Tim Lane has shown again how biased he is. The article in todays age (sorry technically challenged so no link)is another example how Lane has either developed short term memory deficencies or just so terribly unbalanced in his writings. To mention James Frawley going off and not Fev in 2007 etc etc etc. OK write about tanking but at least give a balanced view of the last 10 years.

I think the general thrust of his article was that the AFL can't call a tank a tank, so therefore cannot investigate Bailey's claim.

You're right though, he did not include Carltank, Feraltank, WestCoastTank, CollyTank...the list of player development/experimentation goes on and on....

Tim Lane has shown again how biased he is. The article in todays age (sorry technically challenged so no link)is another example how Lane has either developed short term memory deficencies or just so terribly unbalanced in his writings. To mention James Frawley going off and not Fev in 2007 etc etc etc. OK write about tanking but at least give a balanced view of the last 10 years.

We are definately the target on this one. I refuse to read any of the printed articles on the matter.

The AFL made this one themselves.