Demonland

by The Oracle It was early in the final quarter and the game was well and truly over. Matthew Richardson marked the ball in front of Nathan Carroll at a little over fifty metres from goal. Noticing that his opponent's attention was elsewhere, he took advantage of the situation, ran around Carroll and booted a goal that put the Tigers back to eight goals in front. The next thing that happened was that a kindly trainer came along and gave the Demon defender a drink. And that was it. An hour later, the coach fronted the media and slammed his players for an "embarrassing and insipid effort"; the loss was "the team's worst in a long time" and he vowed his side would respond to the defeat. The how and the why of the promised response was not explained but I suspect that the details have not yet reached the drawing board stage. After all, the blueprint for the entire 2007 season has long been declared a total failure and, in its place, there are no Plans B, C or D. Had there been a Plan B, C or D then it should have been employed at the ten-minute mark of the first quarter which was the time when the coach said he knew "the writing was on the wall". In the context of this match, that was about five minutes after it had become obvious to the rest of us. Melbourne's first two or three forays up forward were easily thwarted due to a lack of marking targets. Two of Richmond's early goals came as a result of coast-to-coast movement of the ball from defence to attack to goal without challenge. This pattern had been well and truly set for the night. In the context of the season of course, the writing had been well and truly engraved on the wall a long time ago. The problem is that the pattern has hardly been altered as the club's season lurched out of control. Last night's game was allowed to become a training drill for the bottom side - one which had not won a game in the first two and half months of the season. Richmond's last goal of the first half from Shane Tuck said it all. He took the ball in the middle and ran unimpeded to forty metres to slot it through. Shamefully, as was the case for most of that half of football, not a single opponent came near him. Yes, blame the players by all means for the lack of pressure on their opponents because they were absolutely pathetic. There was no application, intensity or hunger for the football and there was no sense or purpose in the way they played but the same can be said for the people pulling the strings up there in stratosphere. They were equally insipid starting with their team selection and ending with their slow reaction to the initial Tiger onslaught. After that, they were simply rotating deckchairs on a fast sinking Titanic. There's no use in hanging your hat on the fact that Melbourne won the second half because a young team like Richmond is always going to tire after the effort it expended in the first. The Demons had the wrong combination out there from the start but, in any event, they were switched off when they came out onto the ground. And that brings me to ask the fundamental question which this game raised. What is wrong with this club? When the team won what was only its second game for the first half of the season, the playing group was falling over itself to declare Neale Daniher the best thing since sliced bread. Russell Robertson used his post-match interview following his seven goals against Collingwood to give "a resounding thumbs up to the prospect of Daniher being offered another contract." We were treated to a virtual chorus of Demons singing Daniher's praises and telling us how much respect they had for him. Well, they stopped singing last night because, by their performance - and that's what counts in this caper - all they could do was to show that they hold him in utter contempt. Perhaps the players will one day realise that if you can't walk the walk on a regular basis, you don't talk the talk. In the meantime, they should leave it to those who have been charged with making the hard decisions about running the club to make those decisions. I trust that the Board has already made this fact known to the playing group, otherwise it will come back to embarrass them when they have to make some hard decisions in the near future. I am not even going to mention Melbourne's better players, and they were few and far between, because that was another heartbreaking aspect of this game. The sad fact of the matter is that a lot of them are at the end of their careers and won't be part of the club when the next coach comes along to pick up the pieces. Hopefully, the person in question will have what it takes to give his full back his full dues and not hesitate to remove him from the ground if he ever takes his eyes off an opponent after being outmarked. Melbourne 2.2.14 2.4.16 8.6.54 11.9.75 Richmond 6.3.39 12.8.80 14.12.96 18.16.124 Goals Melbourne B Holland 3 A Davey 2 M Bate P Johnson N Jones B McLean R Petterd R Robertson Richmond N Brown K Pettifer M Richardson G Tivendale 3 B Deledio C Hyde 2 K Johnson S Tuck Best Melbourne not this week thank you Richmond S Tuck N Foley G Tivendale J Bowden M Richardson G Polak Umpires C Donlon M James B Rosebury Crowd: 46,161 at the MCG

by J. V. McKay Barring a drawn grand final, an AFL season consists of 185 games. If you ask the average punter to nominate which of these fixtures would garner the least possible interest from football fans this year, the answer would almost certainly be tomorrow night's clash of the 16th v 15th - Richmond against Melbourne. This contest is already shaping up as one where the care factor among the football public is virtually non-existent. Things are that bad that the AFL is seriously considering locking the gates at the start of the game to keep the crowd inside. In order to maintain interest, the MCG management is organising a competition for the best dressed streaker and Connex has reduced the number of trains to and from Richmond station in order that it should adequately cater for the expected attendance. The prospect of this game between the AFL's cellar dwellers has generated such a lack of excitement that while writing the first paragraph of this review I nodded off to sleep twice. Let's face it, I'm writing the preview from hell. There is very little to say for both teams on their performances so far this year and while my introduction might sound a bit cruel, what is there about this game that could possibly induce any sane, rational, human being to come out of doors in freezing temperatures to risk the possibility of contracting something like pneumonia? I once said that the day I go to watch the two lowest ranked football teams in the land play against each other will be the day that hell freezes over. Well, judging by the weather report, there's a fair chance of that happening tomorrow night! So what on earth is there to attract someone to a contest where the teams out in the middle have collectively won two and a half games out of 22? I thought long and hard about that question scratching around desperately for an answer. One possibility is that there might be some interest in which team would collect the first draft pick at the end of the year. However, recruiting gurus tell me that there are no stand out players this year like Bryce Gibbs. They say that any one of five players might go number one in the November player lottery so there's not that much advantage in finishing last. Which leaves us with precious little. A finals place is out of the question and there’s not much likelihood of individual honours like Brownlow or a Coleman Medal for the members of either club. All I can say then is that there's little more than pride at stake tomorrow night. The two combatants began the season with high hopes. Melbourne was hopeful of finishing top four after three consecutive seasons in the 5 to 8 range. Similarly, and despite Terry Wallace's denials to the contrary and some mumbling about 2011 being the Tigers' year, Richmond was hoping to go at least one better than its 9th placing of 2006. For various reasons, mainly injury but also a lack of talent on the field, the hopes of both sides were shattered early in the piece and it's only been in the last couple of rounds that either side has collected any premiership points at all. Tomorrow night one of the sides will reap a bonanza – four premiership points, some bragging rights and a weekend in which the coach, players and supporters can hold their heads high and say, "we won!" That beats losing and even if it's the most exciting thing they can say about Friday night at the G, it's the reason that I'll be there (albeit in my thermals). THE GAME Richmond v. Melbourne at the MCG – 22 June 2007 at 7.40pm HEAD TO HEAD Overall: Richmond 95 wins Melbourne 75 wins 2 draws At the G: Richmond 62 wins Melbourne 55 wins 1 draw Since 2000: Richmond 6 wins Melbourne 5 wins MEDIA TV Channel 7 at 8.30pm (delayed telecast) RADIO 3AW MMM 774ABC SEN K-Rock THE BETTING Richmond to win $2.50 Melbourne to win $1.50 LAST TIME THEY MET Melbourne 9.16.70 d Richmond 7.10.52, Round 15, 2006, at MCG. The game was an absolute stinker and but for Russell Robertson's superlative marking performance including a hanger or two, many of the spectators would have fallen asleep. The game was characterised by its errors, Richmond's negative style and Melbourne's inaccuracy in front of goal. James McDonald and Matthew Whelan worked hard for the Demon victory but the game was as forgettable as they come. THE TEAMS RICHMOND Backs Jake King Will Thursfield Joel Bowden Half backs Andrew Raines Graham Polak Chris Newman Centreline Dean Polo Shane Tuck Richard Tambling Half forwards Kayne Pettifer Matthew Richardson Chris Hyde Forwards Nathan Brown Cleve Hughes Brett Deledio Followers Adam Pattison Kane Johnson Nathan Foley Interchange Shane Edwards Cam Howat Daniel Jackson Matthew White Emergencies Greg Tivendale Andrew Krakouer Jack Riewoldt In Nathan Brown Out Kent Kingsley (omitted) MELBOURNE Backs Daniel Ward Nathan Carroll Ben Holland Half backs Paul Wheatley Clint Bizzell Daniel Bell Centreline Cameron Bruce James McDonald Simon Godfrey Half forwards Brad Green Russell Robertson Aaron Davey Forwards Colin Sylvia David Neitz Matthew Bate Followers Jeff White Brock McLean Nathan Jones Interchange James Frawley Paul Johnson Ricky Petterd Byron Pickett Emergencies Nathan Brown Michael Newton Adem Yze In Byron Pickett Out Travis Johnstone (Achilles soreness) THE BATTLE OF THE SURVIVORS It has been well documented that both of these teams have had their share of injury woes this season. The Tigers main ruckmen in Troy Simmonds and Trent Knobel have been sidelined for a while and Ray Hall is both injured and suspended by the club. Their best midfielder Mark Coghlan is out for the season with a knee injury and Patrick Bowden is another regular out of the side. We know Melbourne's injury story from back to front and it got worse after the Collingwood game with Travis Johnstone out and David Neitz unlikely to lead the team after surgery last week. That comes on top of the news that Clint Bartram, Brent Moloney and Jared Rivers may all be long term injury list prospects. These add to the hellishness of the exercise of previewing a game when you must to decide which team will prevail with what they have left standing. It's not easy sifting through the names of the players who have escaped from their respective clubs' infirmaries. On the credit side, each of the teams is welcoming back a big name. Richmond's Nathan Brown has been missing as a result of complications from that terrible leg injury he incurred a couple of years ago against the Demons on a midwinter Friday night at the Telstra Dome. He has had very little football in his recovery but has shown recently at VFL level that he hasn't lost his talent for kicking goals and he will be a danger man on the Tiger forward line. Melbourne's Byron Pickett has served his penance for that hangover that prevented him from taking his place as an emergency against the Bulldogs about five weeks ago and he is back in the side allegedly at his slimmest ever. However, I saw footage of him at training and to my untrained eye he looked more like the "before" part than the "after" in a Jenny Craig advertisement. The club reckons he’s been going like a steam train in the VFL but I think the train’s called "Puffing Billy". Despite their lowly positions, both sides have shown impressive form in their last two matches with Melbourne winning both and Richmond sharing the points with Brisbane and then heading the Dockers for three quarters at Subiaco before succumbing to some Pavlich magic at the end. The one thing that the Tigers really lacked over the four quarters was a quality ruckman. Melbourne has Jeff White and the emerging Paul Johnson while Richmond is banking on makeshift key forwards who are more pinch hitters in this division. That is normally a major disadvantage to a team and, to my mind, it's what tips the balance in favour of the Demons. A lot will depend on the form of Tiger forward Matthew Richardson. If he can reproduce his best then Richmond is a definite chance to pick up its first win of the season. Melbourne has Ben Holland fresh from working over Anthony Rocca and if Benny doesn't work, there's always Nathan Carroll. There has been much public discussion of late as to who will be Melbourne’s next on field leader and the name "Brock McLean" has been mentioned in a few despatches. After missing most of the first half of the season Brocky's back to his near best and he's sworn off smashing up plastic chairs forever. Along with fellow young on baller Nathan Jones, he adds hardness to the Demon midfield and that is where I think the Demons will gain the impetus to continue their winning streak and make it three in a row. Melbourne by 12 points in a game that will make the hapless Tigers feel as if they are moving deeper into their own private little hell.

THE PREVIEW FROM HELL by J. V. McKay Barring a drawn grand final, an AFL season consists of 185 games. If you ask the average punter to nominate which of these fixtures would garner the least possible interest from football fans this year, the answer would almost certainly be tomorrow night's clash of the 16th v 15th - Richmond against Melbourne. This contest is already shaping up as one where the care factor among the football public is virtually non-existent. Things are that bad that the AFL is seriously considering locking the gates at the start of the game to keep the crowd inside. In order to maintain interest, the MCG management is organising a competition for the best dressed streaker and Connex has reduced the number of trains to and from Richmond station in order that it should adequately cater for the expected attendance. The prospect of this game between the AFL's cellar dwellers has generated such a lack of excitement that while writing the first paragraph of this review I nodded off to sleep twice. Let's face it, I'm writing the preview from hell. There is very little to say for both teams on their performances so far this year and while my introduction might sound a bit cruel, what is there about this game that could possibly induce any sane, rational, human being to come out of doors in freezing temperatures to risk the possibility of contracting something like pneumonia? I once said that the day I go to watch the two lowest ranked football teams in the land play against each other will be the day that hell freezes over. Well, judging by the weather report, there's a fair chance of that happening tomorrow night! So what on earth is there to attract someone to a contest where the teams out in the middle have collectively won two and a half games out of 22? I thought long and hard about that question scratching around desperately for an answer. One possibility is that there might be some interest in which team would collect the first draft pick at the end of the year. However, recruiting gurus tell me that there are no stand out players this year like Bryce Gibbs. They say that any one of five players might go number one in the November player lottery so there's not that much advantage in finishing last. Which leaves us with precious little. A finals place is out of the question and there’s not much likelihood of individual honours like Brownlow or a Coleman Medal for the members of either club. All I can say then is that there's little more than pride at stake tomorrow night. The two combatants began the season with high hopes. Melbourne was hopeful of finishing top four after three consecutive seasons in the 5 to 8 range. Similarly, and despite Terry Wallace's denials to the contrary and some mumbling about 2011 being the Tigers' year, Richmond was hoping to go at least one better than its 9th placing of 2006. For various reasons, mainly injury but also a lack of talent on the field, the hopes of both sides were shattered early in the piece and it's only been in the last couple of rounds that either side has collected any premiership points at all. Tomorrow night one of the sides will reap a bonanza – four premiership points, some bragging rights and a weekend in which the coach, players and supporters can hold their heads high and say, "we won!" That beats losing and even if it's the most exciting thing they can say about Friday night at the G, it's the reason that I'll be there (albeit in my thermals). THE GAME Richmond v. Melbourne at the MCG – 22 June 2007 at 7.40pm HEAD TO HEAD Overall: Richmond 95 wins Melbourne 75 wins 2 draws At the G: Richmond 62 wins Melbourne 55 wins 1 draw Since 2000: Richmond 6 wins Melbourne 5 wins MEDIA TV Channel 7 at 8.30pm (delayed telecast) RADIO 3AW MMM 774ABC SEN K-Rock THE BETTING Richmond to win $2.50 Melbourne to win $1.50 LAST TIME THEY MET Melbourne 9.16.70 d Richmond 7.10.52, Round 15, 2006, at MCG. The game was an absolute stinker and but for Russell Robertson's superlative marking performance including a hanger or two, many of the spectators would have fallen asleep. The game was characterised by its errors, Richmond's negative style and Melbourne's inaccuracy in front of goal. James McDonald and Matthew Whelan worked hard for the Demon victory but the game was as forgettable as they come. THE TEAMS RICHMOND Backs Jake King Will Thursfield Joel Bowden Half backs Andrew Raines Graham Polak Chris Newman Centreline Dean Polo Shane Tuck Richard Tambling Half forwards Kayne Pettifer Matthew Richardson Chris Hyde Forwards Nathan Brown Cleve Hughes Brett Deledio Followers Adam Pattison Kane Johnson Nathan Foley Interchange Shane Edwards Cam Howat Daniel Jackson Matthew White Emergencies Greg Tivendale Andrew Krakouer Jack Riewoldt In Nathan Brown Out Kent Kingsley (omitted) MELBOURNE Backs Daniel Ward Nathan Carroll Ben Holland Half backs Paul Wheatley Clint Bizzell Daniel Bell Centreline Cameron Bruce James McDonald Simon Godfrey Half forwards Brad Green Russell Robertson Aaron Davey Forwards Colin Sylvia David Neitz Matthew Bate Followers Jeff White Brock McLean Nathan Jones Interchange James Frawley Paul Johnson Ricky Petterd Byron Pickett Emergencies Nathan Brown Michael Newton Adem Yze In Byron Pickett Out Travis Johnstone (Achilles soreness) THE BATTLE OF THE SURVIVORS It has been well documented that both of these teams have had their share of injury woes this season. The Tigers main ruckmen in Troy Simmonds and Trent Knobel have been sidelined for a while and Ray Hall is both injured and suspended by the club. Their best midfielder Mark Coghlan is out for the season with a knee injury and Patrick Bowden is another regular out of the side. We know Melbourne's injury story from back to front and it got worse after the Collingwood game with Travis Johnstone out and David Neitz unlikely to lead the team after surgery last week. That comes on top of the news that Clint Bartram, Brent Moloney and Jared Rivers may all be long term injury list prospects. These add to the hellishness of the exercise of previewing a game when you must to decide which team will prevail with what they have left standing. It's not easy sifting through the names of the players who have escaped from their respective clubs' infirmaries. On the credit side, each of the teams is welcoming back a big name. Richmond's Nathan Brown has been missing as a result of complications from that terrible leg injury he incurred a couple of years ago against the Demons on a midwinter Friday night at the Telstra Dome. He has had very little football in his recovery but has shown recently at VFL level that he hasn't lost his talent for kicking goals and he will be a danger man on the Tiger forward line. Melbourne's Byron Pickett has served his penance for that hangover that prevented him from taking his place as an emergency against the Bulldogs about five weeks ago and he is back in the side allegedly at his slimmest ever. However, I saw footage of him at training and to my untrained eye he looked more like the "before" part than the "after" in a Jenny Craig advertisement. The club reckons he’s been going like a steam train in the VFL but I think the train’s called "Puffing Billy". Despite their lowly positions, both sides have shown impressive form in their last two matches with Melbourne winning both and Richmond sharing the points with Brisbane and then heading the Dockers for three quarters at Subiaco before succumbing to some Pavlich magic at the end. The one thing that the Tigers really lacked over the four quarters was a quality ruckman. Melbourne has Jeff White and the emerging Paul Johnson while Richmond is banking on makeshift key forwards who are more pinch hitters in this division. That is normally a major disadvantage to a team and, to my mind, it's what tips the balance in favour of the Demons. A lot will depend on the form of Tiger forward Matthew Richardson. If he can reproduce his best then Richmond is a definite chance to pick up its first win of the season. Melbourne has Ben Holland fresh from working over Anthony Rocca and if Benny doesn't work, there's always Nathan Carroll. There has been much public discussion of late as to who will be Melbourne’s next on field leader and the name "Brock McLean" has been mentioned in a few despatches. After missing most of the first half of the season Brocky's back to his near best and he's sworn off smashing up plastic chairs forever. Along with fellow young on baller Nathan Jones, he adds hardness to the Demon midfield and that is where I think the Demons will gain the impetus to continue their winning streak and make it three in a row. Melbourne by 12 points in a game that will make the hapless Tigers feel as if they are moving deeper into their own private little hell.

Good Get Madness. Barry just rang in to confirm that he was in fact selected to play for Sandringham Seniors.

Good get Deeman.

by Barry from Beach Road Sandringham succumbed to the wind, the rain and a far more committed and disciplined Box Hill Hawks at the Trevor Barker Beach Road Oval on Sunday. The Hawks won the hard slog in difficult conditions by 15 points pushing the Zebras from first to third place on the VFL ladder. Box Hill took advantage of the best conditions of a bad day for football and booted eight goals to virtually seal the game by quarter time. After Sandy spearhead Nick Sautner scored the first goal of the day against the wind, a touch of arrogance crept into the Zebra makeup. The team dropped its guard for a fatal ten minutes and was ambushed by a determined Box Hill combination. During that period, the visitors had all the answers while the home side stumbled and made some fundamental errors like kicking short into the wind and to a contest, leaving the goal square unguarded for a couple of goals and giving away needless free kicks within scoring distance of the opposition's goal. They fell right into Box Hill's trap and by the time the siren sounded to end the opening stanza, trailed by 38 points. There were very few players able to hold their heads high in the huddle but to their credit the Zebras managed to regroup after the first break but there was a problem. They had given away too great a lead and had to play catch up football all the way to the final siren and while they managed to whittle down the Box Hill lead in every quarter, poor kicking for goal dented any chance they may have held for victory. The fact that Box Hill kicked only four goals after the first break and still managed a relatively comfortable winning margin tells most of the story. The rest of the story is that Sandringham was sloppy in front of goal and, despite looking stronger around the ground for the last three quarters, it allowed the Hawks to dictate how the game was being played. Sandy was often forced wide and struggled to go direct even with the wind. The result was a wasteful result on the scoreboard. This wastefulness was accentuated when Box Hill kicked the last two goals of the opening half against the wind. These goals were to prove invaluable in the final wash up. The Zebra cause was not assisted by the elements, particularly after half time when the rains came down and scoring was made all the more difficult. Sandy had more of the play and even outscored Box Hill when kicking against the wind in the third quarter, but the top heavy forward line simply couldn't find the goals often enough. Perhaps, a smaller crumber like Tomi Johnston who booted five in the reserves might have helped on the day. Meanwhile, Box Hill's only goal of the second half was a long booming shot with the wind after a free kick was awarded against the Zebras for a ruck infringement Despite a noticeable lift in intensity in the final term from the likes of Peter Summers and Matthew Whelan, the Zebra efforts were smothered and stifled by a disciplined defensive Box Hill outfit intent on keeping them at bay. The strategy worked with the Hawks wasting away the final minutes while Sandringham tried unsuccessfully to push for goals. They managed to score one solitary major with a strong wind at their backs in the final quarter. Better Sandy players on the day were Matthew Warnock and Andy Biddlecombe (although outsized by bigger opponents). They held the defence together under difficult conditions along with young Colin Garland who assisted them manfully and showed loads of promise. Summers in the middle and Rod Crowe up forward were good contributors. Unfortunately, eight goals from 28 shots at goal (more if you count a couple that went out of bounds on the full) is not the sort of dividend that helps to secure victory. In its past two matches Sandringham has posted 23 goals 37 behinds to 24.17. The forwards will need to be more accurate with their disposal if they are to overcome old rival Port Melbourne at TEAC Oval on Sunday. The Borough hit top form and destroyed Werribee at the same ground last week while Sandy has lost two out of its last three outings putting it under more intense pressure than at any time since its triple premiership run began in 2004. HOW THE DEMONS FARED Jace Bode - tried hard but failed to impress and finished on the umpire's report sheet. Simon Buckley - flashed in and out of the play and looked good at times but wasn't able to stamp his authority on the game. Lynden Dunn - just went in the dismal conditions and never looked like being a threatening player. Colin Garland - you would expect a Tasmanian to do well in these conditions and he didn't let the team down. Played exceptionally well when his side was under fire in the first half. Chris Johnson - started at half back, was injured early in the game and replaced before quarter time not to be seen again for the day. The injury appears to be a hamstring and he looks like being out for a few weeks. Brad Miller - frozen out early, then on and off the ground as coach Williams juggled his top heavy forward line around. Never really got going which was a major disappointment after last week's six goal performance. Shane Neaves - lowered his colours in the ruck and was, at best, patchy around the ground. Michael Newton - started the game on the bench but when he got his opportunity on the ground he was more than useful. Kicked three goals, worked his butt off and went in hard enough for the ball in an attempt to satisfy his AFL coach to consider him this week given the skipper's out with a broken thumb. Would be better if he could time his leaps for the big marks a bit better and not attempt a screamer at every available half opportunity. Byron Pickett - not even the striped jumper could hide the fact that he's still carrying a bit too much in the girth. Was among the best early, intimidated a few Box Hill defenders and kicked a magnificent goal on the run in the second quarter. However, by the final quarter, he seemed spent so I can't see him getting up for AFL selection on a five day break! Matthew Warnock - the pick of the defenders. Played with dash and handled the conditions reasonably well all day. Matthew Whelan - not his best game although he did get better as proceedings went on. Probably needs another run at this level. Sandringham 2.2.14 6.9.45 7.14.56 8.20.68 Box Hill Hawks 8.4.52 11.5.71 12.8.80 12.11.83 Goals Sandringham Newton Sautner 3 Pickett 2 Box Hill Hawks Thorp 4 Little 2 Breese Gibson McEntee Marguccio Moss Tuck Best Sandringham Warnock Pickett Whelan Summers Crowe Garland Box Hill Hawks Kennedy Renouf Thorp Breese Thurgood Smith Report Sandringham Jace Bode for misconduct (kneeing) G. Moss from Box Hill in the first quarter. The reserves turned the tables on Box Hill when they led all day to run out 21 point victors. Tomi Johnston picked up five goals and was the best small man on the ground while his former Sandringham Dragons teammate and Victorian Under 18 representative Sam Monaghan shone all day. Daniel Hayes was again prominent and looks full of promise. Sandringham 4.5.29 10.8.68 12.12.84 14.20.104 Box Hill Hawks 3.6.24 6.7.43 9.10.64 12.11.83 Goals Sandringham Johnston 5 Gileno Gribbin 2 Gilchrist Hayes Martyn Turcarelli Zarra Box Hill Hawks Cook Conyers 3 Hill 2 Collins Daniher King Marcius Best Sandringham Monaghan Hayes Martyn Johnston Gilchrist Tregear Box Hill Hawks O'Sullivan Marcius Augustin Weinert King Conyers

AMBUSHED by Barry from Beach Road Sandringham succumbed to the wind, the rain and a far more committed and disciplined Box Hill Hawks at the Trevor Barker Beach Road Oval on Sunday. The Hawks won the hard slog in difficult conditions by 15 points pushing the Zebras from first to third place on the VFL ladder. Box Hill took advantage of the best conditions of a bad day for football and booted eight goals to virtually seal the game by quarter time. After Sandy spearhead Nick Sautner scored the first goal of the day against the wind, a touch of arrogance crept into the Zebra makeup. The team dropped its guard for a fatal ten minutes and was ambushed by a determined Box Hill combination. During that period, the visitors had all the answers while the home side stumbled and made some fundamental errors like kicking short into the wind and to a contest, leaving the goal square unguarded for a couple of goals and giving away needless free kicks within scoring distance of the opposition's goal. They fell right into Box Hill's trap and by the time the siren sounded to end the opening stanza, trailed by 38 points. There were very few players able to hold their heads high in the huddle but to their credit the Zebras managed to regroup after the first break but there was a problem. They had given away too great a lead and had to play catch up football all the way to the final siren and while they managed to whittle down the Box Hill lead in every quarter, poor kicking for goal dented any chance they may have held for victory. The fact that Box Hill kicked only four goals after the first break and still managed a relatively comfortable winning margin tells most of the story. The rest of the story is that Sandringham was sloppy in front of goal and, despite looking stronger around the ground for the last three quarters, it allowed the Hawks to dictate how the game was being played. Sandy was often forced wide and struggled to go direct even with the wind. The result was a wasteful result on the scoreboard. This wastefulness was accentuated when Box Hill kicked the last two goals of the opening half against the wind. These goals were to prove invaluable in the final wash up. The Zebra cause was not assisted by the elements, particularly after half time when the rains came down and scoring was made all the more difficult. Sandy had more of the play and even outscored Box Hill when kicking against the wind in the third quarter, but the top heavy forward line simply couldn't find the goals often enough. Perhaps, a smaller crumber like Tomi Johnston who booted five in the reserves might have helped on the day. Meanwhile, Box Hill's only goal of the second half was a long booming shot with the wind after a free kick was awarded against the Zebras for a ruck infringement Despite a noticeable lift in intensity in the final term from the likes of Peter Summers and Matthew Whelan, the Zebra efforts were smothered and stifled by a disciplined defensive Box Hill outfit intent on keeping them at bay. The strategy worked with the Hawks wasting away the final minutes while Sandringham tried unsuccessfully to push for goals. They managed to score one solitary major with a strong wind at their backs in the final quarter. Better Sandy players on the day were Matthew Warnock and Andy Biddlecombe (although outsized by bigger opponents). They held the defence together under difficult conditions along with young Colin Garland who assisted them manfully and showed loads of promise. Summers in the middle and Rod Crowe up forward were good contributors. Unfortunately, eight goals from 28 shots at goal (more if you count a couple that went out of bounds on the full) is not the sort of dividend that helps to secure victory. In its past two matches Sandringham has posted 23 goals 37 behinds to 24.17. The forwards will need to be more accurate with their disposal if they are to overcome old rival Port Melbourne at TEAC Oval on Sunday. The Borough hit top form and destroyed Werribee at the same ground last week while Sandy has lost two out of its last three outings putting it under more intense pressure than at any time since its triple premiership run began in 2004. HOW THE DEMONS FARED Jace Bode - tried hard but failed to impress and finished on the umpire's report sheet. Simon Buckley - flashed in and out of the play and looked good at times but wasn't able to stamp his authority on the game. Lynden Dunn - just went in the dismal conditions and never looked like being a threatening player. Colin Garland - you would expect a Tasmanian to do well in these conditions and he didn't let the team down. Played exceptionally well when his side was under fire in the first half. Chris Johnson - started at half back, was injured early in the game and replaced before quarter time not to be seen again for the day. The injury appears to be a hamstring and he looks like being out for a few weeks. Brad Miller - frozen out early, then on and off the ground as coach Williams juggled his top heavy forward line around. Never really got going which was a major disappointment after last week's six goal performance. Shane Neaves - lowered his colours in the ruck and was, at best, patchy around the ground. Michael Newton - started the game on the bench but when he got his opportunity on the ground he was more than useful. Kicked three goals, worked his butt off and went in hard enough for the ball in an attempt to satisfy his AFL coach to consider him this week given the skipper's out with a broken thumb. Would be better if he could time his leaps for the big marks a bit better and not attempt a screamer at every available half opportunity. Byron Pickett - not even the striped jumper could hide the fact that he's still carrying a bit too much in the girth. Was among the best early, intimidated a few Box Hill defenders and kicked a magnificent goal on the run in the second quarter. However, by the final quarter, he seemed spent so I can't see him getting up for AFL selection on a five day break! Matthew Warnock - the pick of the defenders. Played with dash and handled the conditions reasonably well all day. Matthew Whelan - not his best game although he did get better as proceedings went on. Probably needs another run at this level. Sandringham 2.2.14 6.9.45 7.14.56 8.20.68 Box Hill Hawks 8.4.52 11.5.71 12.8.80 12.11.83 Goals Sandringham Newton Sautner 3 Pickett 2 Box Hill Hawks Thorp 4 Little 2 Breese Gibson McEntee Marguccio Moss Tuck Best Sandringham Warnock Pickett Whelan Summers Crowe Garland Box Hill Hawks Kennedy Renouf Thorp Breese Thurgood Smith Report Sandringham Jace Bode for misconduct (kneeing) G. Moss from Box Hill in the first quarter. The reserves turned the tables on Box Hill when they led all day to run out 21 point victors. Tomi Johnston picked up five goals and was the best small man on the ground while his former Sandringham Dragons teammate and Victorian Under 18 representative Sam Monaghan shone all day. Daniel Hayes was again prominent and looks full of promise. Sandringham 4.5.29 10.8.68 12.12.84 14.20.104 Box Hill Hawks 3.6.24 6.7.43 9.10.64 12.11.83 Goals Sandringham Johnston 5 Gileno Gribbin 2 Gilchrist Hayes Martyn Turcarelli Zarra Box Hill Hawks Cook Conyers 3 Hill 2 Collins Daniher King Marcius Best Sandringham Monaghan Hayes Martyn Johnston Gilchrist Tregear Box Hill Hawks O'Sullivan Marcius Augustin Weinert King Conyers

COLIN WISBEY'S 2006 NATIONAL DRAFT PREDICTIONS - PART ONE Internet draft wizz kid Colin Wisbey has finally put together his predictions for the 2006 AFL National Draft selections. Here they are in full (and look out for the surprise twist at the end for Demon fans): PREFACE Because I pulled the plug early on posting my profiles at draft time, I've been re-writing my predictions list to include more comprehensive detail for most players than I normally would. This is taking a lot longer than I had anticipated, having to fit it in with more important work priorities. My predictions are based entirely on pre-draft. No consideration has been given to anything that has occurred since then. PREDICTIONS FOR "UNDER 18" 2006 AFL DRAFTEES I judge them to have "made AFL" when they have played a decent number of good AFL games over a sustained period (i.e. not merely getting games when their club's list is decimated by injuries, or due to just their size or pace presenting them with premature opportunities). The categories generally reflect players about whom I feel most confident in making predictions. This was a terrific draft, somewhat like 2001 but with greater depth. I believe there are many serious bargains in that I feel some clubs paid a very high price for certain players and that some others who I consider "sure fire" AFL were allowed to slip because they weren't a sexy height etc. In my honest opinion Essendon did very well in this "bargains" area. The following format is "Player (actual draft pick and club) [my pre-draft ranking]". Note: My ranking number does not necessarily reflect the draft pick I would use or would be necessary. (eg You don't pay a higher draft pick price than you think will be needed to get the player). In designating a ranking number, I try to come up a number that reflects both the relative upside and risk/concerns. Every Recruiting Manager (and staff) wrestles with the same exercise. eg You might think a player has great upside but that there is a significant doubt/concern about his likelihood of achieving it (perhaps through concerns about his current commitment or ability to overcome a current chronic injury etc). You might think another player has less upside but you are far more confident of him achieving it. Which player do you rank higher / get keener on? Furthermore, as of this draft I'm against ranking any specialist ruck in top 15 anyway. (Rucks tend to be more injury prone, take longer to return on investment, are more likely to have queries re bulking up, and there is historically a disproportionate success rate of late ruck picks over early ones). CATEGORY ONE - WILL BE TOP SHELF (roughly in the order of their upside but allowing for my level of confidence in them achieving it): GIBBS, Bryce (1 Carlton) [1] Standout. The footballer's footballer. Class midfielder. Very bottom-age but plug 'n play. Rises to the occasion. Quality kid with a professional approach to his footy already. Only flaws are "somewhat" one-sidedness (although he is one of those smart footballers who, through ability to think his way out of trouble, manages to avoid getting exposed) and lack of zip. Neither will cause him great concern at AFL level because he is smart enough to know where to run and how to cut the angles, and he has a great work-rate both ways (although needs to pay his own opponent more respect). He is neither as slow as his reputation would suggest nor quite as quick as his DC times suggest. The type who will surprise you by finishing up with 30 disposals when you might have guessed about 18. Not the type to carry the ball 50m or break the play open in the manner of a Judd but he just keeps on getting his own ball, keeps being in the right place at the right time, and routinely makes the smart decisions and has all the right hurt factors. There has been no more fail-safe AFL gun prospect since Griffen who I rate the most fail-safe since Hodge/Judd/Ball. In '06 SANFL Seniors, was named in the best in an incredible 10 of his 16 games (although surprisingly receiving Margery Medal votes in just 2), despite only turning 17 in March '06. Classy players are sometimes not noted for their tackling. Gibbs however regularly has a high tackle count and he is a very effective tackler. HAWKINS, Tom (41 Geelong) [2] Will be a gun FF/CHF. Already a man mountain but huge scope once chiselled down and conditioned. Style-wise, think of an early Lockett but who is team-orientated and works very hard both ways. Will take plenty of marks and kick plenty of goals but his career will also be noted for what he does to create opportunities for team-mates. Good hurt factors. Right footer (thumping kick) who rarely uses his left although he is actually quite good on it. Is often described as slow. He is no gazelle but his pace is underrated and I have no concerns whatsoever re his pace for AFL. He does nothing half-paced - he goes full bore and gets the most out of whatever his legs can produce. Terrific ethic and intensity, and not just for a huge man. Routinely chases and chases full bore. eg In game 2 of U18 Champs, chased a WA player for 70m, passing a team mate who couldn't be bothered - opponent had 15m start but Hawkins chased desperately and actually almost caught the opponent (who admittedly was running 3/4 pace). Mouth-watering prospect. JETTA, Leroy (18 Essendon) [5] Great talent if chooses to apply himself. X-factor. Better know by some as a quick, creative, flashy forward but, once he gets his tank right, I believe he will be a gun mid-fielder. Clever, courageous game-breaker. Fairly good decision-making and disposal (although sometimes bites off more than he can chew). Unaccountable, perhaps selfish, and off-field ethic (including time management, commitment) needs improvement. Jetta has been mad keen for AFL centre stage but has yet to embrace the same level of enthusiasm for the hard work and off-field self discipline required for AFL success. His natural game is based more on flamboyance than work ethic but, if he is prepared to get himself in top condition, there is no reason why he can't be very consistent. Immature personality but I've always felt he needed the AFL stage to bring out the best in him. Potential to be the next Kerr (and not just in style). Bargain pick, despite current immaturity. PROUD, Albert (22 Brisbane) [4] Tough, pacy, aggressive, consistent. Ethic, intensity, smarts, physical presence. Chases hard (excellent closing speed), hits hard. Because of his late start to '06 (foot operation) and O.P., he was in poor condition at DC (albeit probably too poor) so I'm not reading anything into his DC athletic results, especially poor endurance times. In my pre-draft profile I suggested "those results might encourage enough clubs to overlook him early draft and see him slipping in the order a bit, providing a bargain to the club who takes him". Would be plug 'n play if free of injury (esp O.P.) and fit. Showed better temper control in '06. Will lift his team when all around him are falling. Style-wise, picture an early Ricciuto. Is somewhat one-sided but his disposal, although not faultless, is fairly reliable. Genuine footballer and has the pace that many of the touted mids this year lack. HOULI, Bachar (42 Essendon) [8] Injury-prone (only major AFL query is durability) but smart, classy midfielder/HFF. Very good OHF and NHF (negative hurt factor). Not outside per se but, so far, has played the game on his own terms at his own pace, Predator style "off the pack" a la Shakleton,, and is on good terms with himself. Very footy-smart and potentially more athletic than his appearance/style have suggested. I've always suspected he treated underage footy with almost contempt. Will leave no stone unturned and I believe he will not only shine at AFL level but show us a more rounded game (re on-field work rate). Historical concerns re his endurance and pace but I am convinced that, when injury-free, he will have excellent endurance and quite good pace. Absolute bargain. DJERRKURA, Nathan (25 Geelong) [9] 176cm electrifying, fierce, dynamic, quick, clean, take-them-on, relentless ball-carrying dasher. Byron Picket with some Wirrpanda. Breaks the play open. Exciting combination of speed, motor, attack, physicality and natural footballer ability. Despite his height, I think he is likely to be something special. X-factor. Trademarks are (1) Come from nowhere to run opponent down with excellent closing speed and fierce tackle ("silent assassin" ), (2) Take-them-on dash then kick into forward 50 (if not nailed in the process!). Other main selling points are intensity, balance, contested ball ability, agility, endurance, overhead, consistency, evasion, traffic management, versatility. Gives away an avg 3 frees per game, virtually all through either (over-)ambitiously taking opponents on and getting nailed, or through over-zealous tackles. He's a smart kid and I'm confident he will learn to be more judicious. Regardless, even though 3 FAs a game is not what a coach would normally like to see, I think it is more than balanced by the pressure he puts opponents under (a la Davey, but with brutality) and the number of times he is actually successful in breaking the play open with his daring. i.e. If you want the benefits of his attack on the man and opening up of the play, you should expect to have to wear occasional slip-ups. Benefit greatly outweighs cost in Djerrkura's case. (I'd rather a kid who dares to dare than one who plays introverted). He is as quick as any '06 draftee. He is as good and as reliable in the air as most of the other good smalls/mediums who are good overhead. Usually a good kick and his disposals often hurt. Has the dash, daring and hurt factor you want from an outside player, the hardness and in-close ability you want from an inside player, plays tall, is versatile, is footballer and athlete in equal doses, is a great kid who will be very coachable, and doesn't have a "go home" query. Add endurance, physicality and ethic (both ways) to that and IMHO no other kid in this draft can lay better claim to that package of traits. I'm less hung up on height than many people are. Recent premiership teams, Brownlow high voters and AA teams prove there is always a place for a smaller player if he is special enough in certain areas or as a package. I rated Djerrkura quite a lot earlier than I knew he would go but am very confident he will be very good AFL. Except for (arguably) height, he is made for today's game and could play anywhere down the flanks. Probably best suited to HBF or wing in his early AFL days. Could play BP too but I believe his talents are best utilised where he can afford more risks. In the backline, will be able to supply both Pickett-like pressure as well as plenty of run out of defence and hardball get ability. Down the track I think he could be a good AFL onballer. Has the capacity to potentially be a run-with or even an inside mid. No doubts about his tank or speed or hardness and he is quite clean under pressure (both getting and disposing). And he should be virtually plug 'n play. Bargain. SELWOOD, Joel (7 Geelong) [11] First Dibs midfielder. Elite play-reader with great ability to win the ball and to pressure opponents from winning it cleanly. Very balanced genuine footballer. Excellent vision, smarts, very good by hand, strong overhead. Gets to a helluva lot of contests and very competitive in any type of contest, ground level or overhead, regardless of pressure, and against different types of opponents. If I had to describe him in "one" word it would probably be either "relentless" or "highly-competitive". Has most of the typical Selwood traits (courage, ethic, endurance, competitiveness, overhead, lack of pace) but has much better decision-making than the twins. His kicking is also better, albeit not one of his strengths. SELLAR, James (14 Adelaide) [3] 195cm skilled, well-built footballer with athleticism, smarts, hands, disposal. Flaky '06, intensity query but you don't physically lose what he had displayed prior. Very bottom-age. I'm prepared to virtually ignore '06 as he apparently had to endure various on and off-field difficulties. In the '04 and '05 U16 Champs, I considered him even more impressive than Gibbs. Started 2006 as #1 in my rankings (Gibbs #2). In the end, Gibbs' performances were just so compelling, and without the queries that Sellar's '06 form raised, that I had to slip Sellar behind but I dropped off him only marginally. Even in his "disappointing" '06, he kicked 4g in 1st half of his 1st SANFL Seniors game (as CHF!), beat the highly rated Gumbleton as CHB, and averaged 17 disposals in the U18 Champs. (How many 195cm types, let alone any who had just lost 8kg through illness, do that in any U18 Champs?). By comparison, we were all quite satisfied with the Champs form of Gumbleton, Hansen and Leunberger, and they averaged 15, 13, and 11 disposals respectively and Sellar's disposal was the best of the lot. He even had 15d in just the 2nd 1/2 of one Champs game (albeit as virtually a loose wingman). Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. He did NOT have a disappointing year for a bottom-age 195cm kid, even a highly rated one. He just had a disappointing year for Sellar, based on our expectations of him specifically. Why did we have such high expectations? Because of the talent he had shown over a 2 year period prior to that. I suspect he has a personal issue to conquer but I would have taken him on the assumption that he can, such is his upside. Should be very versatile but especially has the makings of an outstanding CHB (although his preference is CHF). An exciting, and rare, combination of not only leap, 195cm, marking strength, defensive and negating skills, cool head and smarts but, importantly, the pace and confidence to give regular run and linking out of defence and roost the ball long to a target. I foresee him regularly turning defence into goal-scoring opportunities. I also think he is more suited to the straight ahead aspects of CHB than the "stop/start" of CHF. Excellent ruck skills and could well be a good AFL ruckman/follower a la Goodes (without the freakishness), despite being only 195cm, as he has such a big leap and athleticism and he seems to enjoy ruck contests. Has virtually all the attributes of a modern CHF also and I do rate him highly in that role. Makes the right decisions. Good evasion. Good vision and disposal (including depth), even on the run. Good hurt factors. Trademarks are (1) Fluency - in everything. (Always looks to be doing every action "on the bit", effortlessly). (2) One-grab mark, positioning and timing well, then either a quick, accurate feed or immediately run off his opponent and do a fluent, long, probably accurate kick. (3) Run to link, moving with arms stiff and hanging down, seemingly moving in slow motion until you notice the opponent struggling to keep up. THORP, Mitchell (6 Hawthorn) [6] Versatile tall. Main selling points are contested marking, fantastic endurance / ground coverage, clean hands, vision, spoiling. Accountable, footy smart in many respects. Good courage and wins more than his share of hardball/contested gets. '06 form overall was good but not quite as impressive as I'd hoped but he didn't really do a pre-season (due to O.P., which he is now on top of). Huge leap, very strong overhead (although I would like to see him try to protect the ball a bit more often when possible, a la Carey, instead of taking the ball directly above or a bit behind his head). Young for his age but potential Chris Grant if he stops getting ahead of himself. I rate Thorp behind only Hawkins and Sellar as the best KPP "potential package" in this draft. Capable of making CHF a "permanent" role at AFL but might be best suited to CHB. Main query as a defender would be whether a quick leading forward might show him up for pace over the first few metres. His pace is a little hard to judge as he has had O.P. and also, although he covers a lot of ground, he is not noted for hard chasing or ball-carrying and he sometimes, at least at U18 level, seems casual. I'm comfortable with his pace over a distance - for his size. There have been times when he has looked a little tardy and the main concern would be the 1st few metres. Some surprising pace when he wants to pull it out. eg in a 40m run to the loose ball, Thorp gave Petterd a few metres start but got there first and both seemed flat out. In a VFL game, Thorp kept up with Baird (his opponent) in a 25m run to the ball. Baird recorded a 3.00sec 20m and a 0.96sec 5m time a few years ago. On the other hand, Thorp was left in the wake of another VFL player on a number of occasions in one game when playing FB(?) whenever that player was on a lead. I query there though, how much was due to lack of pace on Thorp's part and how much was due to poor anticipation of, and reaction to, the opponent's take-off on the lead. Kicking is currently mixed bag but has the potential to be very good and I'm confident will be. Sometimes he seems a bit too casual under no pressure. Genuinely dual-sided. Nice economical, fluent kicking style, good depth. I noticed at 1/4, 3/4 time huddles that he seemed intelligent and very switched on. When deciding to carry the ball, he has a fairly regular tendency (more often at U18 level than VFL) to ignore the nearby presence of an opponent and approach his kick preparation as if he was in complete space (through arrogance? lack of awareness?) and becomes vulnerable to being bumped from the side as he kicks, to the detriment of his kicking effectiveness. He has some evasive ability and I'd like to see him work harder in those situations to create space before kicking. At the very least, he often takes a bit too long to dispose and his lateral awareness in such situations is not great. Thorp is very committed and I would have drafted him myself and prepared to part with a pick as early as #3 (Hawkins not being available) if I strongly wanted a KP and felt such an early pick was necessary. However, if height didn't need to factor into drafting considerations, I would prefer to take either Jetta or Proud (not that anything like pick #3 was ever going to be needed for them). CATEGORY TWO - WILL BE AT LEAST GOOD (I didn't bother too much about the order but its very (!) roughly in the order of their upside, with some allowance for my level of confidence in them achieving it): (Some are extremely late picks but I call it as I see it). HANSEN, Lachlan (3 Kangaroos) [7] Likely AFL long-termer (probably CHB) and would have been my #4 if not for disappointing OHF (offensive hurt factor) due to iffy kicking and tunnel vision on the run. (Needs to more frequently look for options to feed off to, tends to too often just get and kick long and direct without displaying good vision or looking for best option). Even when not on the run, is too inclined to kick off virtually one step. Very strong overhead (hands, judgement, balance). Excellent endurance / coverage, ethic, courage. Pace when injury-free is at least "OK", although a bit slower than his DC times suggest. Backs his endurance and loves to run his opponent up and around the ground. Missed a couple of weeks with a hip complaint prior to '06 U18 Champs (cleaned up post-draft) and I felt he never looked completely free in his movement for the rest of the season, despite generally good form. HISLOP, Tom (20 Essendon) [10] Aggressive powerhouse. Plug n play. Versatile bullish onballer/flanker who can play small or above his height, has fairly good pace, takes no prisoners, always gives a contest and gets a lot of contested ball but currently doesn't look for, take or hit the right option often enough - too often kicks long instead of looking for short options (hand or foot). Other main concern AFL-wise might be over-aggression. Main selling points are physicality, competitiveness, courage, intensity, overhead, endurance, balance, strength, consistency. Trademarks are (1) Hardball get, then hurried disposal, (2) Crunch a pack or an opponent, perhaps taking a very strong mark that he has no right to take. Often clean, especially at ground level in "static" situations (although not "routinely: clean overall). If not for the somewhat high number of blind and other inaccurate kicks, I would rank him about #5. I love his competitiveness and aggression at both man and ball but he must start getting better return from his possession tally. Kicking was better in VFL than at U18. He is not a bad kick per se. Good depth and dual-sided. The issue is reliability. Kicking style needs work. He tilts to the left, which limits your error margin over a short distance, and his arm movements need work. IMHO it is important for both arms to work virtually in sync, helping your body stay balanced, both laterally and vertically. Hislop's arms are way out of synch and affect his centre-of-mass transfer and his ability to kick directly through the ball. Left arm often spends time bent at 90 degrees upwards then comes forward and across his body, while his right arm stays back, hangs down and does nothing. By the end of his kick he is often off-balance. Those faults should be fairly "easily" fixed and will make a big difference to his kicking reliability. Hislop and Armitage are similar types, age, great endurance and both are virtually plug 'n play. Both courageous hardnuts with good work rate and both with sub-optimal disposal. Hislop has more pace, is a bit physically stronger, and is the better kick. Hislop arguably has greater impact too. I would definitely take Hislop over Armitage, much as I admire Armitage. Jetta is X-factor vs risk but is a very quick, electrifying magician and is capable of being a quality user (not that he is yet). Hislop is none of those but he will deliver for you every time, whereas Jetta will switch on when it suits him. Jetta's pace, daring, flair and disposal makes him potentially much more of an impact player. Hislop is more a player who stops the opposition having impact through his hardness at man and ball but he too can turn a game. Likes to take opponents on and carry the ball and is often, although not routinely, judicious. Astute in corralling an opponent but usually prefers the bone-crunching tackle or bump. I have been impressed re how very switched on and intelligent he is at the 1/4, 3/4 huddles. With ever-increasing sophistication of team game plans, being able to be on the same page as the coach is more important than ever. Exceptionally strong overhead for his size, especially the big screamer from behind but can mark from any angle/position and attacks his marks / hits the pack like there's no tomorrow. He is on the slower end of the "quick midfielder" scale rather than the quicker end of the "slightly slowish midfielder" scale. Probably best suited to HBF or onball but, despite being only 184cm, is versatile enough to play anywhere down the flanks. Could be exposed by a very quick or very tall opponent but, even then, is likely to be at least mainly competitive, such is his ability to play tall yet also have enough pace and smarts to know where to run, how to cut angles and how to pressure both aerially and at ground level. Has the motor and competitiveness to become an excellent run-with (in time) and that's the role in which I possibly favour him. ARMITAGE, David (9 St. Kilda) [19] Smart goer with heart, motor. Iffy pace. Definite AFL but MUST improve kicking. TIPPETT, Kurt (32 Adelaide) [12] Versatile, mobile newby ruck/KP. Works hard. No very major fault. 19yo but big upside. I'm generally sceptical about kids who are in their first year of footy. That's because such kids usually show only tiny snippets that excite you. I'm far less willing than many are to extrapolate from such little data, no matter how impressed I may have been with the kid's snippets. With Tippett, he has shown a lot, not just random cameos. I think he has terrific potential. What really impresses me is the amount of footy smarts he already has, albeit that he is still in the early stages of the learning curve. Although still raw, I doubt anyone who knew nothing about him would realise when they first saw him play that he was new to footy. 201cm types who are likely to be able to play any KP or ruck, have the pace of a quite quick midfielder, are physically virtually plug 'n play, can leap over tall buildings, can get their own ball, are at least competitive overhead, have a sharp brain and have the ethics/intensity of an inside mid don't grow on trees. Many of the things I like about Tippett would be good in any player but I could add "especially for 201cm" to a lot of my comments. I am rating him as a ruck who can play KP but I would be almost as confident rating him as a KPP who can ruck. I rate him "definite" AFL, despite being a newby. DICK, Brad (44 Collingwod) [24] Enigmatic but magical when en song. Risky ranking but huge upside EDWARDS, Shane (26 Richmond) [26] Skinny but nimble, slick, innovative, goes hard. Ranked on upside COLLARD, Clayton (31 Fremantle) [13] Highly skilled midfielder/ flanker. Painfully shy and naive about the workload required for AFL so will need quality mentoring but definitely has AFL ability. Query re ability to adapt so is some risk but he has big upside, class and some X-factor. Other main selling points are X-factor, smarts / vision, clean hands, evasion, balance, overhead. Trademarks are (1) Vacuum the ball off the carpet on the run, take on and perhaps make a fool of the oncoming opponent, then dob a nice goal or set a team mate up to do so, (2) Screamer. He might lose concentration before getting to the last page of the team's play book but, for every hair he might make you tear out, he'll give you a moment where you will feel smug that he is on your list. Has mainly played outside roles (HFF) but I am confident he will furnish into an inside mid option in time if/when he can get his endurance up enough. I compare him in style somewhat to Tyson Edwards but I also think he will be able (in time) to play all the roles that Tyson has played. Has always lived in the shadow, on and off-field, of his best mate, Jetta, It's often "Jetta, the star footballer, and his mate Collard". If both play AFL and get the most out of themselves, I believe Jetta will be the better player but with Collard probably not far behind. There seems a tendency in recruiting circles to talk as if Jetta is Collard's better performed younger brother. However Collard was the better performed in WAFL Seniors, was also named in '06 WA Seniors (!) state squad, and Jetta is actually 5 months older. On sheer ability, I rate Collard's AFL potential as "Definite" and only one aspect made me downgrade him to "Likely", viz "How well and quickly is he likely to settle in and feel like he belongs?". My only other significantly concern is the O.P. he has been battling. His DC weight was listed as 86kg but his fighting weight would currently be around 80kg. He "couldn't" (?) keep himself in good condition while suffering O.P. late season. Career-wise, Collard and Jetta getting split up into different states may be the best thing for both boys. Clayton can stop living in Leroy's shadow and that will be a watershed point in his development. I would definitely have been prepared to draft him with a pick around my ranking if necessary (not that it ever would have been). Assuming he settles in reasonably OK (!!), I am confident Collard will make as big a splash as most of this draft's first rounders, perhaps ready to debut in '07. HARBROW, Jarrod (R27 Western Bulldogs) [29] Clever slick improver. Risk but I'm more a fan than others are. GRIGG, Shaun (19 Carlton) [39] Consistent tall mid but burns ball way too often by foot. I have identified basic flaws in his kicking technique which should be fixable. If I somehow knew for certain that such flaws would be identified and fixed, he'd be one of the first be in this category, would have earned a very much earlier ranking from me, and I would have confidently labelled him "definite AFL 200 gamer". Kicking is probably his only major flaw as he is otherwise a very attractive package. His current kicking reliability is almost a show-stopper though. THOMAS, Lindsay (53 Kangaroos) [27] Top-age surprise early ranking but clever & works both ways. Needs endurance ADAMS, Leigh (R 3 Kangaroos) [35] Rover/FP/BP. Smart, inside. Honesty over class but no real flaw. LEUENBERGER, Matthew (4 Brisbane) [16] Promising ruck. Query balance but ... KRAKOUER, Nathan (39 Port Adelaide) [48] Lightning. Great user, smarts. If 75kg, serious AFL and would be in my top category. 61kg the only worry but a huge one. He will literally have to create history (re the modern era) as his BMI represents easily the skinniest build on record. His diet opportunities will be better now and that's the big hope. MOSS, Gary (56 Hawthorn) [17] Skinny & not lightning but every kg is footballer. Likely bargain due to build. URQUHART, Gavin (21 Kangaroos) [28] OP killed his '06 but definite AFL potential HBF. O.P. worries me and he makes this category on the explicit assumption that he overcomes his O.P.. REIMERS, Kyle (47 Essendon) [21] Take-them-on ball-carrying utility. Good overhead. Iffy decision-making but has real flair and presence and has been a rapid improver both on and off-field (and the latter in particular needed to improve). Still has to be a query re ability to meet the off-field demands of a professional AFL footballer so I can understand why he wasn't taken until pick 47 but I ranked him much earlier on the assumption that he will choose to sustain his recent improvement trend in this aspect. ANDERSON, Joseph (67 Carlton) [15] Rapidly improving 188cm, virtually bottom-age, hard-running utility. Still raw, not silky, but made for today's game. Great endurance, "handy" pace, huge leap, reads the play well, knows how to find the pill, routinely looks for best option, fairly often delivers accurately, is courageous and crashes packs. Proven himself against men. Main queries (all mentality-related) are: plays off the pack / too reactive / too Predator, defensive smarts, accountability. I've ranked him mainly on upside. He still has a heap of improvement in him. The sealers for me were (1) he will leave no stone unturned (2) his rapid improvement since mid '05 including radical changes to his on-field presence, impact, and physical attributes. Even if he can't fix the flaws I've identified, he still has enough going for him to be a fairly handy 60-100 gamer. In the '05 U18 and subsequent '05 U16 Champs I observed he was vanilla-size and build, introverted and played vanilla and introverted. I was staggered to hear that, just 8 months later, he won Darwin Seniors B&F (as 17yo) and was runner-up to Daryl White for B&F medal in the '06 NT Seniors GF. Come the '06 TAC trials, I couldn't believe the dramatic transformation. He was now a few centimetres taller, had filled out really well, had significantly lifted his pace, and played with a flair, confidence and physicality that were virtually non-existent a year earlier. Even his appearance and persona were markedly different. I was very impressed with what he did at the '06 U18 Champs, and quite impressed with much from his lead-up games. However I was still less than impressed with what he did NOT do. Much of the time, he played virtually loose man across half-back, presumably to coach's instructions, which makes assessing him a bit more difficult. He was still too reactive a bit too often and still a bit too often "played off the pack". In AFL he won't be able to wait to see how the play in his immediate area unfolds before deciding to involve himself, or letting an opponent have first crack, or not displaying appropriate defensive effort or defensive smarts. He is not a "natural footy brain for all situations" type like M Voss but he does sometimes displays a quickish brain. He strikes me as the 2yo colt who has all the energy in the world and looks a real prospect but needs more racing experience to knock some rough edges off and you're not quite sure what distance will suit him best in the long term but you reckon he moves better than most of the other colts in the paddock. His package has so many potential goodies in it that are at least at the 80% stage that, even if he doesn't later shine in a couple of the aspects I expect him to, he will still be value for his other attributes. I would have drafted him myself, although he was never going to need a pick as early as my ranking denoted. Suited to HBF where he can give some run and linking. "Wing" should suit too. Unlikely onballer (unless perhaps as run-with, in time). Will probably turn out to be a bargain. WELLINGHAM, Sharrod (R10 Collingwood) [37] Promising ball magnet. Slippery, smart. Quick but should carry ball more. Upside BEDFORD, Liam (R23 Geelong) [38] Skinny, outside, slippery, quick, clean. Needs to do more. Punt on upside vs wt SMITH, Chris (R13 Fremantle) [34] Honest, committed, versatile. No obvious fault, no special strength. Underrated. Additional comments: HAYES, Daniel (R12 MEL) [] Has the football ability to be in this group. A troubled outside flashy wing/HFF who, regardless of ability, needs 10 mentors. Way too risky for me to even consider including in my rankings, let alone have confidence in him adapting to AFL requirements.

by the Oracle I've always regarded myself as one of those people who doesn't sit around philosophising on whether my glass is either half full or half empty. However, at this stage of the footy season I'm beginning to have my doubts. I am looking at the Melbourne Football Club's performance to this stage of the year and I find myself staring at a glass so scarce in liquid matter that I can only discern a few drops and that is so disappointing given the high hopes I had just a few months ago. Back in March, I had Melbourne pegged for a third place finish at the end of the home and away series behind Fremantle and Sydney with West Coast making up the top four. It all looked so easy then - beat the Swans first up at Telstra Stadium (where we have never been beaten!), storm into a home Preliminary Final and then knock off the Dockers in front of 100,000 punters at the G to not only avenge last year's semi final humiliation at Subiaco but to recapture the Holy Grail after more than four decades of wallowing in the mire. I now accept that I was badly mistaken. Fremantle win not finish on top of the ladder. In fact, they will struggle to make the finals. As for Melbourne, I'm having my doubts as well. To tell you the truth, I've reached the point of admitting that, despite the mathematical possibility guff I hear, it's over and we're back in wallowing mode. It's a pipedream to suggest that Melbourne might even come close this year - the season's shot and I say that knowing that the Demons don't have to play the three best performed teams in the competition in the run home (four if you count Adelaide after last night's walloping of the Kangaroos). Here's why the mathematics don't work. After eleven completed rounds, the top two sides are Geelong and West Coast with 8 wins and 3 defeats. A rejuvenated Melbourne simply cannot be expected to perform better in the second half than the Cats and the Eagles have done in the first half so the best case scenario for Melbourne is going to be 10 wins for the season. Given that Port Adelaide is currently in 10th place with 6 wins at the half way mark, the best we can hope for is to finish eleventh or twelfth. The only good news that brings with it is that to finish 10/12 after a 0/9 start would make a good springboard for 2008; it would still give the club the 5th or 6th choice in the National Draft. Brock McLean was picked at number 5 in 2003! Speaking about 2003, Melbourne's first half of 2007 is even worse than that year which we all regarded as a horror season. At the halfway mark of that last annus horribilus, the Demons were 14th on the ladder with 3 wins and 8 losses. You have to go back further to 1997 when Joseph Gutnick was President, Neil Balme had just been deposed as coach, Greg Hutchison had a 1 win 1 loss ratio and Garry Lyon was struggling with a bulging disc in his back to find a first half worse than that of 2007. It was only marginally worse however, because ten years ago it was last with a 2/9 record and a percentage of 60.9. There was a mathematic possibility then that the Dees would get up off the floor to make the finals but things didn't work out that way and they finished 4/18 with a percentage of 60.8! In the past three seasons, Melbourne's half way record was at least consistent – 8/3, 8/3 and 7/4 so what went wrong this year and why were we unable to pick it? It probably stems from our wanting to believe what we're told about the club's aims and from accepting that they were capable of being achieved. The reality however, is that all the signs were there that the policy of introducing "run and carry style" might not work. This is not to say that it wasn't worth experimenting with a different style and a different fitness regime in order to achieve it but the problem was that we weren't flexible enough to alter the style when it was clearly not working. We had too much faith! The problems emerged early but we didn't see them clearly enough. The club went into the pre season matches without the benefit of sufficient preparation. The drought curtailed the first intra club match practice during the club's week in the bush. The heat restricted the next hit out at Moorabbin to some shortened quarters that were of little use and the Telstra Dome practice match before Channel 7's watchful cameras was also far too brief. Melbourne went into its the opening NAB Cup match against Hawthorn which had already gone through a few full scale hit outs with close to their best on the park while it had up to 10 of what one would regard as its best 22 missing. Despite that, the Demons were well in control with a few minutes to go in the third quarter with a lead in excess of thirty points. Fact is, they could have been much further in front but for their pitiful execution of the run and carry style. Handballs were landing at players' feet, short passes went nowhere and there was no semblance of cohesion. What happened next is what, in my view, defined the season. In the shadows of a hot three quarter time break, the team relaxed and allowed two 9 pointers and suddenly the Hawks had a sniff. They went on to win and we were making excuses. The experiment continued unabated in the coming weeks as Melbourne took run and carry into the country. While commentating on 5AA during the Mount Gambier practice match against the Crows, Chris McDermott scoffed at what the Demons were doing and declared they "wouldn’t make the eight". Those comments were made relatively early in the piece in a game where Melbourne was slaughtered. The writing was already on the wall. Further, as the practice match series continued, players were starting to succumb to injury and it was becoming obvious that we weren't going to have a full list of players available for the start of the season. The injuries really hit home immediately the season started but they were no excuse for the appalling displays of ineptitude of the opening two or three rounds as Melbourne stumbled and bumbled its way around the ground turning the science of trigonometry on its head seeking to travel short distances by the longest possible route. Any possible momentum for the coming season was lost and, unlike in 2006, there was no chance for recovery after the early defeats. The staggering thing to my mind was that run and carry was persisted with for so long. It should have been shelved or modified well before the opening round. If it was designed to better the team's performances on the longer, narrower grounds interstate, it failed at Subiaco even more badly than it did on the MCG. I believe the problems with the team's playing style have now been checked for the most part. The team is playing more direct football and is executing its moves more precisely than was the case early in the season. Unfortunately, unless miracles happen, it's too late. The horse has bolted.

THE HORSE HAS BOLTED - A MID YEAR REPORT by the Oracle I've always regarded myself as one of those people who doesn't sit around philosophising on whether my glass is either half full or half empty. However, at this stage of the footy season I'm beginning to have my doubts. I am looking at the Melbourne Football Club's performance to this stage of the year and I find myself staring at a glass so scarce in liquid matter that I can only discern a few drops and that is so disappointing given the high hopes I had just a few months ago. Back in March, I had Melbourne pegged for a third place finish at the end of the home and away series behind Fremantle and Sydney with West Coast making up the top four. It all looked so easy then - beat the Swans first up at Telstra Stadium (where we have never been beaten!), storm into a home Preliminary Final and then knock off the Dockers in front of 100,000 punters at the G to not only avenge last year's semi final humiliation at Subiaco but to recapture the Holy Grail after more than four decades of wallowing in the mire. I now accept that I was badly mistaken. Fremantle win not finish on top of the ladder. In fact, they will struggle to make the finals. As for Melbourne, I'm having my doubts as well. To tell you the truth, I've reached the point of admitting that, despite the mathematical possibility guff I hear, it's over and we're back in wallowing mode. It's a pipedream to suggest that Melbourne might even come close this year - the season's shot and I say that knowing that the Demons don't have to play the three best performed teams in the competition in the run home (four if you count Adelaide after last night's walloping of the Kangaroos). Here's why the mathematics don't work. After eleven completed rounds, the top two sides are Geelong and West Coast with 8 wins and 3 defeats. A rejuvenated Melbourne simply cannot be expected to perform better in the second half than the Cats and the Eagles have done in the first half so the best case scenario for Melbourne is going to be 10 wins for the season. Given that Port Adelaide is currently in 10th place with 6 wins at the half way mark, the best we can hope for is to finish eleventh or twelfth. The only good news that brings with it is that to finish 10/12 after a 0/9 start would make a good springboard for 2008; it would still give the club the 5th or 6th choice in the National Draft. Brock McLean was picked at number 5 in 2003! Speaking about 2003, Melbourne's first half of 2007 is even worse than that year which we all regarded as a horror season. At the halfway mark of that last annus horribilus, the Demons were 14th on the ladder with 3 wins and 8 losses. You have to go back further to 1997 when Joseph Gutnick was President, Neil Balme had just been deposed as coach, Greg Hutchison had a 1 win 1 loss ratio and Garry Lyon was struggling with a bulging disc in his back to find a first half worse than that of 2007. It was only marginally worse however, because ten years ago it was last with a 2/9 record and a percentage of 60.9. There was a mathematic possibility then that the Dees would get up off the floor to make the finals but things didn't work out that way and they finished 4/18 with a percentage of 60.8! In the past three seasons, Melbourne's half way record was at least consistent – 8/3, 8/3 and 7/4 so what went wrong this year and why were we unable to pick it? It probably stems from our wanting to believe what we're told about the club's aims and from accepting that they were capable of being achieved. The reality however, is that all the signs were there that the policy of introducing "run and carry style" might not work. This is not to say that it wasn't worth experimenting with a different style and a different fitness regime in order to achieve it but the problem was that we weren't flexible enough to alter the style when it was clearly not working. We had too much faith! The problems emerged early but we didn't see them clearly enough. The club went into the pre season matches without the benefit of sufficient preparation. The drought curtailed the first intra club match practice during the club's week in the bush. The heat restricted the next hit out at Moorabbin to some shortened quarters that were of little use and the Telstra Dome practice match before Channel 7's watchful cameras was also far too brief. Melbourne went into its the opening NAB Cup match against Hawthorn which had already gone through a few full scale hit outs with close to their best on the park while it had up to 10 of what one would regard as its best 22 missing. Despite that, the Demons were well in control with a few minutes to go in the third quarter with a lead in excess of thirty points. Fact is, they could have been much further in front but for their pitiful execution of the run and carry style. Handballs were landing at players' feet, short passes went nowhere and there was no semblance of cohesion. What happened next is what, in my view, defined the season. In the shadows of a hot three quarter time break, the team relaxed and allowed two 9 pointers and suddenly the Hawks had a sniff. They went on to win and we were making excuses. The experiment continued unabated in the coming weeks as Melbourne took run and carry into the country. While commentating on 5AA during the Mount Gambier practice match against the Crows, Chris McDermott scoffed at what the Demons were doing and declared they "wouldn’t make the eight". Those comments were made relatively early in the piece in a game where Melbourne was slaughtered. The writing was already on the wall. Further, as the practice match series continued, players were starting to succumb to injury and it was becoming obvious that we weren't going to have a full list of players available for the start of the season. The injuries really hit home immediately the season started but they were no excuse for the appalling displays of ineptitude of the opening two or three rounds as Melbourne stumbled and bumbled its way around the ground turning the science of trigonometry on its head seeking to travel short distances by the longest possible route. Any possible momentum for the coming season was lost and, unlike in 2006, there was no chance for recovery after the early defeats. The staggering thing to my mind was that run and carry was persisted with for so long. It should have been shelved or modified well before the opening round. If it was designed to better the team's performances on the longer, narrower grounds interstate, it failed at Subiaco even more badly than it did on the MCG. I believe the problems with the team's playing style have now been checked for the most part. The team is playing more direct football and is executing its moves more precisely than was the case early in the season. Unfortunately, unless miracles happen, it's too late. The horse has bolted.

MANO DE DIOS by Whispering Jack More than twenty years have elapsed since Argentinian Diego Maradona scored his "Hand of God" goal in a FIFA World Cup quarter final against England in Mexico. The goal happened because of a simple error from the referee who missed seeing the outside of the Argentinian's left fist as it made contact with the ball that subsequently careered into the net for a goal. Five minutes later, Maradona scored another one - later voted the greatest goal in World Cup history - when he eluded five English outfield players (Hoddle, Reid, Sansom, Butcher and Fenwick) as well as goalkeeper Shilton. Although England scored through Gary Lineker in the 81st minute, Argentina won the match 2-1, went on to take the 1986 World Cup and ever since, the English have been moaning and groaning about that infamous goal. I have a feeling that, in the decades to come, Collingwood supporters will also be complaining about Russell Robertson's hands on the back of Magpie defender Alan Toovey and how he was able to escape detection at a vital point in the last quarter of the Melbourne v Collingwood game on Queens Birthday 2007. Robbo kicked the goal after being awarded the controversial mark and the Demons regained their control over the game. When asked on 3AW after the game if he "got away with one", he replied: "Yeah, I think I did." "Them's the breaks," as they say in the classics. The umpire didn't see Robbo's Hand of God so the decision to pay him the mark was a correct one. The umpires can't be relied upon to make guesses and these things ebb and flow from game to game and during any particular game. Anyway, the record shows that Collingwood had a good run from the umpires on the day kicking three of their 11 goals from frees while Melbourne received none. Like Diego Maradonna all those years before him, Robbo was the match-winner on this day for more reasons than the Hand of God; there was plenty of brilliance from the high flyer who saw off at least three opponents and could easily have kicked ten for the day bar for some goalkicking yippery in the third quarter when he scored three points in a row. Melbourne's 13 point victory has been threatening for a while now. Leaving aside its disasterous trip to Perth, the form line has been encouraging as the team struggled to salvage something out of a season partly derailed by a spate of injuries to key players and partly through a new game style they struggled to get right. Robbo himself missed several games as a result of a knee injury incurred in Round 2, as did David Neitz. The inspirational Brock McLean was also missing for most of the first half of the season, his value to the team only becoming apparent by his exploits on the field once he returned a few weeks ago. Others like Jared Rivers, Matthew Whelan and Brent Moloney are still out of the side but things have been coming together nicely and, for at least one quarter of each of their last three games, the team has clicked. Heaven help an opponent, if they can do it for four quarters! While Robbo was THE hero, there were many unsung heroes on the day. The Demons' makeshift defence, filled with players who are either very young or alternatively, unfashionable as footballers performed magnificently. At the start of the season, we thought we might see very little of Ben Holland, Clint Bizzell and Daniel Ward - they're certainly not in the silky smooth department and yet they gave their all and a lot more on Monday. Blue collar Nathan Carroll belied his connection with the silver tailed Demons against the working class Magpies and Simon Godfrey added yet another scalp to his belt (and his finessing for a goal early in the game was sensational). Daniel Bell turned the tables on Alan Didak (who might have gone home wishing the Tribunal hadn't let him off the hook last week) and he is fast gaining recognition as one of the competition's rising defenders. Then there were youngsters in Ricky Petterd and James Frawley, both in their debut seasons and with plenty to learn. Sure, they made some mistakes but they also contributed to their team's win against yet another top four challenger. Melbourne also had the ascendancy in the ruck for most of the game but that wasn't due to Jeff White's performance alone this time. Paul Johnson continues to grow in stature as a ruckman and is dispelling the view held back in his West Coast days that he is not strong overhead. Not only can he take a mark but he moves well around the ground and his ruckwork is getting better all the time. He was a bit iffy with his kicking for goal but I don't think this is a problem area for him normally. We are also beginning to see the emergence of a couple of first round draft choices on the forward line in Colin Sylvia who was a good contributor and Matthew Bate whose strong hands and long left foot kicking were a feature. Brad Green was below the standards he set last week but still chipped in with some great marks in defence late in the game and Cam Bruce has the stutters with his kicking. Once a very reliable kick for goal, he's been well off direction and now has problems kicking over a jam tin. His contribution was still sold but he can do a hell of a lot better. Travis Johnstone's influence was limited by a hamstring twinge which had him back in the rooms putting on a track suit long before the game was won. Enter a couple of hard nosed youngsters in Brock McLean and Nathan Jones assisted by veteran James McDonald to take over the centre and work the Magpie midfield over nicely. McLean's determination and his single minded mental strength was no better summed up by his anger and self-criticism that led to his being penalised for time wasting when he just failed in his pursuit of the football near the boundary late in the game. Yes, it was noticed by the umpire, it did cost a goal in the end and it was stupid of him to let off steam in that way and at that point in time. However, it demonstrated just where this kid is headed because very few who play the game have that intensity and desire for the ball combined with those skills. He is only going to get much, much better. But the hero of the day was Robbo. He marked strongly and added bite and enthusiasm as well as inspiration alongside his wounded skipper. He was devastating when the team was devastating early in the game, he was steady when steady was required and he was brilliant in the end, finishing the game off with a flourish as he threaded the ball through with his after the siren kick for goal number seven. And, as he lifted his arms in triumph to celebrate the victory, I could almost imagine that I heard the Hand of God clapping along with the crowd. Melbourne 6.6.42 8.9.57 9.14.68 13.16.94 Collingwood 2.3.15 6.5.41 9.11.65 11.15.81 Goals Melbourne Robertson 7 Bate 2 Davey Godfrey Johnstone McDonald Collingwood Cloke Johnson 3 Davis 2 Fraser Lockyer Medhurst Best Melbourne Robertson McLean Bate McDonald Wheatley Jones Holland Collingwood: Johnson H Shaw Holland Burns Cloke Lockyer Changes Melbourne Yze (groin) replaced in the selected side by Holland Collingwood R Shaw (hamstring) replaced in the selected side by Stanley Injuries Melbourne Johnstone (hamstring) Neitz (knee) Collingwood O'Brien (ankle/shoulder) Umpires Grun Jeffery McLaren Crowd 70,660 at MCG

by Whispering Jack More than twenty years have elapsed since Argentinian Diego Maradona scored his "Hand of God" goal in a FIFA World Cup quarter final against England in Mexico. The goal happened because of a simple error from the referee who missed seeing the outside of the Argentinian's left fist as it made contact with the ball that subsequently careered into the net for a goal. Five minutes later, Maradona scored another one - later voted the greatest goal in World Cup history - when he eluded five English outfield players (Hoddle, Reid, Sansom, Butcher and Fenwick) as well as goalkeeper Shilton. Although England scored through Gary Lineker in the 81st minute, Argentina won the match 2-1, went on to take the 1986 World Cup and ever since, the English have been moaning and groaning about that infamous goal. I have a feeling that, in the decades to come, Collingwood supporters will also be complaining about Russell Robertson's hands on the back of Magpie defender Alan Toovey and how he was able to escape detection at a vital point in the last quarter of the Melbourne v Collingwood game on Queens Birthday 2007. Robbo kicked the goal after being awarded the controversial mark and the Demons regained their control over the game. When asked on 3AW after the game if he "got away with one", he replied: "Yeah, I think I did." "Them's the breaks," as they say in the classics. The umpire didn't see Robbo's Hand of God so the decision to pay him the mark was a correct one. The umpires can't be relied upon to make guesses and these things ebb and flow from game to game and during any particular game. Anyway, the record shows that Collingwood had a good run from the umpires on the day kicking three of their 11 goals from frees while Melbourne received none. Like Diego Maradonna all those years before him, Robbo was the match-winner on this day for more reasons than the Hand of God; there was plenty of brilliance from the high flyer who saw off at least three opponents and could easily have kicked ten for the day bar for some goalkicking yippery in the third quarter when he scored three points in a row. Melbourne's 13 point victory has been threatening for a while now. Leaving aside its disasterous trip to Perth, the form line has been encouraging as the team struggled to salvage something out of a season partly derailed by a spate of injuries to key players and partly through a new game style they struggled to get right. Robbo himself missed several games as a result of a knee injury incurred in Round 2, as did David Neitz. The inspirational Brock McLean was also missing for most of the first half of the season, his value to the team only becoming apparent by his exploits on the field once he returned a few weeks ago. Others like Jared Rivers, Matthew Whelan and Brent Moloney are still out of the side but things have been coming together nicely and, for at least one quarter of each of their last three games, the team has clicked. Heaven help an opponent, if they can do it for four quarters! While Robbo was THE hero, there were many unsung heroes on the day. The Demons' makeshift defence, filled with players who are either very young or alternatively, unfashionable as footballers performed magnificently. At the start of the season, we thought we might see very little of Ben Holland, Clint Bizzell and Daniel Ward - they're certainly not in the silky smooth department and yet they gave their all and a lot more on Monday. Blue collar Nathan Carroll belied his connection with the silver tailed Demons against the working class Magpies and Simon Godfrey added yet another scalp to his belt (and his finessing for a goal early in the game was sensational). Daniel Bell turned the tables on Alan Didak (who might have gone home wishing the Tribunal hadn't let him off the hook last week) and he is fast gaining recognition as one of the competition's rising defenders. Then there were youngsters in Ricky Petterd and James Frawley, both in their debut seasons and with plenty to learn. Sure, they made some mistakes but they also contributed to their team's win against yet another top four challenger. Melbourne also had the ascendancy in the ruck for most of the game but that wasn't due to Jeff White's performance alone this time. Paul Johnson continues to grow in stature as a ruckman and is dispelling the view held back in his West Coast days that he is not strong overhead. Not only can he take a mark but he moves well around the ground and his ruckwork is getting better all the time. He was a bit iffy with his kicking for goal but I don't think this is a problem area for him normally. We are also beginning to see the emergence of a couple of first round draft choices on the forward line in Colin Sylvia who was a good contributor and Matthew Bate whose strong hands and long left foot kicking were a feature. Brad Green was below the standards he set last week but still chipped in with some great marks in defence late in the game and Cam Bruce has the stutters with his kicking. Once a very reliable kick for goal, he's been well off direction and now has problems kicking over a jam tin. His contribution was still sold but he can do a hell of a lot better. Travis Johnstone's influence was limited by a hamstring twinge which had him back in the rooms putting on a track suit long before the game was won. Enter a couple of hard nosed youngsters in Brock McLean and Nathan Jones assisted by veteran James McDonald to take over the centre and work the Magpie midfield over nicely. McLean's determination and his single minded mental strength was no better summed up by his anger and self-criticism that led to his being penalised for time wasting when he just failed in his pursuit of the football near the boundary late in the game. Yes, it was noticed by the umpire, it did cost a goal in the end and it was stupid of him to let off steam in that way and at that point in time. However, it demonstrated just where this kid is headed because very few who play the game have that intensity and desire for the ball combined with those skills. He is only going to get much, much better. But the hero of the day was Robbo. He marked strongly and added bite and enthusiasm as well as inspiration alongside his wounded skipper. He was devastating when the team was devastating early in the game, he was steady when steady was required and he was brilliant in the end, finishing the game off with a flourish as he threaded the ball through with his after the siren kick for goal number seven. And, as he lifted his arms in triumph to celebrate the victory, I could almost imagine that I heard the Hand of God clapping along with the crowd. Melbourne 6.6.42 8.9.57 9.14.68 13.16.94 Collingwood 2.3.15 6.5.41 9.11.65 11.15.81 Goals Melbourne Robertson 7 Bate 2 Davey Godfrey Johnstone McDonald Collingwood Cloke Johnson 3 Davis 2 Fraser Lockyer Medhurst Best Melbourne Robertson McLean Bate McDonald Wheatley Jones Holland Collingwood: Johnson H Shaw Holland Burns Cloke Lockyer Changes Melbourne Yze (groin) replaced in the selected side by Holland Collingwood R Shaw (hamstring) replaced in the selected side by Stanley Injuries Melbourne Johnstone (hamstring) Neitz (knee) Collingwood O'Brien (ankle/shoulder) Umpires Grun Jeffery McLaren Crowd 70,660 at MCG

WAYWARD ZEBRAS WIN WELL by Barry from Beach Road A huge crowd was on hand at City Oval Coburg on Queens Birthday Monday to witness an inaccurate Sandringham return to the winner's list and regain top place on the VFL ladder with a solid but unspectacular 29 point victory over the Coburg Tigers. A large number of those in attendance were Tiger fans there to watch the comeback of their injured star Nathan Brown and it was therefore somewhat ironic that the Zebra defence contained Melbourne's own Nathan Brown as well as Matthew Whelan, the player who accidentally collided with Brown when he broke his leg at the Telstra Dome in 2005. All three worked hard and played well in their endeavours to return to the big stage in a fortnight's time when their AFL teams will meet at the MCG. Conditions at the ground were quite good despite the overnight and early morning rain and it was the Zebras, smarting from last week's defeat at North Ballarat, who started off playing with urgency and real purpose. They were quickly off the mark jumping the home side with goals to David Gallagher and Lynden Dunn. The Sandy forward line was perhaps a bit top heavy and star forward Nick Sautner was being well blanketed by Tiger defender Jarrod Silvester. The task fell on the shoulders of discarded Demon Brad Miller to step into the breach and he did so with some strong marking for a couple of early goals. Coburg fought back late in the quarter restricting Sandy to a four point lead into the first break. Miller was one of a number of players welcomed into the side. Brown and Whelan were also in along with Chris Lamb returning from suspension and Ezra Poyas from injury. However, brilliant small man Shane Valenti missed for the second week in a row. The strength and experience of the reigning premiers started to tell early in the second quarter and with Lamb, Biddlecombe and Warnock combining well in defence, the Zebras were able to rebound the ball to advantage. Gallagher was superb all day with his chasing and tackling and he was damaging with his possession particularly when moving the ball forward. Peter Summers, while not his usual classy self was still handy and won lots of tough footy in the midfield. For the quarter the visitors kicked 4.7 to two straight goals to move to a 23 point half time lead. Honours were pretty much even in the third quarter as the home side refused to give in again a dominant Zebra forward line led by Miller whose excellent marking form continued. He finished the day with a six goal tally which could have been much more but for his inaccuracy in front of goal. He was too strong for Jay Schultz who had to be moved into attack (and ended with three goals). Miller received great assistance from Simon Buckley, Gallagher, Summers and Rod Crowe who moved the ball constantly in his direction. At the other end of the ground Biddlecombe and Warnock repelled countless attacks and they were given outstanding assistance from Jace Bode, Brown and Whelan. Sandringham steamrolled home in the final quarter but their wayward kicking for goal let Coburg off the hook time and again. Gallagher, who had been excellent all day, kicked a great goal from the boundary and Summers capped the afternoon off with a great mark and goal at the death to see the Zebras home by 15.17.107 to Coburg's more accurate 12.6.78. After the game, coach Mark Williams was full of praise for Miller's performance which was chock full of some big crunching pack marks. "He had something like eight contested marks, he was big and strong contesting," Williams said. While he was quite happy with the team total of twenty-two marks taken inside the attacking 50 metre arc, the coach was disappointed that the Tigers managed six of their own goals from free kicks and will be looking to a more disciplined approach in future games. The Zebras return to Trevor Barker Beach Road Oval for next week's match against the Box Hill Hawks who always provide a tough contest irrespective of the teams' respective positions on the ladder. A highlight of next week's activities will be the 1997 premiership players 10 year reunion in the Social Club. Enquiries through the club [Phone: 9598 8629, Fax: 9521 0017] HOW THE DEMONS FARED Jace Bode - had a tagging role on dangerous Coburg player Alistair Neville and kept him quiet all day. His best performance yet with the Zebras. Nathan Brown - an excellent game from Brown who did a lot of hard work and linked up well. Simon Buckley - prominent all day and gave a lot of drive from his wing. Lynden Dunn - kicked an early goal and always looked dangerous but drifted in and out of the game. Colin Garland - played off the bench, kicked a goal but had little impact. Chris Johnson - was in everything early and was a solid contributor on the day. Brad Miller - with Sautner well covered Miller took the mantle of the leading forward and comprehensively beat a handy opponent in Jay Schultz in the air and on the ground. Shultz was moved off him in the last quarter and kicked a three goals for the Tigers. Michael Newton - prominent early with a goal in each of the opening quarters. Provided some excitement with a spectacular mark and a banana kick goal but was in the wars a bit with what appeared to be a finger injury and then a blow to the head from a Coburg player. Shane Neaves - won the ruck duels and was handy around the ground. Byron Pickett - did what he had to do and played his usual no nonsense game. He made a few of characteristic dashes but is still a few weeks away from an acceptable level of fitness for AFL duties. Matthew Warnock - probably the stand out defender in this game with Biddlecombe, Warnock was impressive with his pace and run out of the backline. Matthew Whelan - a steady effort in his comeback from injury. Should improve on that next week. Sandringham 5.1.31 9.8.62 12.10.82 15.17.107 Coburg Tigers 4.3.27 6.3.39 9.5.59 12.6.78 Goals Sandringham Miller 6 Gallagher 3 Newton 2 Dunn Garland Poyas Summers Coburg Tigers Schulz 3 Brown Krakouer Riewoldt 2 F Caruso N Caruso Moore Best Sandringham Gallagher Miller Brown Warnock Dunn Buckley Coburg Tigers Horne Shelton Silvester Krakouer Hartigan Caruso RESERVES STRUGGLE The reserves were again forced to play one short after changes were forced to the senior side and struggled against a Coburg side that played a more direct and attacking style. Sam Monaghan, Rennie Gilchrist and Peter McGettigan all continued their fine seasons while Daniel Hayes again proved to be a likely type kicking a goal and was named in the best for the second week in succession. Sandringham 1.5.11 3.6.24 7.8.50 10.10.70 Coburg Tigers 3.2.20 8.3.51 13.9.81 16.15.111 Goals Sandringham Gileno Martyn Monaghan 2 Dunne Gilchrist Hayes McKenzie Coburg Tigers Mullins 4 Currie 4 Robertson 2 Liddle Gazzo Hill Krojs Carrick Dagher Best Sandringham Monaghan Gilchrist McGettigan Hayes Neville Turcarelli Coburg Tigers Dowd Vasilevski Mullins Robertson Hill Clingan

by Barry from Beach Road A huge crowd was on hand at City Oval Coburg on Queens Birthday Monday to witness an inaccurate Sandringham return to the winner's list and regain top place on the VFL ladder with a solid but unspectacular 29 point victory over the Coburg Tigers. A large number of those in attendance were Tiger fans there to watch the comeback of their injured star Nathan Brown and it was therefore somewhat ironic that the Zebra defence contained Melbourne's own Nathan Brown as well as Matthew Whelan, the player who accidentally collided with Brown when he broke his leg at the Telstra Dome in 2005. All three worked hard and played well in their endeavours to return to the big stage in a fortnight's time when their AFL teams will meet at the MCG. Conditions at the ground were quite good despite the overnight and early morning rain and it was the Zebras, smarting from last week's defeat at North Ballarat, who started off playing with urgency and real purpose. They were quickly off the mark jumping the home side with goals to David Gallagher and Lynden Dunn. The Sandy forward line was perhaps a bit top heavy and star forward Nick Sautner was being well blanketed by Tiger defender Jarrod Silvester. The task fell on the shoulders of discarded Demon Brad Miller to step into the breach and he did so with some strong marking for a couple of early goals. Coburg fought back late in the quarter restricting Sandy to a four point lead into the first break. Miller was one of a number of players welcomed into the side. Brown and Whelan were also in along with Chris Lamb returning from suspension and Ezra Poyas from injury. However, brilliant small man Shane Valenti missed for the second week in a row. The strength and experience of the reigning premiers started to tell early in the second quarter and with Lamb, Biddlecombe and Warnock combining well in defence, the Zebras were able to rebound the ball to advantage. Gallagher was superb all day with his chasing and tackling and he was damaging with his possession particularly when moving the ball forward. Peter Summers, while not his usual classy self was still handy and won lots of tough footy in the midfield. For the quarter the visitors kicked 4.7 to two straight goals to move to a 23 point half time lead. Honours were pretty much even in the third quarter as the home side refused to give in again a dominant Zebra forward line led by Miller whose excellent marking form continued. He finished the day with a six goal tally which could have been much more but for his inaccuracy in front of goal. He was too strong for Jay Schultz who had to be moved into attack (and ended with three goals). Miller received great assistance from Simon Buckley, Gallagher, Summers and Rod Crowe who moved the ball constantly in his direction. At the other end of the ground Biddlecombe and Warnock repelled countless attacks and they were given outstanding assistance from Jace Bode, Brown and Whelan. Sandringham steamrolled home in the final quarter but their wayward kicking for goal let Coburg off the hook time and again. Gallagher, who had been excellent all day, kicked a great goal from the boundary and Summers capped the afternoon off with a great mark and goal at the death to see the Zebras home by 15.17.107 to Coburg's more accurate 12.6.78. After the game, coach Mark Williams was full of praise for Miller's performance which was chock full of some big crunching pack marks. "He had something like eight contested marks, he was big and strong contesting," Williams said. While he was quite happy with the team total of twenty-two marks taken inside the attacking 50 metre arc, the coach was disappointed that the Tigers managed six of their own goals from free kicks and will be looking to a more disciplined approach in future games. The Zebras return to Trevor Barker Beach Road Oval for next week's match against the Box Hill Hawks who always provide a tough contest irrespective of the teams' respective positions on the ladder. A highlight of next week's activities will be the 1997 premiership players 10 year reunion in the Social Club. Enquiries through the club [Phone: 9598 8629, Fax: 9521 0017] HOW THE DEMONS FARED Jace Bode - had a tagging role on dangerous Coburg player Alistair Neville and kept him quiet all day. His best performance yet with the Zebras. Nathan Brown - an excellent game from Brown who did a lot of hard work and linked up well. Simon Buckley - prominent all day and gave a lot of drive from his wing. Lynden Dunn - kicked an early goal and always looked dangerous but drifted in and out of the game. Colin Garland - played off the bench, kicked a goal but had little impact. Chris Johnson - was in everything early and was a solid contributor on the day. Brad Miller - with Sautner well covered Miller took the mantle of the leading forward and comprehensively beat a handy opponent in Jay Schultz in the air and on the ground. Shultz was moved off him in the last quarter and kicked a three goals for the Tigers. Michael Newton - prominent early with a goal in each of the opening quarters. Provided some excitement with a spectacular mark and a banana kick goal but was in the wars a bit with what appeared to be a finger injury and then a blow to the head from a Coburg player. Shane Neaves - won the ruck duels and was handy around the ground. Byron Pickett - did what he had to do and played his usual no nonsense game. He made a few of characteristic dashes but is still a few weeks away from an acceptable level of fitness for AFL duties. Matthew Warnock - probably the stand out defender in this game with Biddlecombe, Warnock was impressive with his pace and run out of the backline. Matthew Whelan - a steady effort in his comeback from injury. Should improve on that next week. Sandringham 5.1.31 9.8.62 12.10.82 15.17.107 Coburg Tigers 4.3.27 6.3.39 9.5.59 12.6.78 Goals Sandringham Miller 6 Gallagher 3 Newton 2 Dunn Garland Poyas Summers Coburg Tigers Schulz 3 Brown Krakouer Riewoldt 2 F Caruso N Caruso Moore Best Sandringham Gallagher Miller Brown Warnock Dunn Buckley Coburg Tigers Horne Shelton Silvester Krakouer Hartigan Caruso RESERVES STRUGGLE The reserves were again forced to play one short after changes were forced to the senior side and struggled against a Coburg side that played a more direct and attacking style. Sam Monaghan, Rennie Gilchrist and Peter McGettigan all continued their fine seasons while Daniel Hayes again proved to be a likely type kicking a goal and was named in the best for the second week in succession. Sandringham 1.5.11 3.6.24 7.8.50 10.10.70 Coburg Tigers 3.2.20 8.3.51 13.9.81 16.15.111 Goals Sandringham Gileno Martyn Monaghan 2 Dunne Gilchrist Hayes McKenzie Coburg Tigers Mullins 4 Currie 4 Robertson 2 Liddle Gazzo Hill Krojs Carrick Dagher Best Sandringham Monaghan Gilchrist McGettigan Hayes Neville Turcarelli Coburg Tigers Dowd Vasilevski Mullins Robertson Hill Clingan

56. Cameron Bruce 55. Nathan Jones 52. Aaron Davey 49. Daniel Bell 43. Brad Green 39. James McDonald 35. Brent Moloney Colin Sylvia 34. Travis Johnstone 32. Matthew Bate 31. Jeff White 29. Russell Robertson 26. Simon Godfrey 24. Adem Yze 21. David Neitz 20. Brad Miller 18. Ben Holland Ricky Petterd Jared Rivers 15. Nathan Brown 13. Clint Bizzell 9. Nathan Carroll Brock McLean 6. Paul Wheatley 3. Daniel Ward 2. Paul Johnson 1. Lynden Dunn

MELBOURNE: 6.6, 8.9, 9.14, 13.16 (94) COLLINGWOOD: 2.3, 6.5, 9.11, 11.15 (81) GOALS: Melbourne: Robertson 7, Bate 2, Johnstone, McDonald, Godfrey, Davey Collingwood: Cloke 3, Johnson 3, Davis 2, Medhurst, Lockyer, Fraser BEST: Melbourne: Robertson, Holland, McDonald, McLean, Bate, Bell, Jones, Bizzell Collingwood: H. Shaw, Johnson, Holland, Cloke, Burns, Lockyer, Pendlebury, Swan INJURIES: Melbourne: Johnstone (hamstring) Collingwood: O'Brien (dislocated shoulder) REPORTS: Nil CHANGES: Melbourne: Yze (groin) replaced in selected side by Holland. Collingwood: R Shaw (groin) replaced in selected side by Stanley UMPIRES: McLaren, Grun, Jeffery CROWD: 70,660 at MCG

Veteran Demon supporter Clyde the Cabbie has hit the front ... 1. (2) 54 Clyde_Cabbie 2. (1) 53 Whispering_Jack 3. (2) 52 canberrademon(herb) 3. (2) 52 great_gatsby 5. (6) 51 deanox 5. (12) 51 deesthisyear 7. (12) 50 BigKev Demon 7. (12) 50 bl3281 7. (6) 50 demon_davey 7. (2) 50 Demonland 7. (12) 50 Go_Ds 7. (8) 50 Scoop Junior 7. (22) 50 snarler_0 14. (12) 49 Alpha_33 14. (8) 49 frangas 14. (8) 49 paliosiana 14. (19) 49 slamevil 14. (8) 49 TimDees 19. (12) 48 DeMoNiC 19. (19) 48 KrazyJay 19. (19) 48 Pinball_Wizard 22. (27) 47 Goodvibes 22. (12) 47 petejh2000 22. (23) 47 Rivers Run Red 25. (23) 46 achirnside 25. (23) 46 Jackieboy_0 27. (28) 45 rusty_corner 28. (23) 43 dee'viator 29. (29) 39 Kieranbj 30. (30) 38 demon_fanatic 31. (31) 37 Dees_Fan16 32. (32) 35 Fingers Power 32. (34) 35 No Cigar 34. (33) 34 Dappadan 35. (35) 28 melon22 36. (36) 27 jaded24 37. (37) 26 CarnTheDees 38. (38) 19 rusty_kingswood

Thanks people. We have our official votes. I'll post the full standings at the halfway mark of the season later this evening.

Internet draft wizz kid Colin Wisbey has finally put together his predictions for the 2006 AFL National Draft selections. Here they are in full: PREFACE Because I pulled the plug early on posting my profiles at draft time, I've been re-writing my predictions list to include more comprehensive detail for most players than I normally would. This is taking a lot longer than I had anticipated, having to fit it in with more important work priorities. My predictions are based entirely on pre-draft. No consideration has been given to anything that has occurred since then. PREDICTIONS FOR "UNDER 18" 2006 AFL DRAFTEES I judge them to have "made AFL" when they have played a decent number of good AFL games over a sustained period (i.e. not merely getting games when their club's list is decimated by injuries, or due to just their size or pace presenting them with premature opportunities). The categories generally reflect players about whom I feel most confident in making predictions. This was a terrific draft, somewhat like 2001 but with greater depth. I believe there are many serious bargains in that I feel some clubs paid a very high price for certain players and that some others who I consider "sure fire" AFL were allowed to slip because they weren't a sexy height etc. In my honest opinion Essendon did very well in this "bargains" area. The following format is "Player (actual draft pick and club) [my pre-draft ranking]". Note: My ranking number does not necessarily reflect the draft pick I would use or would be necessary. (eg You don't pay a higher draft pick price than you think will be needed to get the player). In designating a ranking number, I try to come up a number that reflects both the relative upside and risk/concerns. Every Recruiting Manager (and staff) wrestles with the same exercise. eg You might think a player has great upside but that there is a significant doubt/concern about his likelihood of achieving it (perhaps through concerns about his current commitment or ability to overcome a current chronic injury etc). You might think another player has less upside but you are far more confident of him achieving it. Which player do you rank higher / get keener on? Furthermore, as of this draft I'm against ranking any specialist ruck in top 15 anyway. (Rucks tend to be more injury prone, take longer to return on investment, are more likely to have queries re bulking up, and there is historically a disproportionate success rate of late ruck picks over early ones). CATEGORY ONE - WILL BE TOP SHELF (roughly in the order of their upside but allowing for my level of confidence in them achieving it): GIBBS, Bryce (1 Carlton) [1] Standout. The footballer's footballer. Class midfielder. Very bottom-age but plug 'n play. Rises to the occasion. Quality kid with a professional approach to his footy already. Only flaws are "somewhat" one-sidedness (although he is one of those smart footballers who, through ability to think his way out of trouble, manages to avoid getting exposed) and lack of zip. Neither will cause him great concern at AFL level because he is smart enough to know where to run and how to cut the angles, and he has a great work-rate both ways (although needs to pay his own opponent more respect). He is neither as slow as his reputation would suggest nor quite as quick as his DC times suggest. The type who will surprise you by finishing up with 30 disposals when you might have guessed about 18. Not the type to carry the ball 50m or break the play open in the manner of a Judd but he just keeps on getting his own ball, keeps being in the right place at the right time, and routinely makes the smart decisions and has all the right hurt factors. There has been no more fail-safe AFL gun prospect since Griffen who I rate the most fail-safe since Hodge/Judd/Ball. In '06 SANFL Seniors, was named in the best in an incredible 10 of his 16 games (although surprisingly receiving Margery Medal votes in just 2), despite only turning 17 in March '06. Classy players are sometimes not noted for their tackling. Gibbs however regularly has a high tackle count and he is a very effective tackler. HAWKINS, Tom (41 Geelong) [2] Will be a gun FF/CHF. Already a man mountain but huge scope once chiselled down and conditioned. Style-wise, think of an early Lockett but who is team-orientated and works very hard both ways. Will take plenty of marks and kick plenty of goals but his career will also be noted for what he does to create opportunities for team-mates. Good hurt factors. Right footer (thumping kick) who rarely uses his left although he is actually quite good on it. Is often described as slow. He is no gazelle but his pace is underrated and I have no concerns whatsoever re his pace for AFL. He does nothing half-paced - he goes full bore and gets the most out of whatever his legs can produce. Terrific ethic and intensity, and not just for a huge man. Routinely chases and chases full bore. eg In game 2 of U18 Champs, chased a WA player for 70m, passing a team mate who couldn't be bothered - opponent had 15m start but Hawkins chased desperately and actually almost caught the opponent (who admittedly was running 3/4 pace). Mouth-watering prospect. JETTA, Leroy (18 Essendon) [5] Great talent if chooses to apply himself. X-factor. Better know by some as a quick, creative, flashy forward but, once he gets his tank right, I believe he will be a gun mid-fielder. Clever, courageous game-breaker. Fairly good decision-making and disposal (although sometimes bites off more than he can chew). Unaccountable, perhaps selfish, and off-field ethic (including time management, commitment) needs improvement. Jetta has been mad keen for AFL centre stage but has yet to embrace the same level of enthusiasm for the hard work and off-field self discipline required for AFL success. His natural game is based more on flamboyance than work ethic but, if he is prepared to get himself in top condition, there is no reason why he can't be very consistent. Immature personality but I've always felt he needed the AFL stage to bring out the best in him. Potential to be the next Kerr (and not just in style). Bargain pick, despite current immaturity. PROUD, Albert (22 Brisbane) [4] Tough, pacy, aggressive, consistent. Ethic, intensity, smarts, physical presence. Chases hard (excellent closing speed), hits hard. Because of his late start to '06 (foot operation) and O.P., he was in poor condition at DC (albeit probably too poor) so I'm not reading anything into his DC athletic results, especially poor endurance times. In my pre-draft profile I suggested "those results might encourage enough clubs to overlook him early draft and see him slipping in the order a bit, providing a bargain to the club who takes him". Would be plug 'n play if free of injury (esp O.P.) and fit. Showed better temper control in '06. Will lift his team when all around him are falling. Style-wise, picture an early Ricciuto. Is somewhat one-sided but his disposal, although not faultless, is fairly reliable. Genuine footballer and has the pace that many of the touted mids this year lack. HOULI, Bachar (42 Essendon) [8] Injury-prone (only major AFL query is durability) but smart, classy midfielder/HFF. Very good OHF and NHF (negative hurt factor). Not outside per se but, so far, has played the game on his own terms at his own pace, Predator style "off the pack" a la Shakleton,, and is on good terms with himself. Very footy-smart and potentially more athletic than his appearance/style have suggested. I've always suspected he treated underage footy with almost contempt. Will leave no stone unturned and I believe he will not only shine at AFL level but show us a more rounded game (re on-field work rate). Historical concerns re his endurance and pace but I am convinced that, when injury-free, he will have excellent endurance and quite good pace. Absolute bargain. DJERRKURA, Nathan (25 Geelong) [9] 176cm electrifying, fierce, dynamic, quick, clean, take-them-on, relentless ball-carrying dasher. Byron Picket with some Wirrpanda. Breaks the play open. Exciting combination of speed, motor, attack, physicality and natural footballer ability. Despite his height, I think he is likely to be something special. X-factor. Trademarks are (1) Come from nowhere to run opponent down with excellent closing speed and fierce tackle ("silent assassin" ), (2) Take-them-on dash then kick into forward 50 (if not nailed in the process!). Other main selling points are intensity, balance, contested ball ability, agility, endurance, overhead, consistency, evasion, traffic management, versatility. Gives away an avg 3 frees per game, virtually all through either (over-)ambitiously taking opponents on and getting nailed, or through over-zealous tackles. He's a smart kid and I'm confident he will learn to be more judicious. Regardless, even though 3 FAs a game is not what a coach would normally like to see, I think it is more than balanced by the pressure he puts opponents under (a la Davey, but with brutality) and the number of times he is actually successful in breaking the play open with his daring. i.e. If you want the benefits of his attack on the man and opening up of the play, you should expect to have to wear occasional slip-ups. Benefit greatly outweighs cost in Djerrkura's case. (I'd rather a kid who dares to dare than one who plays introverted). He is as quick as any '06 draftee. He is as good and as reliable in the air as most of the other good smalls/mediums who are good overhead. Usually a good kick and his disposals often hurt. Has the dash, daring and hurt factor you want from an outside player, the hardness and in-close ability you want from an inside player, plays tall, is versatile, is footballer and athlete in equal doses, is a great kid who will be very coachable, and doesn't have a "go home" query. Add endurance, physicality and ethic (both ways) to that and IMHO no other kid in this draft can lay better claim to that package of traits. I'm less hung up on height than many people are. Recent premiership teams, Brownlow high voters and AA teams prove there is always a place for a smaller player if he is special enough in certain areas or as a package. I rated Djerrkura quite a lot earlier than I knew he would go but am very confident he will be very good AFL. Except for (arguably) height, he is made for today's game and could play anywhere down the flanks. Probably best suited to HBF or wing in his early AFL days. Could play BP too but I believe his talents are best utilised where he can afford more risks. In the backline, will be able to supply both Pickett-like pressure as well as plenty of run out of defence and hardball get ability. Down the track I think he could be a good AFL onballer. Has the capacity to potentially be a run-with or even an inside mid. No doubts about his tank or speed or hardness and he is quite clean under pressure (both getting and disposing). And he should be virtually plug 'n play. Bargain. SELWOOD, Joel (7 Geelong) [11] First Dibs midfielder. Elite play-reader with great ability to win the ball and to pressure opponents from winning it cleanly. Very balanced genuine footballer. Excellent vision, smarts, very good by hand, strong overhead. Gets to a helluva lot of contests and very competitive in any type of contest, ground level or overhead, regardless of pressure, and against different types of opponents. If I had to describe him in "one" word it would probably be either "relentless" or "highly-competitive". Has most of the typical Selwood traits (courage, ethic, endurance, competitiveness, overhead, lack of pace) but has much better decision-making than the twins. His kicking is also better, albeit not one of his strengths. SELLAR, James (14 Adelaide) [3] 195cm skilled, well-built footballer with athleticism, smarts, hands, disposal. Flaky '06, intensity query but you don't physically lose what he had displayed prior. Very bottom-age. I'm prepared to virtually ignore '06 as he apparently had to endure various on and off-field difficulties. In the '04 and '05 U16 Champs, I considered him even more impressive than Gibbs. Started 2006 as #1 in my rankings (Gibbs #2). In the end, Gibbs' performances were just so compelling, and without the queries that Sellar's '06 form raised, that I had to slip Sellar behind but I dropped off him only marginally. Even in his "disappointing" '06, he kicked 4g in 1st half of his 1st SANFL Seniors game (as CHF!), beat the highly rated Gumbleton as CHB, and averaged 17 disposals in the U18 Champs. (How many 195cm types, let alone any who had just lost 8kg through illness, do that in any U18 Champs?). By comparison, we were all quite satisfied with the Champs form of Gumbleton, Hansen and Leunberger, and they averaged 15, 13, and 11 disposals respectively and Sellar's disposal was the best of the lot. He even had 15d in just the 2nd 1/2 of one Champs game (albeit as virtually a loose wingman). Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. He did NOT have a disappointing year for a bottom-age 195cm kid, even a highly rated one. He just had a disappointing year for Sellar, based on our expectations of him specifically. Why did we have such high expectations? Because of the talent he had shown over a 2 year period prior to that. I suspect he has a personal issue to conquer but I would have taken him on the assumption that he can, such is his upside. Should be very versatile but especially has the makings of an outstanding CHB (although his preference is CHF). An exciting, and rare, combination of not only leap, 195cm, marking strength, defensive and negating skills, cool head and smarts but, importantly, the pace and confidence to give regular run and linking out of defence and roost the ball long to a target. I foresee him regularly turning defence into goal-scoring opportunities. I also think he is more suited to the straight ahead aspects of CHB than the "stop/start" of CHF. Excellent ruck skills and could well be a good AFL ruckman/follower a la Goodes (without the freakishness), despite being only 195cm, as he has such a big leap and athleticism and he seems to enjoy ruck contests. Has virtually all the attributes of a modern CHF also and I do rate him highly in that role. Makes the right decisions. Good evasion. Good vision and disposal (including depth), even on the run. Good hurt factors. Trademarks are (1) Fluency - in everything. (Always looks to be doing every action "on the bit", effortlessly). (2) One-grab mark, positioning and timing well, then either a quick, accurate feed or immediately run off his opponent and do a fluent, long, probably accurate kick. (3) Run to link, moving with arms stiff and hanging down, seemingly moving in slow motion until you notice the opponent struggling to keep up. THORP, Mitchell (6 Hawthorn) [6] Versatile tall. Main selling points are contested marking, fantastic endurance / ground coverage, clean hands, vision, spoiling. Accountable, footy smart in many respects. Good courage and wins more than his share of hardball/contested gets. '06 form overall was good but not quite as impressive as I'd hoped but he didn't really do a pre-season (due to O.P., which he is now on top of). Huge leap, very strong overhead (although I would like to see him try to protect the ball a bit more often when possible, a la Carey, instead of taking the ball directly above or a bit behind his head). Young for his age but potential Chris Grant if he stops getting ahead of himself. I rate Thorp behind only Hawkins and Sellar as the best KPP "potential package" in this draft. Capable of making CHF a "permanent" role at AFL but might be best suited to CHB. Main query as a defender would be whether a quick leading forward might show him up for pace over the first few metres. His pace is a little hard to judge as he has had O.P. and also, although he covers a lot of ground, he is not noted for hard chasing or ball-carrying and he sometimes, at least at U18 level, seems casual. I'm comfortable with his pace over a distance - for his size. There have been times when he has looked a little tardy and the main concern would be the 1st few metres. Some surprising pace when he wants to pull it out. eg in a 40m run to the loose ball, Thorp gave Petterd a few metres start but got there first and both seemed flat out. In a VFL game, Thorp kept up with Baird (his opponent) in a 25m run to the ball. Baird recorded a 3.00sec 20m and a 0.96sec 5m time a few years ago. On the other hand, Thorp was left in the wake of another VFL player on a number of occasions in one game when playing FB(?) whenever that player was on a lead. I query there though, how much was due to lack of pace on Thorp's part and how much was due to poor anticipation of, and reaction to, the opponent's take-off on the lead. Kicking is currently mixed bag but has the potential to be very good and I'm confident will be. Sometimes he seems a bit too casual under no pressure. Genuinely dual-sided. Nice economical, fluent kicking style, good depth. I noticed at 1/4, 3/4 time huddles that he seemed intelligent and very switched on. When deciding to carry the ball, he has a fairly regular tendency (more often at U18 level than VFL) to ignore the nearby presence of an opponent and approach his kick preparation as if he was in complete space (through arrogance? lack of awareness?) and becomes vulnerable to being bumped from the side as he kicks, to the detriment of his kicking effectiveness. He has some evasive ability and I'd like to see him work harder in those situations to create space before kicking. At the very least, he often takes a bit too long to dispose and his lateral awareness in such situations is not great. Thorp is very committed and I would have drafted him myself and prepared to part with a pick as early as #3 (Hawkins not being available) if I strongly wanted a KP and felt such an early pick was necessary. However, if height didn't need to factor into drafting considerations, I would prefer to take either Jetta or Proud (not that anything like pick #3 was ever going to be needed for them). CATEGORY TWO - WILL BE AT LEAST GOOD (I didn't bother too much about the order but its very (!) roughly in the order of their upside, with some allowance for my level of confidence in them achieving it): (Some are extremely late picks but I call it as I see it). HANSEN, Lachlan (3 Kangaroos) [7] Likely AFL long-termer (probably CHB) and would have been my #4 if not for disappointing OHF (offensive hurt factor) due to iffy kicking and tunnel vision on the run. (Needs to more frequently look for options to feed off to, tends to too often just get and kick long and direct without displaying good vision or looking for best option). Even when not on the run, is too inclined to kick off virtually one step. Very strong overhead (hands, judgement, balance). Excellent endurance / coverage, ethic, courage. Pace when injury-free is at least "OK", although a bit slower than his DC times suggest. Backs his endurance and loves to run his opponent up and around the ground. Missed a couple of weeks with a hip complaint prior to '06 U18 Champs (cleaned up post-draft) and I felt he never looked completely free in his movement for the rest of the season, despite generally good form. HISLOP, Tom (20 Essendon) [10] Aggressive powerhouse. Plug n play. Versatile bullish onballer/flanker who can play small or above his height, has fairly good pace, takes no prisoners, always gives a contest and gets a lot of contested ball but currently doesn't look for, take or hit the right option often enough - too often kicks long instead of looking for short options (hand or foot). Other main concern AFL-wise might be over-aggression. Main selling points are physicality, competitiveness, courage, intensity, overhead, endurance, balance, strength, consistency. Trademarks are (1) Hardball get, then hurried disposal, (2) Crunch a pack or an opponent, perhaps taking a very strong mark that he has no right to take. Often clean, especially at ground level in "static" situations (although not "routinely: clean overall). If not for the somewhat high number of blind and other inaccurate kicks, I would rank him about #5. I love his competitiveness and aggression at both man and ball but he must start getting better return from his possession tally. Kicking was better in VFL than at U18. He is not a bad kick per se. Good depth and dual-sided. The issue is reliability. Kicking style needs work. He tilts to the left, which limits your error margin over a short distance, and his arm movements need work. IMHO it is important for both arms to work virtually in sync, helping your body stay balanced, both laterally and vertically. Hislop's arms are way out of synch and affect his centre-of-mass transfer and his ability to kick directly through the ball. Left arm often spends time bent at 90 degrees upwards then comes forward and across his body, while his right arm stays back, hangs down and does nothing. By the end of his kick he is often off-balance. Those faults should be fairly "easily" fixed and will make a big difference to his kicking reliability. Hislop and Armitage are similar types, age, great endurance and both are virtually plug 'n play. Both courageous hardnuts with good work rate and both with sub-optimal disposal. Hislop has more pace, is a bit physically stronger, and is the better kick. Hislop arguably has greater impact too. I would definitely take Hislop over Armitage, much as I admire Armitage. Jetta is X-factor vs risk but is a very quick, electrifying magician and is capable of being a quality user (not that he is yet). Hislop is none of those but he will deliver for you every time, whereas Jetta will switch on when it suits him. Jetta's pace, daring, flair and disposal makes him potentially much more of an impact player. Hislop is more a player who stops the opposition having impact through his hardness at man and ball but he too can turn a game. Likes to take opponents on and carry the ball and is often, although not routinely, judicious. Astute in corralling an opponent but usually prefers the bone-crunching tackle or bump. I have been impressed re how very switched on and intelligent he is at the 1/4, 3/4 huddles. With ever-increasing sophistication of team game plans, being able to be on the same page as the coach is more important than ever. Exceptionally strong overhead for his size, especially the big screamer from behind but can mark from any angle/position and attacks his marks / hits the pack like there's no tomorrow. He is on the slower end of the "quick midfielder" scale rather than the quicker end of the "slightly slowish midfielder" scale. Probably best suited to HBF or onball but, despite being only 184cm, is versatile enough to play anywhere down the flanks. Could be exposed by a very quick or very tall opponent but, even then, is likely to be at least mainly competitive, such is his ability to play tall yet also have enough pace and smarts to know where to run, how to cut angles and how to pressure both aerially and at ground level. Has the motor and competitiveness to become an excellent run-with (in time) and that's the role in which I possibly favour him. ARMITAGE, David (9 St. Kilda) [19] Smart goer with heart, motor. Iffy pace. Definite AFL but MUST improve kicking. TIPPETT, Kurt (32 Adelaide) [12] Versatile, mobile newby ruck/KP. Works hard. No very major fault. 19yo but big upside. I'm generally sceptical about kids who are in their first year of footy. That's because such kids usually show only tiny snippets that excite you. I'm far less willing than many are to extrapolate from such little data, no matter how impressed I may have been with the kid's snippets. With Tippett, he has shown a lot, not just random cameos. I think he has terrific potential. What really impresses me is the amount of footy smarts he already has, albeit that he is still in the early stages of the learning curve. Although still raw, I doubt anyone who knew nothing about him would realise when they first saw him play that he was new to footy. 201cm types who are likely to be able to play any KP or ruck, have the pace of a quite quick midfielder, are physically virtually plug 'n play, can leap over tall buildings, can get their own ball, are at least competitive overhead, have a sharp brain and have the ethics/intensity of an inside mid don't grow on trees. Many of the things I like about Tippett would be good in any player but I could add "especially for 201cm" to a lot of my comments. I am rating him as a ruck who can play KP but I would be almost as confident rating him as a KPP who can ruck. I rate him "definite" AFL, despite being a newby. DICK, Brad (44 Collingwod) [24] Enigmatic but magical when en song. Risky ranking but huge upside EDWARDS, Shane (26 Richmond) [26] Skinny but nimble, slick, innovative, goes hard. Ranked on upside COLLARD, Clayton (31 Fremantle) [13] Highly skilled midfielder/ flanker. Painfully shy and naive about the workload required for AFL so will need quality mentoring but definitely has AFL ability. Query re ability to adapt so is some risk but he has big upside, class and some X-factor. Other main selling points are X-factor, smarts / vision, clean hands, evasion, balance, overhead. Trademarks are (1) Vacuum the ball off the carpet on the run, take on and perhaps make a fool of the oncoming opponent, then dob a nice goal or set a team mate up to do so, (2) Screamer. He might lose concentration before getting to the last page of the team's play book but, for every hair he might make you tear out, he'll give you a moment where you will feel smug that he is on your list. Has mainly played outside roles (HFF) but I am confident he will furnish into an inside mid option in time if/when he can get his endurance up enough. I compare him in style somewhat to Tyson Edwards but I also think he will be able (in time) to play all the roles that Tyson has played. Has always lived in the shadow, on and off-field, of his best mate, Jetta, It's often "Jetta, the star footballer, and his mate Collard". If both play AFL and get the most out of themselves, I believe Jetta will be the better player but with Collard probably not far behind. There seems a tendency in recruiting circles to talk as if Jetta is Collard's better performed younger brother. However Collard was the better performed in WAFL Seniors, was also named in '06 WA Seniors (!) state squad, and Jetta is actually 5 months older. On sheer ability, I rate Collard's AFL potential as "Definite" and only one aspect made me downgrade him to "Likely", viz "How well and quickly is he likely to settle in and feel like he belongs?". My only other significantly concern is the O.P. he has been battling. His DC weight was listed as 86kg but his fighting weight would currently be around 80kg. He "couldn't" (?) keep himself in good condition while suffering O.P. late season. Career-wise, Collard and Jetta getting split up into different states may be the best thing for both boys. Clayton can stop living in Leroy's shadow and that will be a watershed point in his development. I would definitely have been prepared to draft him with a pick around my ranking if necessary (not that it ever would have been). Assuming he settles in reasonably OK (!!), I am confident Collard will make as big a splash as most of this draft's first rounders, perhaps ready to debut in '07. HARBROW, Jarrod (R27 Western Bulldogs) [29] Clever slick improver. Risk but I'm more a fan than others are. GRIGG, Shaun (19 Carlton) [39] Consistent tall mid but burns ball way too often by foot. I have identified basic flaws in his kicking technique which should be fixable. If I somehow knew for certain that such flaws would be identified and fixed, he'd be one of the first be in this category, would have earned a very much earlier ranking from me, and I would have confidently labelled him "definite AFL 200 gamer". Kicking is probably his only major flaw as he is otherwise a very attractive package. His current kicking reliability is almost a show-stopper though. THOMAS, Lindsay (53 Kangaroos) [27] Top-age surprise early ranking but clever & works both ways. Needs endurance ADAMS, Leigh (R 3 Kangaroos) [35] Rover/FP/BP. Smart, inside. Honesty over class but no real flaw. LEUENBERGER, Matthew (4 Brisbane) [16] Promising ruck. Query balance but ... KRAKOUER, Nathan (39 Port Adelaide) [48] Lightning. Great user, smarts. If 75kg, serious AFL and would be in my top category. 61kg the only worry but a huge one. He will literally have to create history (re the modern era) as his BMI represents easily the skinniest build on record. His diet opportunities will be better now and that's the big hope. MOSS, Gary (56 Hawthorn) [17] Skinny & not lightning but every kg is footballer. Likely bargain due to build. URQUHART, Gavin (21 Kangaroos) [28] OP killed his '06 but definite AFL potential HBF. O.P. worries me and he makes this category on the explicit assumption that he overcomes his O.P.. REIMERS, Kyle (47 Essendon) [21] Take-them-on ball-carrying utility. Good overhead. Iffy decision-making but has real flair and presence and has been a rapid improver both on and off-field (and the latter in particular needed to improve). Still has to be a query re ability to meet the off-field demands of a professional AFL footballer so I can understand why he wasn't taken until pick 47 but I ranked him much earlier on the assumption that he will choose to sustain his recent improvement trend in this aspect. ANDERSON, Joseph (67 Carlton) [15] Rapidly improving 188cm, virtually bottom-age, hard-running utility. Still raw, not silky, but made for today's game. Great endurance, "handy" pace, huge leap, reads the play well, knows how to find the pill, routinely looks for best option, fairly often delivers accurately, is courageous and crashes packs. Proven himself against men. Main queries (all mentality-related) are: plays off the pack / too reactive / too Predator, defensive smarts, accountability. I've ranked him mainly on upside. He still has a heap of improvement in him. The sealers for me were (1) he will leave no stone unturned (2) his rapid improvement since mid '05 including radical changes to his on-field presence, impact, and physical attributes. Even if he can't fix the flaws I've identified, he still has enough going for him to be a fairly handy 60-100 gamer. In the '05 U18 and subsequent '05 U16 Champs I observed he was vanilla-size and build, introverted and played vanilla and introverted. I was staggered to hear that, just 8 months later, he won Darwin Seniors B&F (as 17yo) and was runner-up to Daryl White for B&F medal in the '06 NT Seniors GF. Come the '06 TAC trials, I couldn't believe the dramatic transformation. He was now a few centimetres taller, had filled out really well, had significantly lifted his pace, and played with a flair, confidence and physicality that were virtually non-existent a year earlier. Even his appearance and persona were markedly different. I was very impressed with what he did at the '06 U18 Champs, and quite impressed with much from his lead-up games. However I was still less than impressed with what he did NOT do. Much of the time, he played virtually loose man across half-back, presumably to coach's instructions, which makes assessing him a bit more difficult. He was still too reactive a bit too often and still a bit too often "played off the pack". In AFL he won't be able to wait to see how the play in his immediate area unfolds before deciding to involve himself, or letting an opponent have first crack, or not displaying appropriate defensive effort or defensive smarts. He is not a "natural footy brain for all situations" type like M Voss but he does sometimes displays a quickish brain. He strikes me as the 2yo colt who has all the energy in the world and looks a real prospect but needs more racing experience to knock some rough edges off and you're not quite sure what distance will suit him best in the long term but you reckon he moves better than most of the other colts in the paddock. His package has so many potential goodies in it that are at least at the 80% stage that, even if he doesn't later shine in a couple of the aspects I expect him to, he will still be value for his other attributes. I would have drafted him myself, although he was never going to need a pick as early as my ranking denoted. Suited to HBF where he can give some run and linking. "Wing" should suit too. Unlikely onballer (unless perhaps as run-with, in time). Will probably turn out to be a bargain. WELLINGHAM, Sharrod (R10 Collingwood) [37] Promising ball magnet. Slippery, smart. Quick but should carry ball more. Upside BEDFORD, Liam (R23 Geelong) [38] Skinny, outside, slippery, quick, clean. Needs to do more. Punt on upside vs wt SMITH, Chris (R13 Fremantle) [34] Honest, committed, versatile. No obvious fault, no special strength. Underrated. Additional comments: HAYES, Daniel (R12 MEL) [] Has the football ability to be in this group. A troubled outside flashy wing/HFF who, regardless of ability, needs 10 mentors. Way too risky for me to even consider including in my rankings, let alone have confidence in him adapting to AFL requirements.

Demonland paid its tribute to Peter with the Oracle dedicating his match preview the week he passed away - see OVER THE RAINBOW. Tributes were allso paid to him here.

This letter appears in today's print edition of the Herald Sun so for those who don't get the paper, here's my letter of the week written by Demon fan Sally Cordner to Mike Sheahan together with Sheahan's response:- Proud old Dees REGARDING your article at the weekend about the Melbourne Football Club and its lack of heart, lack of supporters and the question about "Where are the families of the '50s and the '60s"? Well, in effect myself and my family are one of those from the '50s and '60s and we are well and truly still here. We attend on a weekly basis, feel every loss, debrief after every game and are as loyal as we were when our grandfather, great uncle, fathers, uncles and cousin played. The Cordner boys - Denis (my father), Donald, Ted and John produced 15 children, with David playing for the Dees in the '80s. I can honestly say that 10 of these offspring regularly attend games and the others when they can. And by the way, very few of us ski. Sally Cordner, email MIKE SAYS: The day the Cordners abandon Melbourne is the day the footy club dies. Crowds this year suggest more Cordners needed. I NEVER crack snow jokes.

THE TURN OF A FRIENDLY CARD by Whispering Jack Brad Green's game against the Adelaide Crows last Saturday was just sensational. He made the most of his return to the midfield to surpass anything he had previously achieved in the red and blue colours. His contribution to the side's unexpected victory over an Adelaide team set to make an impact on the AFL finals again this season was exceptional. Almost as good as it gets. However, I was equally impressed with his statement after the game when he uttered those beautiful words: "we're still in the race for the eight." I personally loved this comment although admittedly I also found it hard to suppress a little giggle when I read his words embedded in Adam Cooper's article on melbournefc.com.au. "We're still in the race for the eight." Green's optimism and self-belief was enough to bring warmth and joy to my heart because it rekindled memories of bygone days; of a time some two or three decades ago when you reached a certain stage of a season and you knew your team was a long way out of contention but you held onto your dreams and religiously followed time worn adages about the "mathematical possibility" of making the finals. Most of the time that hope was illusory but you felt that by simply following another football cliché and you took things one week at a time there was an ever so slim chance that your team might somehow slip into the finals if luck fell its way. Like some desperado with a poor poker hand and few chips left in front of him (and therefore a very slight mathematical possibility of winning), you waited for the turn of a friendly card. The friendly card finally did turn Melbourne's way twenty years ago in 1987 when the Dees stormed home to win the last six home and away games on end. They fell into the final five and once there, went on to taste finals victory after a twenty-three year drought on no less than two occasions. The fairy tale only came to an end when tragedy struck in the form of a last minute infringement by a young Jimmy Stynes that resulted in the after siren Buckenara goal that cost the team victory in the preliminary final. The following year, they played off in a grand final. These days things are different. You need more than luck and mathematical possibility to achieve success in the highly competitive AFL and Melbourne is a long way further back than the 6-10 Demons of '87. Nobody in the history of the game has ever managed to come from anywhere near 0-9 to make the finals. Long ago and far away, nine games were half of a home and away season. This week's Round 11 clash marks the half way point. We might be midway through our winter of discontent but thanks to Brad Green, a tiny spark has been rekindled. Of course I will always have a problem with this "mathematically possible" scenario. After all, the team is five games plus percentage out of the top eight after ten rounds. As Green so rightly pointed out, the Demons will have to win at least 11 of the 12 remaining games and even if there are some allegedly easy games in that dozen you need to ask what is an easy game when you've only managed to win once in almost half a season? The real question is whether Melbourne is capable of turning everything around on its head and performing better than even the most optimistic of the pundits predicted it would when looking at the club's prospects before the start of the season? The answer could well depend on how the Demons fare on the injury front for the remainder of the season after its well documented problems in the first half. Writing in yesterday's Herald Sun, Mike Sheahan made the point that the Demons are facing their moment of truth. He rightly asked whether injuries were an excuse, an explanation or a cop-out in football and pointed out that "the Demons are averaging four changes a week, with most of them compulsory," while, at the other end of the scale, top side West Coast and fifth placed Adelaide average the fewest changes with 1.3 a week. Those figures reinforce the long-held view that a settled team is more likely to be successful. That being the case, it's not only mathematically but physically and mentally possible for Melbourne to double its winning run this week against Collingwood because, for the first time this season, the Demons are likely to go into the game with no forced changes. Adem Yze's inclusion will be a plus for them given Collingwood's past inability to counter Adem Yze in Queens Birthday games. The fact that they are able to carry names like Brown, Miller, Pickett and Whelan at Sandringham is proof that things are getting better. On the other hand, the Magpies go into the game without key defenders Jimmy Clement and Simon Prestigiacomo and with Anthony Rocca and Heath Shaw under injury clouds. So the signs are positive for Melbourne on this front at least for the first time in 2007 and although it would be a stretch to think that the club could possibly string together enough consecutive victories to even draw within sight of the finals, it's something we can dream about on this long weekend. Before anyone gets carried away about the "mathematical possibility" theory, I have to add a further word of warning. I'm not a mathematician so I decided to consult the closest thing I know to mathematical genius - Demonland's resident mathematics expert, Sam the Stats Man. After feeding all of the relevant data into his computer, Sam's conclusion was that the real odds of Melbourne making the finals from the position it currently occupies are roughly around 4,096 to 1 which means the Brad Green scenario of a Melbourne appearance in this season's AFL finals will remain little more than a dream for a while. In the meantime of course, we need to keep our feet firmly on the ground and take it all in the same way it has always been done in football - one week at a time! THE GAME: Melbourne v. Collingwood at the MCG - 11 June 2007 at 2.10pm HEAD TO HEAD: Overall: Melbourne 78 wins Collingwood 136 wins 4 draws At the G: Melbourne 53 wins Collingwood 69 wins Since 2000: Melbourne 4 wins Collingwood 3 wins The Coaches: Daniher 5 wins Malthouse 4 wins MEDIA: TV Channel 10 at 3pm (delayed telecast) RADIO Triple M 3AW 7774ABC SEN THE BETTING: Melbourne to win $2.15 Collingwood to win $1.65 LAST TIME THEY MET: Melbourne 22.9.141 d Collingwood 14.10.94, Round 11, 2006, at MCG. This was one of Melbourne's finest victories of 2006. The Demons were quick out of the blocks with their ferocious tackling and direct football and by half time they held a five goal lead which was stretched to a resounding 47 point victory over the highly fancied third placed Magpies who boasted a better win-loss record (8-2) than they do in the current season. Cameron Bruce was hot, Aaron Davey was simply too quick and Adem Yze up forward was deadly with four goals. THE TEAMS: MELBOURNE Backs Daniel Ward Nathan Carroll Cameron Bruce Half backs Paul Wheatley Clint Bizzell Daniel Bell Centreline Travis Johnstone James McDonald Aaron Davey Half forwards Brad Green Russell Robertson Simon Godfrey Forwards Colin Sylvia David Neitz Matthew Bate Followers Jeff White Brock McLean Nathan Jones Interchange James Frawley Paul Johnson Ricky Petterd Adem Yze Emergencies Nathan Brown Simon Buckley Ben Holland In Adem Yze Out Nathan Brown COLLINGWOOD Backs Tarkyn Lockyer Shane Wakelin Brodie Holland Half backs Heath Shaw Harry O'Brien Rhyce Shaw Centreline Scott Pendlebury Paul Medhurst Leon Davis Half forwards Nick Maxwell Travis Cloke Alan Didak Forwards Dane Swan Anthony Rocca Ben Johnson Followers Josh Fraser Shane O'Bree Scott Burns Interchange Chris Bryan Tyson Goldsack Dale Thomas Alan Toovey Emergencies Shannon Cox Paul Licuria Danny Stanley In Chris Bryan Shane Wakelin Out Simon Prestigiacomo (foot) Guy Richards (omitted) THE OLD RIVALRY J. V. McKay wrote last year about the rivalry between Melbourne and Collingwood as follows:- "A long, long time ago the strongest rivalry in our game was that which existed between Melbourne and Collingwood. For a decade between 1955 and 1964 there wasn't a hotter ticket in town than the one that got you into a game between the Demons and the Magpies. The newspapers would build it up as a gigantic clash between the silver tails and the working classes but it was much more than that. It was THE clash of traditional rivals and the crowds would come to their games in their droves. "All of those who are old enough to remember will nod their heads and agree, saying 'wasn't that a time?' "If you're too young or just can't remember, consider this: - "The two rivals contested five grand finals during that decade including the one in 1956 when Melbourne beat Collingwood in front of a then record crowd of 115,802 to win the premiership flag for a second year in a row, they attracted a home and away record crowd of 99,346 on Queens Birthday, 1958. It's a record that still stands today. Between them, the two sides won 7 out of the 10 premierships on offer. They had some wonderful players too - men like Ron Barassi, Brian Dixon, Laurie Mithen and Frank "Bluey" Adams and Ian Ridley were the Demon heroes while Murray Weideman, Bill Twomey and Ray Gabelich were Magpie stars. Sure, it was a great time but those days have long gone and it's now time for the teams to rewrite the own histories. At the beginning of the year many good judges put Melbourne down as a top four prospect while Collingwood was considered a likely candidate for an early draft choice. As things have transpired, it's looking the other way around. This year, the Magpies have set the standard and their old rivals are lagging a long way behind. Collingwood has the momentum, the confidence and the winning form and that is probably more important than dissecting individual members of the team or looking at match ups, tactics and strategies. Nevertheless, a staunch Magpie fan told me today that he felt this was a danger game for his club but that they would win because of their stronger midfield. He mentioned names like Burns, O'Bree, Lockyer and the younger brigade of Thomas, Pendlebury and Swan. Hmmm... I'm willing to match them with Brock McLean, now in his third game back from injury, Nathan Jones, Cam Bruce, Travis Johnstone, Green, McDonald and a couple of the others. In the big man department, the Pies have struggled with their rucks for years and I can't see any change in that when they take on Jeff White and the improving Paul Johnson. I like Melbourne's forward set up now that David Neitz, Russell Robertson, Matthew Bate and Colin Sylvia are all together in the same team. A couple of them are ready to fire and the fact that this coincides with a weakening in Collingwood's defensive capacity, could tip the balance in favour of the Demons. At the other end of the ground, one duel that will be of enormous interest will be Daniel Bell on Alan Didak. Last year, Didak wasted Bell early and set back the young defender's season as he was banished to Sandringham for more than a month and a half in the wake of his poor form that day. Fast forward a year later and Bell is playing with strength, confidence and poise. He's much more aware of what's needed to mind a quality opponent and won't give any latitude to the clever Magpie forward. If Bell can hold his own in this contest, then the Demons will have turned over another friendly card in their week by week quest to find some redemption from what has been a sad and sorry season to this point in time. Melbourne by a whisker - 1 point.

by Whispering Jack Brad Green's game against the Adelaide Crows last Saturday was just sensational. He made the most of his return to the midfield to surpass anything he had previously achieved in the red and blue colours. His contribution to the side's unexpected victory over an Adelaide team set to make an impact on the AFL finals again this season was exceptional. Almost as good as it gets. However, I was equally impressed with his statement after the game when he uttered those beautiful words: "we're still in the race for the eight." I personally loved this comment although admittedly I also found it hard to suppress a little giggle when I read his words embedded in Adam Cooper's article on melbournefc.com.au. "We're still in the race for the eight." Green's optimism and self-belief was enough to bring warmth and joy to my heart because it rekindled memories of bygone days; of a time some two or three decades ago when you reached a certain stage of a season and you knew your team was a long way out of contention but you held onto your dreams and religiously followed time worn adages about the "mathematical possibility" of making the finals. Most of the time that hope was illusory but you felt that by simply following another football cliché and you took things one week at a time there was an ever so slim chance that your team might somehow slip into the finals if luck fell its way. Like some desperado with a poor poker hand and few chips left in front of him (and therefore a very slight mathematical possibility of winning), you waited for the turn of a friendly card. The friendly card finally did turn Melbourne's way twenty years ago in 1987 when the Dees stormed home to win the last six home and away games on end. They fell into the final five and once there, went on to taste finals victory after a twenty-three year drought on no less than two occasions. The fairy tale only came to an end when tragedy struck in the form of a last minute infringement by a young Jimmy Stynes that resulted in the after siren Buckenara goal that cost the team victory in the preliminary final. The following year, they played off in a grand final. These days things are different. You need more than luck and mathematical possibility to achieve success in the highly competitive AFL and Melbourne is a long way further back than the 6-10 Demons of '87. Nobody in the history of the game has ever managed to come from anywhere near 0-9 to make the finals. Long ago and far away, nine games were half of a home and away season. This week's Round 11 clash marks the half way point. We might be midway through our winter of discontent but thanks to Brad Green, a tiny spark has been rekindled. Of course I will always have a problem with this "mathematically possible" scenario. After all, the team is five games plus percentage out of the top eight after ten rounds. As Green so rightly pointed out, the Demons will have to win at least 11 of the 12 remaining games and even if there are some allegedly easy games in that dozen you need to ask what is an easy game when you've only managed to win once in almost half a season? The real question is whether Melbourne is capable of turning everything around on its head and performing better than even the most optimistic of the pundits predicted it would when looking at the club's prospects before the start of the season? The answer could well depend on how the Demons fare on the injury front for the remainder of the season after its well documented problems in the first half. Writing in yesterday's Herald Sun, Mike Sheahan made the point that the Demons are facing their moment of truth. He rightly asked whether injuries were an excuse, an explanation or a cop-out in football and pointed out that "the Demons are averaging four changes a week, with most of them compulsory," while, at the other end of the scale, top side West Coast and fifth placed Adelaide average the fewest changes with 1.3 a week. Those figures reinforce the long-held view that a settled team is more likely to be successful. That being the case, it's not only mathematically but physically and mentally possible for Melbourne to double its winning run this week against Collingwood because, for the first time this season, the Demons are likely to go into the game with no forced changes. Adem Yze's inclusion will be a plus for them given Collingwood's past inability to counter Adem Yze in Queens Birthday games. The fact that they are able to carry names like Brown, Miller, Pickett and Whelan at Sandringham is proof that things are getting better. On the other hand, the Magpies go into the game without key defenders Jimmy Clement and Simon Prestigiacomo and with Anthony Rocca and Heath Shaw under injury clouds. So the signs are positive for Melbourne on this front at least for the first time in 2007 and although it would be a stretch to think that the club could possibly string together enough consecutive victories to even draw within sight of the finals, it's something we can dream about on this long weekend. Before anyone gets carried away about the "mathematical possibility" theory, I have to add a further word of warning. I'm not a mathematician so I decided to consult the closest thing I know to mathematical genius - Demonland's resident mathematics expert, Sam the Stats Man. After feeding all of the relevant data into his computer, Sam's conclusion was that the real odds of Melbourne making the finals from the position it currently occupies are roughly around 4,096 to 1 which means the Brad Green scenario of a Melbourne appearance in this season's AFL finals will remain little more than a dream for a while. In the meantime of course, we need to keep our feet firmly on the ground and take it all in the same way it has always been done in football - one week at a time! THE GAME: Melbourne v. Collingwood at the MCG - 11 June 2007 at 2.10pm HEAD TO HEAD: Overall: Melbourne 78 wins Collingwood 136 wins 4 draws At the G: Melbourne 53 wins Collingwood 69 wins Since 2000: Melbourne 4 wins Collingwood 3 wins The Coaches: Daniher 5 wins Malthouse 4 wins MEDIA: TV Channel 10 at 3pm (delayed telecast) RADIO Triple M 3AW 7774ABC SEN THE BETTING: Melbourne to win $2.15 Collingwood to win $1.65 LAST TIME THEY MET: Melbourne 22.9.141 d Collingwood 14.10.94, Round 11, 2006, at MCG. This was one of Melbourne's finest victories of 2006. The Demons were quick out of the blocks with their ferocious tackling and direct football and by half time they held a five goal lead which was stretched to a resounding 47 point victory over the highly fancied third placed Magpies who boasted a better win-loss record (8-2) than they do in the current season. Cameron Bruce was hot, Aaron Davey was simply too quick and Adem Yze up forward was deadly with four goals. THE TEAMS: MELBOURNE Backs Daniel Ward Nathan Carroll Cameron Bruce Half backs Paul Wheatley Clint Bizzell Daniel Bell Centreline Travis Johnstone James McDonald Aaron Davey Half forwards Brad Green Russell Robertson Simon Godfrey Forwards Colin Sylvia David Neitz Matthew Bate Followers Jeff White Brock McLean Nathan Jones Interchange James Frawley Paul Johnson Ricky Petterd Adem Yze Emergencies Nathan Brown Simon Buckley Ben Holland In Adem Yze Out Nathan Brown COLLINGWOOD Backs Tarkyn Lockyer Shane Wakelin Brodie Holland Half backs Heath Shaw Harry O'Brien Rhyce Shaw Centreline Scott Pendlebury Paul Medhurst Leon Davis Half forwards Nick Maxwell Travis Cloke Alan Didak Forwards Dane Swan Anthony Rocca Ben Johnson Followers Josh Fraser Shane O'Bree Scott Burns Interchange Chris Bryan Tyson Goldsack Dale Thomas Alan Toovey Emergencies Shannon Cox Paul Licuria Danny Stanley In Chris Bryan Shane Wakelin Out Simon Prestigiacomo (foot) Guy Richards (omitted) THE OLD RIVALRY J. V. McKay wrote last year about the rivalry between Melbourne and Collingwood as follows:- "A long, long time ago the strongest rivalry in our game was that which existed between Melbourne and Collingwood. For a decade between 1955 and 1964 there wasn't a hotter ticket in town than the one that got you into a game between the Demons and the Magpies. The newspapers would build it up as a gigantic clash between the silver tails and the working classes but it was much more than that. It was THE clash of traditional rivals and the crowds would come to their games in their droves. "All of those who are old enough to remember will nod their heads and agree, saying 'wasn't that a time?' "If you're too young or just can't remember, consider this: - "The two rivals contested five grand finals during that decade including the one in 1956 when Melbourne beat Collingwood in front of a then record crowd of 115,802 to win the premiership flag for a second year in a row, they attracted a home and away record crowd of 99,346 on Queens Birthday, 1958. It's a record that still stands today. Between them, the two sides won 7 out of the 10 premierships on offer. They had some wonderful players too - men like Ron Barassi, Brian Dixon, Laurie Mithen and Frank "Bluey" Adams and Ian Ridley were the Demon heroes while Murray Weideman, Bill Twomey and Ray Gabelich were Magpie stars. Sure, it was a great time but those days have long gone and it's now time for the teams to rewrite the own histories. At the beginning of the year many good judges put Melbourne down as a top four prospect while Collingwood was considered a likely candidate for an early draft choice. As things have transpired, it's looking the other way around. This year, the Magpies have set the standard and their old rivals are lagging a long way behind. Collingwood has the momentum, the confidence and the winning form and that is probably more important than dissecting individual members of the team or looking at match ups, tactics and strategies. Nevertheless, a staunch Magpie fan told me today that he felt this was a danger game for his club but that they would win because of their stronger midfield. He mentioned names like Burns, O'Bree, Lockyer and the younger brigade of Thomas, Pendlebury and Swan. Hmmm... I'm willing to match them with Brock McLean, now in his third game back from injury, Nathan Jones, Cam Bruce, Travis Johnstone, Green, McDonald and a couple of the others. In the big man department, the Pies have struggled with their rucks for years and I can't see any change in that when they take on Jeff White and the improving Paul Johnson. I like Melbourne's forward set up now that David Neitz, Russell Robertson, Matthew Bate and Colin Sylvia are all together in the same team. A couple of them are ready to fire and the fact that this coincides with a weakening in Collingwood's defensive capacity, could tip the balance in favour of the Demons. At the other end of the ground, one duel that will be of enormous interest will be Daniel Bell on Alan Didak. Last year, Didak wasted Bell early and set back the young defender's season as he was banished to Sandringham for more than a month and a half in the wake of his poor form that day. Fast forward a year later and Bell is playing with strength, confidence and poise. He's much more aware of what's needed to mind a quality opponent and won't give any latitude to the clever Magpie forward. If Bell can hold his own in this contest, then the Demons will have turned over another friendly card in their week by week quest to find some redemption from what has been a sad and sorry season to this point in time. Melbourne by a whisker - 1 point.

... and the leader is .... 1. (1) 49 Whispering_Jack 2. (5) 48 canberrademon(herb) 2. (2) 48 Clyde_Cabbie 2. (2) 48 Demonland 2. (2) 48 great_gatsby 6. (5) 47 deanox 6. (5) 47 demon_davey 8. (8) 46 frangas 8. (11) 46 paliosiana 8. (8) 46 Scoop Junior 8. (8) 46 TimDees 12. (11) 45 Alpha_33 12. (16) 45 BigKev Demon 12. (11) 45 bl3281 12. (21) 45 deesthisyear 12. (11) 45 DeMoNiC 12. (16) 45 Go_Ds 12. (11) 45 petejh2000 19. (16) 44 KrazyJay 19. (16) 44 Pinball_Wizard 19. (16) 44 slamevil 22. (21) 43 snarler_0 23. (24) 42 achirnside 23. (23) 42 dee'viator 23. (27) 42 Jackieboy_0 23. (24) 42 Rivers Run Red 27. (24) 41 Goodvibes 28. (29) 39 rusty_corner 29. (28) 38 Kieranbj 30. (29) 37 demon_fanatic 31. (31) 36 Dees_Fan16 32. (32) 34 Fingers Power 33. (33) 33 Dappadan 34. (34) 32 No Cigar 35. (35) 27 melon22 36. (36) 26 jaded24 37. (37) 25 CarnTheDees 38. (38) 18 rusty_kingswood

by Ice Station Zebra Sandringham's golden run of victories stretching from Round 18 of last year finally ended with a 35 point defeat at the hands of a committed North Ballarat at AUSTAR Arena, Ballarat on Saturday. North Ballarat had plenty of time to plan their tilt at the reigning triple premiers and they did it well. Their pre game publicity signalled early that the Zebras were going to have to be at their best to deny their hard running game and high work rate. The Roosters' attack on the football was fierce all day and was a major factor in their well deserved victory. The trip north is always a daunting one and Sandy's task was compounded by something of a hangover from the Victorian State game of the previous week, a heavy injury toll and a suspension. Two players from the sensational victory over the Sandgropers - Ezra Poyas and Shane Valenti - were late withdrawals from Saturday's team. Nick Sautner who starred with nine goals in that match struggled to have an impact in his 200th game on Saturday and was well held by Rooster skipper Shaune Moloney. Chris Lamb missed this week with his one game striking suspension incurred during the Williamstown game while Ben Holland also had to pull out of the selected side. With Chris Johnson hurt early, the Zebras were well down on their usual quota of experienced players for most of the game. Still, this gave a number of younger players the opportunity to step up into the side and Jace Bode, Heath Neville, Tomi Johnston, Rennie Gilchrist, Peter McGettigan, Stefan Martin and Tom Paterakis all came in to the team highlighting its youthful nature. Byron Pickett was the only Demon listed player in the side with a sizeable amount of AFL experience. Gilchrist, from the Sandringham Dragons was playing his first senior game. The proceedings opened in cold but sunny conditions with a light breeze running across a heavy ground. It was a lively start and the Zebras began well but unfortunately twice hit the post in the opening five minutes. Young ruckman Martin was given a tough job on state representative and former Bomber ruckman Tristan Cartledge and he more than held his own in this department. Lynden Dunn was lively up forward in the early stages but with Sautner well covered, the Sandringham attack looked somewhat jaded and the visitors trailed by a point at the first break. Sandy was poised to make a charge and two early goals saw them take a 10 point lead. Chad Liddell's soccer goal off the ground was inspirational. The Roosters responded even more strongly with four unanswered goals including three in two minutes by half forward Dean Chester. You could almost see the home team's self-confidence surge as a result of this burst of inspirational football and North Ballarat went in at the half time break with a 14 point lead. Peter Summers was the only Sandy state representative who was on song all day and the team really missed the hard drive that Valenti usually gives, particularly in the packs. Tom Paterakis was given the difficult task of holding the slippery Djaran Whyman and did a fair job in the circumstances. Sandringham looked lethargic at the start of the third quarter and the home side soon slipped away to a handy 32 point lead after booting three goals in four minutes. Dunn and Michael Newton kicked goals to keep Sandy within touch but it still went into the three quarter time huddle facing defeat and 20 points in arrears. Sautner's solitary goal for the game had come late in the quarter. The visitors tried hard in the last with Newton on fire and kicking three goals but the Roosters had all the answers and a fifty metre penalty followed by a goal to Cartledge put an end to the Zebras' hopes of an unlikely comeback. The Roosters ran out comfortable winners by 35 points in the end. Sandringham will be keen to atone for the disappointing performance but it has its work cut out with another danger game at Coburg on Queen's Birthday weekend. Sandringham 2.4.16 6.6.42 9.10.64 13.10.88 North Ballarat 2.5.17 8.8.56 12.12.84 18.15.123 Goals Sandringham Newton 5 Dunn 4 T Johnston Liddell Martin Sautner North Ballarat Chester 4 George 3 Dignan Feery Whyman 2 Cartledge Gregg Riggio Ryall Trotter Best Sandringham Summers Dunn Martin Pickett Warnock Liddell North Ballarat Cartledge Sansbury Lower Moloney Whyman Chester UNDERMANNED RESERVES BATTLE HARD With a number of regulars promoted to the Seniors, an undermanned reserves were smashed by a stronger and more committed North Ballarat. Shane Tregear and Sam Monaghan worked tirelessly while young Demon rookie Daniel Hayes impressed. He was making his return to the game after personal issues kept him out of football for the past two months and he looked good in passages kicking a very clever goal at half forward. The team remains out of the top five by a game and will need to work harder this week to snare the points against the Coburg Tigers and remain in the finals race. These teams met a few weeks ago at Frankston when the Tigers' seniors had a bye and their team was stacked with Richmond players. The opposition will be much different this time and the young Sandy side will have added incentive to win. Reserves Sandringham 2.2.14 4.5.29 4.6.30 5.6.36 North Ballarat 1.2.8 8.5.53 13.10.88 16.16.112 Goals Sandringham Dunne Gileno Henry Lyall Monaghan North Ballarat Micallef 3 Schultz 2 Gilmour Hartigan Horbury McDougall McHug Raworth Searle Sharkey Spolding Urquhart Waight Best Sandringham Tregear Monaghan Hayes Zarra Gribbin Dunne North Ballarat Searle Micallef Caldow Raworth Head Schultz