-
2024 AFL Grand Final
On the back of Daisy Thomas being referring to as Daisy Pearce at the start of the game
-
2024 AFL Grand Final
No, pagan played 143 games for North and South Melbourne. That was a brain fade by BT referring to Fagan as Pagan…
-
2024 AFL Grand Final
Funny how all year we hear about the fact that wining center clearance doesn’t matter as much as the importance of scoring on turnover. Yet here we are and the lions are winning 10-6 swans and scoring from them too.
-
Nathan Bassett to Dees as Forwards Coach?
By the same logic, does this mean head coaches can only be sourced from former players who played forward, back and midfield? Seems like it would be a very limited pool of applicants…
-
Dan Houston
Does the word Duh mean anything to you… Nice throwback. Definitely one of their better albums.
-
Christian Petracca
Perhaps Petracca blames the ‘play through pain’ mantra on his own decision to return to the field after the injury, and that it might have exacerbated the extent of his injuries? Any reasonable person suffering an injury like this on the job is naturally going to begin to question how and why it happened, even if it was largely an accident…and you could imagine he might be feeling like even though it was his decision to return to the field (presumably with guidance from the medicos on the bench), he might have done otherwise if not for the performance team impressing on the players the play through pain mantra.
- POSTGAME: Rd 05 vs Essendon
- GAMEDAY: Rd 03 vs Sydney
- GAMEDAY: Rd 03 vs Sydney
- GAMEDAY: Rd 03 vs Sydney
- GAMEDAY: Rd 03 vs Sydney
- GAMEDAY: Rd 03 vs Sydney
- GAMEDAY: Rd 03 vs Sydney
- GAMEDAY: Rd 03 vs Sydney
-
Trade and Free Agency rumours
I thought this was a interesting article from the Age: https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/cats-10-goals-up-even-before-landing-henry-dees-rely-on-the-replacements-20221012-p5bpcj.html Given the situation with Geelong being able to pay players less, which lets face it, is not simply because of 'lifestyle' and 'culture' but also because of that fact there is a significantly lower average cost of living in Geelong compared to all the other major Australia cities (between 10-24% lower according to this website: https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/compare_cities.jsp?country1=Australia&country2=Australia&city1=Brisbane&city2=Geelong&tracking=getDispatchComparison). So surely on that basis Geelong ought to have a lower salary cap than all other teams,if the cap if meant to provide some form of equalization? Seems a no brainer for me and would be very similar to other types of companies and organizations that adjust salaries based on the the location of the job (and the associated cost of living).