Undeeterred

This. He'd be mad to go to Hawthorn the second this year is done.

Very much mirrors what I remember of the Scully/Trengove situation, where Trengove signed up long term after 186, whereas Scully was very, very silent.

I think it is more likely that they did their mid season review after the bye, and are literally just moving down the list signing up their priorities now. They'll have started with TMac and, given he isn't announced yet, I'd be surprised if he has signed or will sign in the immediate future.

Where was this article? If true, that is absolutely hilarious. What an utter dipsh!t.

Just a shame about the quality of the people who seemed to be on it! That amplified the angst, I think - the quantity is really good, as you suggest.

What is it with Demonland posting half our posts twice all the time?

I'm not entirely sure of the alternative, but if Dunn goes to Cloke, we're screwed.

I'm not entirely sure of the alternative, but if Dunn goes to Cloke, we're screwed.

I've always wondered about this 'can't afford to pay the cap' stuff. Surely, the AFL should just fund the salary cap and keep it completely quarantined from all other club spending and revenue. That will sort it out - if you don't spend it, you don't get it. However, the flip side of course is that forcing clubs to pay out the whole lot doesn't mean squat - our ability to attract free agents is not a $$ problem, it is a credibility problem. Paying 100% of the cap will just result in blokes like Tapscott and Blease being paid way overs.

Jamar 14th in hitouts is pretty interesting, given he's only played a couple of games!

What the hell happened to Spencer's ankle? All of a sudden he looks like he's out for most of the year! Shame for Clisby too - he was right on the verge a couple of times and I'd be surprised if he got back in now this year.

You clearly missed mine, and you're the one who attacked first. Who said we were a shoe-in? I certainly didn't - you'd have to be mad.

What a ridiculous post. Would you rather have, for example, Vince, Tyson and Viney, or our emergencies: Toumpas, McKenzie and Nicholson? Use your brain.

Gee, Monfries, Hartlett and Cassisi are good outs for us...

I think the club and list is pretty much exactly where we should expect it to be. Don't forget, with our run after the bye we'll still be looking at probably 6-7 wins, which to be fair is the minimum we should really have expected this year. Next year is when we really take off, I think.

I think the club and list is pretty much exactly where we should expect it to be. Don't forget, with our run after the bye we'll still be looking at probably 6-7 wins, which to be fair is the minimum we should really have expected this year. Next year is when we really take off, I think.

Would you go interstate on a work trip on your wife's due date (assuming you're male of course)? Why would Nathan Jones, just because he's a footballer?

Only my view of course, but I'd take off the rose-coloured glasses and go with the fact that we were either the only ones who offered him another year, or there were a very small number and we offered the best money.

That just proves what everybody is saying above. W@NKER. (Him, not you).

It clearly isn't us. He talks about his team having success. I reckon he's from Hawthorn, to be honest.

Probably means they've chopped off his foot or something.

How many weeks did Chapman get? Surely we should be deterring actions, not impacts. So sticking your elbow into a guys face should warrant a far harsher penalty than Viney's 'brace'. No?

Gee, no change is interesting...

You're fast becoming one of my favourite posters.

I know he feeds on this, but I know he reads this site, so I can't help myself. Lick my swingers, pal.