Demonland

Cast your votes please folks 6,5,4,3,2,1

Goodwin and Hibberd good to go.

Most likely where Tom got it from because I haven’t seen it anywhere else.

They probably did review it but like last night they didn't have the camera angles or the technology to reverse it. Had they had access to the fans view the it most certainly would have been called a goal but unfortunately there are no cameras situated behind the goals and on all angles.

We can all agree that Essendon are 💩

The fact is it’s not definitive and this angle is more definitive either way than what ARC had. There is no way they can say with certainty with their angles that it was or wasn’t a goal. The goal umpire’s decision should have stood. Having said that I’m very happy Richmond lost.

Looks like a goal from this angle. Perhaps ARC need to take submissions from the crowd.

vs Carlton 2000

Rain app on my phone has 0% chance of rain during the hours of the match and in the hours leading up to the match. However weather reports aren't always accurate and I'm reminded of this.

They also need to up the resolution on all their other cameras.

Looks like the Swans got a run on the G. How is that fair?

/thread

I don't think players claims or celebrations or lack thereof should come into account. Ask the opinion of the umpire and that can include other umpires but go by the visual or audio (snickometer) evidence and if it is insufficient then revert to the umpires call. Whether Lynch's kick was a goal or not the umpire called it goal, the evidence was insufficient to prove either way so the umpire's call whether right or wrong must stand. In any event they need to invest in better technology in the future so that this type of decision does not cost a team a flag.

I'm not sure why this is considering some players sometimes blatantly lie that they touched the ball.

Nothing on social media in regards to this.