Jump to content

Rogue

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rogue

  1. Rogue replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I'm sure they'll be happy to continue taking your money It's not at all surprising, although I do think the number of supporters donating money will grow. Many supporters feel their membership is a donation, and that's already at least ~$165 for the standard 11-game membership. I can understand that many supporters have other priorities.
  2. Rogue replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Hopefully it didn't cost us anything - " Last night, the Club’s naming rights partner Primus, gave the Club use of one of the Primus call centres for a Debt Demolition Telethon." http://www.melbournefc.com.au/tabid/7415/D...px?newsid=66050
  3. Rogue replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    At $0.20 p/call you'd only need one $20 donation p/100 calls to break even, and I'd be disappointed if... a) the Club were spending that much on calls B) the calls didn't prompt more donations
  4. Rogue replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    $75K in the past few days isn't bad.
  5. Rogue replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I think the aim is to wipe $3M in August, and you're right to be worried - I'm not sure we'll make it to $3M, and can't see us entirely demolishing the debt. However, it's still been a great effort to raise so much money, and I'm sure there's more to come. I'm certain I read about an event planned for those who want to donate $500+, but I haven't seen any more info on that in the members email, debtdemolition site, etc.
  6. Rogue replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Fair enough, as long as you don't complain about figures from other Clubs taking little pot shots at us Haha.
  7. Rogue replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Two wrongs make a right?
  8. Rogue replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    On the Collingwood thing, I'm sure it was just for show. However, we do score $500K from each QB game, as we're always taking the gate - wouldn't want to upset that applecart.
  9. Rogue replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    If so, then there was no 'payout' at all - we had simply already paid him for work that he had done (ie. wages). I think it would be unlikely that there was no severance pay. It seems more likely that the 'payout' is equal to three months of work, as has been reported: "McNamee lasted only 106 days, but will receive a payout believed to be $115,000, equal to three months of his annual salary at Melbourne." http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/stor...5016161,00.html "The Demons are contractually obliged to give the departing chief executive a payout of about $115,000." http://news.realfooty.com.au/sport/paul-mc...80723-3jmn.html If there was in fact no payout, we've done a terrible PR job.
  10. Rogue replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    My understanding is that there was a three month 'payout'... However, with Spargo acting as CEO for nothing for at least that period of time, it's a non-issue.
  11. Rogue replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    From memory, the raffle is for footy department funds.
  12. Rogue replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I think that would have been significantly more work than the current debt demolition site, which looks like it was slapped together pretty quickly.
  13. Rogue replied to w00dy's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    That's silly. We're going to have a CEO work for free for the next couple of months, so we won't be paying any more than what we'd done if we'd kept McNamee for the next couple of months and not had to pay him out.
  14. Rogue replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Other Sports
    In some respects I agree with you, but on balance, I don't think postponing matches is a better option that using D/L. As a contest, it's less than ideal to postpone - for one, the conditions can change markedly from day to day, and they have such a big impact (ie. bowling on an overcast day with soggy outfield, and then batting on a sunny day with quick outfield). I also think it'd be unsatisfying for fans, who are keen to see a result. However, the major issue is logistical - travel itineraries, broadcasting, ground hire, staffing, etc. A bit vague comment. Care to share? I hope Katich gets a run in the Test matches. If he does, he'll need to capitalise. Likewise, Hodge who I think will be finished at that level unless he performs extraordinarily well (in which case he may forestall the end). The bowling will be the more interesting - and potentially painful - aspect, though. I think it'll be a good test for Mitchell Johnson, in particular (ignoring the spinner, likely to be Cullen).
  15. Rogue replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Other Sports
    What do you find odd? Given the number of wickets Aus had remaining, if Aus had known it was a 40-over game they could have played more aggressively, thus making a bigger score than 175 (41 overs at 4.28). D/L is generally okay, although the lower the overs get, the more oddities it can throw up.
  16. Rogue replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Other Sports
    LBW by Clark, apparently. Geez, Chanderpaul has had a great series.
  17. Rogue replied to Apocalypse XXXI's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Hehe :D
  18. Rogue replied to Old Man Rivers's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Certainly some guys mentioned that I'd forgotten about. I'm not sure guys like Charles, Collins, Jackovich, or Shanahan could be called 5 minute wonders though