Jump to content

olisik

Members
  • Posts

    6,834
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by olisik

  1. With BP being the one to draft players I think it was totally relevant on how many players he was allowed to draft. If it were up to me I would have minimised the amount of players he could draft as much as possible and not go delisting Junior
  2. Most ironic part is Melb v Essendon 2. J Watson 3. J Watts
  3. Tom Macdonald on 0 votes. Lots of love for the Defenders of the game as per usual. Grimes and Trenners also on 0.
  4. Scully on a total of 0 votes. Definitely worth those millions.
  5. Well the fact that they were replaced on the list by players like Cook then yes we did lose
  6. we havn't been in the media for a week. Be interesting to see what the MFC is doing, they must have some action happening that the media can't spot
  7. We worry because of Cook, Watts, Gysberts, Strauss, Morton ect...
  8. lets just hope that this 18 month pre-season doesn't turn into a 30 month preseason
  9. Midfield super draft Melbourne which has the worst midfield in competition takes no non F/S midfielders first round. Some of these people who write phantom drafts are a joke. If we don't take any mids besides Viney we would need to fold right then and there.
  10. I would rather have Cotchin then Kreuzer or Patton which is why we should take O'Rourke instead
  11. Please no rejects from other clubs.
  12. Your on the ball here. I think its mostly abt getting ourselves involved one way or another as it will help our 2nd round Viney cause
  13. Maybe if they bail out this weekend then we'll get some answers next week.
  14. Not bad but interchange list doesn't provide much flexibility or dynamics. 2 talls and Mckenzie. We would need more players with run their i would think
  15. I have a feeling gc may request Wellingham for Caddy but rassilons deal that gets us involved is enough. All we need to do is somehow involve ourselves in any gc trade and we may be ok...even petterd for 3rd rounder or so may put us on their good side.
  16. Melbourne do get a player. Toy GC have pick 4 to do what they want. Adelaide wouldn't be trading with Melbourne directly so I don't see why they would need to give Melbourne anything. I dont see how they would be in any position to demand anymore either. Pick #3 for Tippet is already more then enough.
  17. I think Gold Coast would go for it if it gave them a Trump Card over Brisbane to get Tippet. The downgrade would ultimately mean O Rourke instead of Toumpas. I don't think their is miles between the 2. Pick 3 and 4 beat Brisbanes pick #8 which they will probably offer Adelaide. 13 would not be able to trump brisbane. And Adelaide would love Grundy as a replacement for Tippet, I am not sure who else they would get and by the sounds of it he is definitely leaving.
  18. If they get pick #9 from Carlton maybe a #pick 2 + #pick 9 + Toy from GC for a #pick 3 and #pick 4 would be worthwhile. Would secure us Toy, #2(Toumpas), #9 (Wines), #13 (Stringer, Garlett, Kennedy, Simpson) and Viney 2nd round Would secure GC Tippett + Pick 4 (O'Rourke) Would secure Adelaide Grundy
  19. Does not help our Viney 2nd round cause at all ... GC would be after Carlton's first rounder. If they get it they will bid for Viney to replace Caddy and bump up the pick they get from Carlton.
  20. Rassilon does alot of posts and threads based on that...
  21. They should do an article on 'Who Melbourne isn't in the hunt for' So far it seems like its no-one...
  22. Gysberts, Cook, Blease, Strauss, Tapscott...
×
×
  • Create New...