i would only accept that IF the afl then agreed to start an investigation on 6 other clubs (at least) suspected of "tanking"
i would love then to watch the media "speculation"
talking of angry anderson. how come no "journo" has picked up on his "resignation" and his role in the inqiisition as a story worth investigating
oh thats right they don't do investigative journalism anymore. too costly and time consuming and besides they'd have to find a real journo
??? why?
it still talks of fines upto 500k and penalties for connolly and bailey
that means a guilty finding of some as yet unspecified charge
so why is that suddenly now ok by you after your previous comments?
12 months though is such a nebulous figure od
i wouldn't place too much exactitude to it
anything before round 5 will be a bonus i think based on where he seems to be now. fingers crossed
but what would i know
actually sue, thinking about it, there is no need for the sports scientist to nobble the players
all they need do is hold back the peptides for a year (reminds me of WC just a few years ago)
i thought you were fairly B&W in that the afl could find a way to find us guilty (of "something") and word it in such a way that the gambling commission could not act
You seemed confident that this would be the case
And you poo-haha'ed others suggesting that there was a risk we could lose our gambling licence
anyway this is getting too semantic and you are being pedantic