Jump to content

Discussion on recent allegations about the use of illicit drugs in football is forbidden

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'afl just seems to get the fine detail wrong - its a habit'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Demonland
    • Melbourne Demons
    • AFL National Women's League
    • Training Reports
    • Match Previews, Reports, Articles and Special Features
    • Fantasy Footy
    • Other Sports
    • General Discussion
    • Forum Help

Product Groups

  • Converted Subscriptions
  • Merchandise

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests


Favourite Player(s)

Found 1 result

  1. The uproar around Tom Lynch's last quarter point in the Tigers/Lions match would maybe not have occurred if the AFL had rectified this issue following Max's certain goal in the 2nd quarter of the GF last year. Max and the crowd knew it was a wrong call, luckily it didn't cost us the flag but it could have halted the Dogs momentum. This error did cost the Tigers the match. The brisbane-based goal umpire that made that call was in his first year at AFL level and had a total of 15 senior games to date . This is from an unimpeachable source. No criticism of that umpire doing his very best in a high pressure job and best wishes to him - but AFL operations need to look hard at themselves. -its their fault this issue occurred. 'Details' like this are not considered important? I'd pay the airfare up to Qld. myself if I thought it was a finanacail decison by the league to save a bit of cash. Tiges should be fuming. Only Whately seems to have the courage to seriously call out this decison and its all too predictable justification by the AFL Review team in what was a season ending mistake for the Tiges. BTW - that decision went 100% against their own rule of irrefutable evidence to overturn the umpire's call. Explain that someone.
×
×
  • Create New...