-
Posts
14,647 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by jnrmac
-
I think where your interpretation of this rule is wrong is that Cross got to the ball first. No way should that free have been paid.
-
Begs the question why you even post here. Pzzzz off. You have been banging on about Toumpas for two years. Give it a rest . We don't need or want ppl like you.
-
No I dont think Wiliams was....
-
New Proverb - If at first you don't succeed you are not Jack Viney
-
When the boogeyman goes to sleep at night he checks his wardrobe for Jack Viney...... Be afraid Bulldogs..
-
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
jnrmac replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
Well done DC. Like I said read my post. "Probably 1/50th of the number you refer to." means that I am guessing the number. But I do seem to recall reading the number was less than 1000. No one really knows do they? Except they do know it wasn't 50000 -
No but it goes to the duty of care argument. How can Viney be responsible for ALL of the damage if he wasn't wearing one. Players must try to mitigate potential damage. To use an extreme (and unlikely) example imagine an NFL footballer not wearing padding and becoming injured. Surely any damage would not be the fault of the tackler.
-
Didn't Hodge get off on appeal? http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/hawthorn-captain-luke-hodge-wins-tribunal-challenge-against-rough-conduct-charge/story-fndv8os9-1226664950294 Just sayin.....
-
Only if you believe Viney bumped and had a realistic alterative to avoid a collision. I don't believe either of those things. IMO its not the rule at fault its the interpretation.
-
Particularly as the majority owner is Hastings Funds Management started by ...........................................Mike Fitzpatrick....
-
Can you tell Bail to start the game like he did last week with 4 clearances..and a goal. Thx SATY
-
I believe three different MRP members
-
If true, he has a duty of care to himself to wear a mouthguard to mitigate any potential impacts. Works the same way with insurance...
-
How to protest against the AFL's decision to suspend Viney
jnrmac replied to Jarka's topic in Melbourne Demons
The real power base is the broadcasters. Tell them you won't be watching any more.... They don't accept email complaints but complaints can be made via: Please contact the Seven Network through one of the following methods: Phone: (02) 8777 7777 Fax: (02) 8777 7180 Mail: Seven Network PO BOX 777 PYRMONT NSW 2009 If they got 20000 complaints that would set them off.... -
Theres already one on The AGE website that was 90/10 against the AFL when I last looked. http://www.theage.com.au/polls/afl/vote-jacks-injustice-20140506-37utr.html Vote away its now 87/13
-
Why does the AFL need an SC to argue their case?? Why do the players defending not get an SC? The comments by Gleeson show he doesn't understand the game. "why didn't you spin out of the way?" Are you kidding? Viney would have been dragged. Watch the thing in real time and its awesomely fast. Viney would have done a knee trying to avoid that "were you suspended as a junior" WTF has that got to do with anything other than trying to paint Viney as a serial thug,. How do you define a bump? What is the difference to bracing yourself when Lynch was pushed into Viney? Arguably Viney was stationary with 200kg of players barreling down on him. Open your arms and try to tackle Lynch? If you take it to the extreme Georgiou is as culpable as trengove was in the sling tackle for failing in his duty of care when tackling a player. Its insane, against the spirit of the game and wrong. The rules are to stop thugs and snipers not ball players. This is out of control and wrong on so many levels.
-
Same. I wrote to 3aw and told them my reasons. No answer Have never listened to them again.
-
Georgiou should be cited for failure in duty of care when tackling Lynch. The same bul**** reason they gave for the Trengove sling tackle. Sylvia had his jaw broken - not even looked at.... When it comes to the MRP Melbourne gets treated like carp EVERY FRIGGING TIME......
-
Tell that to Sylvia who had his jaw broken - WEst coast player not even cited.
-
Fool
-
Not sure of your maths.....
-
Those F*****ers on the tribunal have to show they are 'consistent'. They are protecting their other crap decisions.
-
So what about Sylvias broken jaw then??
-
Guilty
-
12 minutes..........