2 questions -

was it better than Michael Newton's MOTY ?

do finals goals and marks qualify entrants for the next season?

nope the dont qualify

newtons better

I think Edward's mark was better than Chapman's and probably Newton's aswell, but they were very similar.

Good mark, not as good as edwards nor newtons, besides his hand touched tredrea so should not be a mark. Not that i will complain as that sort of contact was so slight that im happy to see the umpires use common sense for once.

I'm working in the US at the moment with a whole lot of Canadians and yanks, and I just showed them juice's mark...

They said it was "meh."

I couldn't believe it. I knew the yanks wouldn't get it, but Canadians? They know their sport...

Wasnt better than Juice or Edwards.

Equal with spikes, just that chappy didnt use his hands.

Newton has already been presented his award.

Anyway don't think Chappy's was better. Quite a few marks this year better than that.

Certainly mark of the day, but not mark of the year

nah..give it to the Juice. however CW on footy classified seemed to think that the marks and goals in the finals can be contenders for next years competition. i think shes wrong though, NO ONE else thinks that, including mike sheahan.