daisycutter
-
Posts
29,535 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
59
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by daisycutter
-
he doesn't look like he has even played little league......who cares what the mental midget thinks ffs
-
i think he might be MNMkII
-
so there is a "game" silly me, i thought we put our cue in the rack for the season and sent everyone off for early pre season operations
-
what are you all talking about? is there a game on tonight? or is this talk about the cricket? hmmmmm
-
well at least this year we were the hardest side to play against it must have been really hard for other sides to take us seriously
-
one really has to work overtime to find even the teensiest justification for retaining royal as the midfield coach the proof in the pudding has been in the eating and let me tell you it has been inedible
-
a comparison based on for/against percentages would be interesting 1981 1 win 63.5% 2013 2 win 53.6% (as of now)
-
22 not 23
-
as long as they bring their own spitoons bbo
-
thanks od i've already marked bananas under special dietary requirements might even see jack there
-
we are so bad i reckon bbo's lads would get a game
-
this is a really strange club df26
-
he's a nail technician by trade
-
not really frankie, the origins of the terms "public", "grammar", "private", "church", "state" etc bear little resemblance to today's reality those who wish to stick to the historical notion of "public" school are dinosaurs (or anglophiles)
-
no, just a separate thread for grammatical errors and those who refuse to load a spell checker
-
that's alright rpfc, i make allowances for you, seeing as you never had the benefit of a private school education
-
now now rpfc, you were guilty very recently of hypocrasy (sic)
-
probably get the mfc to field two sides - lol
-
or he had a grip on something else
-
yeah, yeah, you're not craig thomson are you?
-
i agree bub.......................i'm just trying to understand an angle that might be used to get the players off at the end of the day unless there is hard proof or danks admits it under oath it may be just circumstantial....just playing devils advocate
-
daily planet melbourne
-
the only way the players can get off od is if asada accept there is no hard proof (ie that would stand up in court) that they were actually injected with aod (or other banned) i.e. a technicality
-
daily planet is not a newspaper od i'm afraid you're getting terribly out of date
-
so, does that mean the afl should withdraw from the wada umbrella? we surely can't sign up for wada but ignore their player responsibility and sentencing protocols, can we? if wada accept this reasoning from the afl the face of professional sport will be changed worldwide
