Biffen

Ok-Then my entire post is irrelevant. If it was the game prior then they sent him in with low confidence. Amended.

I"m concerned we still have a problem coach. This may sound like a knock on Goody,and it is to a degree.But it is not unsalvageable . We tend to go from overly compassionate (Bailey/Roos) to emotionless/overly authoritarian (Goody/Neeld) Flicking from one of these important traits to the other-Lurching as we are in rough waters. It's a symptom of where we are at that only Roos(the most well balanced of the last few) has gotten the most out of Watts. Still think it will be such a shame if he goes and I think it will be a mistake. What I cannot see for Watts is that he will survive in a club like Port Adelaide. Watts will despise being in a place like Port Adelaide. There is no way he will end up there with their bogan fans and moron President. Goodwin must take the blame for the dropping of Watts in the second last game-ruining confidence against a team that Watts knew he had destroyed with his own individual brilliance the last time they played.Buckley would have been relieved.It was a gross error by Goodwin and one he will compound if he Trades the enigmatic Watts. As our leader, it is ABSOLUTELY a failure that Goodwin has done this and is now trying to literally make his problem disappear. The best result would be if we cannot get a deal done and these two come to an understanding of each other-even though their personalities are very different.

Goodwin for Hinkley would have been a nice deal.

Any source besides a mate of a mate?

Seems like Goodwin has been handed the keys to a rebuilt Monaro and it intent on stacking it into a light pole. Trade Watts for what exactly-better be Vines,Robbie Gray or Dixon. The rest are shyte.

Can somebody bump the post QB game thread please to verify the schizophrenia of MFC supporters when discussing this brilliant, but poor tackling player.

They may have a free time slot on Australia Day DC.

Wrong again Jara. No conflict at all. Good luck to the homosexuals.I'd prefer a decadent society to one controlled by latent, down low ,religious,pedo,homosexuals .Prefer out gays to the other lot.I'd love the govt to turn Mosques over to the gays for the ceremonies.I really would enjoy that.Gays would too I reckon.

He was right behind Cale Morton in a draft, from memory. He's got awesome tuff stickers.

We got rid of him because he liked to drink beer in his undies when he wasn't training. Leigh Matthews let him do it as long as he never missed a (training) session.

Just Josh Kellythen no more. Id like Grinter to mentor Jack Watts throughout the pre season.

Yes we need more division and social upheaval .Forget about minimum wages,1st home buyers,Chinese capital becoming our landlords- we need to drop another bilion or two for rights that already exist.

I'm not sure why this survey is happening- but the effects of it are that people are discussing the issue. The predicted suicides are not occurring to my knowledge. Those on the NO side are bemoaning the costs to the whole nation of what would be straight forward had Labor or Liberal been in control of both Houses of Parliament . The No side are stating that the legal rights already exist in terms of wills,separation,equal ops etc. So basically we are arguing for the right to hold Wedding parties for the gay community- as if their social life isn't already lotsa fun! But I understand it is nice to have a big Wedding- legally recognised. Every girls dream,big day, happy memories. The only issue I can see occurring will be if legally married Ozzie men walk hand in hand in say ,Malaysia, and then expect our diplomats to get them out of prison. There will likely be some legal conundrums to follow that I can't yet predict fully. I had some gay neighbours once that liked to belt crisp out of each other- always a fair fight mind you as they were of similar size. I think the big cost and controversy will come from IVF ,surrogacy,fertility treatments- which skyrocket the debate into the stratosphere and bring in the question of biological design,God,tax,Drs rights to say no.landlords rights to choose tenants,day care costs etc.

Now - finally some sense from DC.

Put quite simply- there is a dept of immigration .There is no dept of homosexuality .Ot is illegal to discriminate against homosexuals already. The problem for DIAC is that every mp / senator can write a letter to excuse/ assist an immigrant . Gay rights are established and indisputable .The problem you raise of representation is the huge flaw in Democracy and yet to be solved.

It will only take one person to break the glass door,,i mean, ceiling.And then the rest will follow through and dominate.

Whale Oil Beef Hooked

Barry Hall is a giant sissy who would not know how to fight his way out of a paper bag. He is an ugly MF with no brain and no balls (God I love being a tough anonymous keyboard warrior).

Yes we are the worst at this. Prior to Nietz , the Tulip was the games holder on 272 ,which is low. Jones will probably crack the 350 Inshallah.

Well said.

No the Immigration issue is very much something all Australians are entitled to have an opinion on. One of the primary pre-requisites of a sovereign state is that it issues it's own visas and passports. In a town like Melbourne,which has grown 48% in 10 years I wished more people did have an opinion on it. It's central to the housing crisis and the stagnation of our wages. Aborigines are not a minority issue because they are first and foremost Australians. My issue is with the Left and their constant pandering to minorities-who they don't respect as people-only as votes. One day you might see a pattern and realise there is an orchestrated campaign, using violence protest as a back up ,to create civil war in this nation for no good reason.There is an endemic problem in our Unis and Media ,who are now trying to control speech itself. there was a time when homosexuals went about being excellent citizens, winning awards, writing world class novels, ballets etc. Now they are political activists-revolting.

and sexual monogamy

yes and I'm aware that marriage begun as a way to keep wealth within the upper classes but was soon copied by the masses. I'm not actually against it-just the way the YES vote has been prosecuted and agitpropped to death.

Mo and her partner were spectacular on the carpet I must say.

[censored] with language as much as you like-it's a minority issue.Another one that dominates our Parliament and media.