ManDee

Frawley Gawn Scullduggery Blease Morton

Left to right, Frawley, Blease, Bailey, Gysberts, Maric, Tapscott, Voldemort, Trengove, Strauss, Grimes, Watts & Morton Thanks fndee & akum, I had Maric the first time then i stuffed up.

All that talent and not one A grader, maybe Frawley and he is gone. Who is the guy between Blease and Maric?

That's a worry, smiling with Petracca. Maybe they are both off to Freo! Haha

That is my feeling too. We don't need a top up to replace Melksham. We have several players that can do a similar job. Better to upgrade our rookies or Smith, at least we get to keep them. Why waste resources on a player we may never use and have no rights to.

Now you're being pedantic. Compared to Terlich..... But you are so right. That is the price we pay for dealing with the EFC.

Yes, Melksham can play. Dead give away.

What is the name of this thread? I am with you D4L Start another thread guys.

The fine for bringing the game into disrepute was for failure to keep appropriate records, not for a program where 34 players have been found guilty of drug cheating. They have not been penalised for drug cheating and are unlikely to be, this is a travesty of justice.

Yes we did get fined for bringing the game into disrepute. Have EFC been fined for that? Or was Chris Connoly's joke worse than having 34 drug cheats in a systematic PED program? The AFL are a disgrace on this matter

Yes we did get fined for bringing the game into disrepute. Have EFC been fined for that? Or was Chris Connoly's joke worse than having 34 drug cheats in a systematic PED program? The AFL are a disgrace on this matter

Take a chill pill Curry. You said Curry & Beer "it's not an indicator of a goddam thing" Well my friend it is a very good indicator of several things, including that the football department thought he was worth it. No doubt you will ignore this fact as it does not suit your argument which is I might say more intent on character assassination than informed comment. If you were to try some of your own suggestions perhaps we would all be better off.

I think it is an indicator that he is a better footballer than you, what was the longest contract offered to you? --------------------------- You said "it's not an indicator of a goddam thing" Clearly it is an indicator the the football department thought he was worth it. Seriously you should re-read the posts and apologise, you've completely misfired.

I think it is an indicator that he is a better footballer than you, what was the longest contract offered to you?

Praising bringing the ball to the ground always makes me laugh, gravity has always been good at that.

Same as Marcus Glasscock and fabulous Phil?

What number is he?

I like the cut of his jib. Weirderman (sic) I think he will play about 5 games next year and more importantly I think Hogan will love playing with him, these two are going to cause havoc amongst backlines for years to come. Jeff G & Kent will be licking their lips.

That was put there just for you. Irony is lost on some.

No problems reading it but i have no comprehension as to what it means.

Intentional tautology? Perhaps the unscrupulous is redundant. I think you have the rest nailed.

hwfua, let me think, ....... no I'll get it..... no, I have no idea who that is. Not enough vowels at the beginning for me.

He has great vision and in those highlights every disposal hits its target. Also looked to make good decisions, but my only info is 4min of highlights, Sammy Blease looked like a super start too. But I think Parish has a hard edge so I say yes at 3.