Bruce is just a good honest player nothing more.

My god, why is that description always said like it is a bad thing?

What facts that he has had one good quarter out of 40, jez he must be a superstar then. Taggers are taggers because they have limited skill but high aerobic capacity, look at ours Godfrey, most teams have one and most of the time they go to Trav or Davey. Don't get me wrong as I said Bruce is a good player he just isn't a star or great player.

Bruce has been one of the few who have been consistently good for us this year and should not be criticised for that. He deserves better, but as seems to be always the way around here, we can't help ourselves but to hold our players to some rather unpleasant and massively unrealistic guidelines. And once a player has a bad run of form or has a great game we shove them into one or the other. And then swing like a rusty garden gate if something changes.

Cameron has had a good year in, up until now, a consistently bad side. His disposal does make me want to weep sometimes (and this will have to get ironed out for the future, because he is a better player than that) but regardless he is still a very valuable part of our current list and should be afforded at least some respect (although that concept is lost in regards to some of our players) for the effort he puts in and the way he plays the game - week in, week out.

WAT u need to realise bate and chook have done jack [censored] in their short time in the game....

yeah, i missed the st kilda elimination final last year too...........

yeah, i missed the st kilda elimination final last year too...........

LOL .... typical.... one game...

i admit he played GREAT...... who was the other BOG that night may i ask HOTDOG??

my point is... he has played very little and has done very little....

leave it at that .. im not here to say he wont go and do GREAT things.....

your quote was that he had done 'jackshit', winning a final is not jackshit = you are wrong. cut out the rubbish talk and say what you mean, if you mean he has done little then say that.

he has certainly done more than 'jackshit.' don't say one thing then whinge about it later. you said he had done jackshit, which i have shown he has done more than. accept you were wrong and move on

your quote was that he had done 'jackshit', winning a final is not jackshit = you are wrong. cut out the rubbish talk and say what you mean, if you mean he has done little then say that.

he has certainly done more than 'jackshit.' don't say one thing then whinge about it later. you said he had done jackshit, which i have shown he has done more than. accept you were wrong and move on

u didnt answer my question...

and jack [censored]= VERY little does it not?

and i dont think one player won the final...

and jack [censored]= VERY little does it not?

jackshit = nothing! hence the expression, thus the reason it is so forceful. he didn't win it on his own, but he certainly did more than 'jackshit'

u get my point tho now... dont you ... hes done very ltitle

and ur best freind was better for 4 quarters than ur man brock...

Brock= very good = still very overrated....