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    These poor kids that get drafted early, so much expectation. Someone drafted in the 50s or 60s might have the same ability has Parish. If he doesn't make it, then nobody really cares, at least he had a go, nobody was expecting anything anyway. If Parish turned out to be average he would be swarmed with critic media, haters and a reputation for being a draft bust
  22. Haha I don't know why I suddenly want him so bad. He looks seriously good
  23. I am actually not joking here. I think we should take Oliver at 3
  24. I'll admit his highlights look great, but why has he not been able to produce like this before the 2nd half of this year?