Biffen

So Agitprop is now a weapon appropriated by the alt right? The expropriators will be expropriated I suppose-only fair.

It's averse SR but with some well timed flatulence ,in an enclosed space,you may be able to evacuate the withdrawer leaving card and cash at your disposal.

It's actually Kantism (Immanuel Kant) who believed individual freedom would achieve societal good if applied ethically. He was no devil but Bizmo has no philosophical concept of his own irrationality.

I don't help people SR. It goes against my predatory nature. If you need assistance there are a raft of arts graduates employed by Centrelink to help those without an arts degree find meaningless work. Failing that,I have a distribution network near the GAT but I pay badly and its high risk employment . Have you tried begging or just sprawling yourself in front of an ATM with a look of utter stupidity on your face?

They point to the Gat as the sole cause of the Fitzroy st strips' decline. In reality it's the rich bogans who've moved in and do not spend anything in restaurants. Kennett got rid of the Catani gardens " meeting place "for the Grand Prix tourists. St Kilda has been a refuge for drug addicts and prostitutes for 150 years. It doesn't need fixing- it needs the shop owners to drop the rent prices - or sell up after 50 years of profiteering . People actually liked it how it was- now they want to sterilise it, get rid of the needle exchange,the Gat,the Backpackers and the nightclubs. Get rid of the bogans- send them to Casey.

I've conquered tinea by not exercising. Flatulence is actually related more to bread,pasta and rice I've discovered in the last year. Hairyness is not much of an issue for most fun loving girls.But with your penchant for deviant behaviour I'm sure the ladies of Romsey are tired of explaining away the wiry greys stuck to their cardigans.

Yes, my apologies. I was ranting more on the effects of feminism on government institutions,media,the arts and particularly universities and the courts. I never sought to condone DV either,or deflect any blame away from the aggressor. Govt grants and health care research are also strongly supporting women too. Its become trendy to knock the straight Aussie white male but we are perhaps the most progressive ,evolved, socially pro-active men on the planet . I never stood up for white men before the last few years but we are not such a terrible bunch. This does not mean non- white men are the opposite either. There is a crisis in masculinity in truth.

Presumably these conversations were business related.Trump having admitted he hosted a beauty pageant there. If he spoke with Putin it would be through an interpretor surely. Is there some suggestion he passed on state secrets to the Kremlin? If he did so those secrets were leaked by the Obama administration as Trump was then a citizen and not a politician. If some journalist has proof of any wrongdoing they would print it.Otherwise it's only more smear . The sackings by Trump were more for perceived weakness in dealing with a malicious media as I view it.

Surveys recorded 88% of news articles were anti-Trump across the USA. Of those- many were Vox pops of ordinary citizens. I'm not sure what the Russian story is all about- is it a communist scare coming from democrats? I'm sure both sides used dirty tricks,including surveillance - so fair game. Is it because Putin is not into Pride marches ? Or are the media digging deep and finding nothing apart from " he eats steak over cooked and smothers it in ketchup". The media cannot expect anything but contempt for their political coverage-they are meant to report facts,not embellish,editorialise and prophecise.Never seen a greater pack of pathetic sheep get something so wrong in my life. The Donald treats them with contempt because they've earnt it.

I can't see us winning a Brownlow in the near future.The medal is usually awarded to a standout in an average team.Our mids and forwards will be sharing the votes around if we make finals.

The gender pay gap is a myth. It simply does not exist. You cannot "grind someone into subversion " There is more than equal opportunity for women in the workplace.That's legislation. Of course you would discriminate against a woman if you were hiring trades.They are not strong enough to do the tasks required by themselves so will cost you more money.Female trades are time wasters.Same goes for fireys and cops .Its an indulgence. By a woman's " innate materialistic nature"I assume you mean her body- so why would the courts favour her over a male again? Your second paragraph is an incoherent ramble again admitting women's deficiencies for a job they still chose to do.Your inability to write properly has not stopped you from entering corporate law.You won't last long love. Theres nothing gladiatorial about a court room and nothing stopping women from entering the bar.No swords necessary but a sharp mind.Nor is it necessary to use aggression or male traits as you see it.I can't comment on indirect discrimination either- I can't see or hear it- it is another myth but I will add that men are still free to say what they will to each other about under performing colleagues.I'm aware of what's said about women in barristers chambers. If she's good she gets credit,if not she gets ridiculed - simple. Also,I've never described ALL females as dilettantes.For a lawyer you are wayward with words. I've never stated men have it tougher either. Don't invent quotes.Women are certainly doing better in school and University than men. They are also doing well in the health system.Though I notice some perception of inadequacy exists from male surgeons They are free to join certain blue collar industries ,work night shift,go to war,become CEOs,Prime Ministers or body builders. My rant focused on the courts where woman have had more than equal opportunity since the 1970s for legal redress. Yourself and my friend Moon( who has provided a selfie below) took this to assume I'm a woman hater,a bigot ,kkk etc. You still have not addressed women in the 3rd world because it is where feminism is hopelessly hypocritical.Feminists never stick their neck out for Muslim women . Hirsi Ali puts them all to shame. She has more guts alone than their combined retinue of academic drivellers. Ozzy 3rd wave feminists would prefer to use our courts to make money for being called toots,honey ,sweeety or darl at work. If you call your above post a whack may I suggest you obtain a crisper lettuce leaf next time.

Hunts with the hounds,hides with the foxes . I don't discount his thoughts on sport but he comes across as a smarmy sniveller. Not sure he's ever even rolled a lawn bowl in anger.

The Indian guys I met in a Cambodge Hotel were enjoying the prospect of a good thrashing. I did mention to these fine salesmen of Ceiling tiles from Bangalore that " it's a funny game". We laughed,we chatted,we drank ,I paid,we mused. I listened to their claims about all types of superiority we can expect from the "Jewel in the Crown" as I call it. Only now am I disappointed in myself for tossing out their contact details the next morn. Funny game.Funny game.

I think Rupert has been keen on politics since he was a wee lad at Geelong Grammar Earl. Launched his own satellites in conjunction with the Chinese and Indian governments. Has the uncanny ability to predict global conflict . Strangely silent about The Donald . But I re Kon they might be on the same page . The royal family were rather peeved about him I suspect. Remarkably powerful man to this day.

Inside job ya reckon? Clean hit?

Earl, If I wanted to be extremely wealthy ,or powerful,I would simply bug the offices of the worlds biggest traders in stock or currency exchange. If I wanted to be a political parasite I would need to know my opponents next move. Problem for Hillary was she never knew the Donald's next move .Neither did he most likely. Rupert made a serious error in tapping the Royals who have a superior anti scumbag unit to his,which consisted of some scumbag ex journos and a few bribed cops. Espionage is 3000 years old or more.

An invite to the manor once carried a certain prestige with it DC.

That's easy for you to say from the vantage point of your white,male,heterosexual ,Australian,advantaged,mansplaining,privileged,gender specific,car driving,meat eating,underpants wearing,wallet carrying,employable high horse. What about those of us who would like a safe injecting room in our non- binary 3rd toilet ? You didn't think of us when you made that statement did you? You just said it as though you have the right to express yourself. Typical.

I remember when Jacks main problem was the beard,now it's the hairstyle. Prodee makes a few valid points but it's all ancient history. My footy coach always said"reputations mean nothing" and "you are only as good as your last game". Jack Watts has a PR problem as far as I can tell. I await the article/photo of him with a kid who has terminal cancer,shortly after he has won us another game. "Je suis Jack".

I'm with you Billy. Unfortunately society craves nostalgia. Life is for the living. It seems a little undignified to me.

You can't take that lying down!

So your "general" vibe is that I'm not a nice person. My point was that feminism achieved a great deal then took itself further into a realm beyond equality - into unequal opportunity. Rather than bludgeoning western men perhaps they could take the fight to Africa or India.,maybe help sisters there? Do you not know any men who've suffered unfairly in the divorce courts ? Feminism is guilty of the same oppression it seeks to redress. Your dads email has nought to do with it. You hate the political climate as I see it . Every "ism" ,every ideology will someday become so hypocritical that It will be replaced. So it is with feminism and the spiteful way you sought to defend it proves my point. The corollary you highlight is not necessarily so. Courts are not meant to take sides.They should be about resolution. Halal food is another hypocrisy that simply overrides 200 years of food handling and animal welfare regulations but we can discuss that elsewhere .

I have plenty of loving women in my life thank you Bizmo. Thanks also for your total lack of mental application and your general inability to even describe what has made you so angry. Youve made assumptions based on misguided perceptions. One can be capable of making an anti- feminist statement and still love women. Best you don't argue with me. You lack the armoury,wit and charisma to present a challenge,let alone a point.

Well done you. A stinging and erudite rebuke , unequivocally put! You have failed to address a single point in reference to divorce,courts,second and third wave feminism,the relative lack of interest in the plight of third world women and male suicide. You did manage to get KKK into the sentence. I shall note not to use public forums for my repressed anger and vitriol. May I suggest you not jump to conclusions. Dont they teach manners in feminist studies ?

Did not help the Marquis de Sade.