jnrmac

You just did......

The AFL went with the 'one link on the chain' theory, that is, if we can't prove one link then the whole case fails. CAS went the other way and said there were strands in a cable and if one cannot be proved the whole case doesn't fall apart.

Quite a few of the Hawks brigade are getting miffed that they have taken pay cuts yet JOM, Mitchell and Vickery are coming in on big wedge. There's more to play out here, Family Club. Yeah.

Hmmm. Not sure I am too happy to hear that. His best is pretty good but you don't get to see it that often.....

I get that he doesn't rate Mitchell that highly. Had a good game in the GF but some do and are never heard of again. Hes a good accumulator but not so sure he is that damaging and not so sure he runs both ways and can defend as well as he accumulates. Sam M can accumulate and doesn't defend much but he is so damaging when he gets the ball. Anyway, just saying I can see where he is coming from. Time as usual will tell. Remember the Swans kept him in the two's for a long time as there were knocks on his game. They don't appear too stressed about keeping him....

A great story. Look forward to his further development with much anticipation.

Yes but by then the outrage will have died down......a little

True. But they would have considered it and thought it a low probability. They wouldnt have given it a zero chance.

But this is not about money Rjay, this is about honour and clearing their names. You've got it all wrong......It's all about principle....

They had it backdated, same thing. Best you get off your high horse chap.

I wonder why players haven't sued Dank? Maybe they know that he knows what thet took. Maybe has does have records that would incriminate them.... Haven't seen anyone in the media throw this up....... Why hasn't Hird sued him? He has tried to sue everyone else. The answer is pretty obvious.

Maybe now Dank will come out with evidence he claims he has that will support the players.

No maybe.

Maybe we are looking at some trades that will give us an additional second round pick but not as high as the one we already have?

I don't believe that for a minute. It would be highly negligent not to have considered that a possibility.

Steak and gym, all summer

Yes I see where you are coming from. it sure has changed over recent years. Fwds are expected to maintain pressure.

Dunn can't be had for free as he is contracted for 2017. But the spuds on Bomber Blotz wouldnt know that.

He's a genius. Because we have done it two years running, he's tipping it this year. What a spud he is.

Don't get much rest down back.......that's where the fwd/ruck resting player came from originally. As well as being able to take a mark and kick a goal.....

The fact they were trying him up forward shows the coaches were worried about our speed and height in the forward line. He is clearly not a fwd and most of the comments above are spot on. Fix his kicking and he will be a great asset.

Or any of them......

He also doesn't like Melbourne. We promised to rookie him but took Jurrah instead. He was very dirty.

A few losses say not so fast: St Kilda, Carlton Essendon....

Did the dogs no harm! The issue is when to handball and its effectiveness. Too many times we handball to a stationary target or at the players feet etc. Skills that the dogs have shown can be improved rapidly