daisycutter

you are obfuscating a little here asada originate the infraction. quibbling over who publicly issues it is just that asada(wada) have a recommended penalty protocol. If they think the sporting body has not met that protocol they appeal it (and have done successfully)

and.....the only thing wrong with blazers is they weren't made of crushed velvet

i agree, but if asada have trouble pinning it to a specific player and they think they are being stonewalled, i was hypothesizing they might try and stick it to the team instead. just a thought

what's Playboy bbo? some kind of romsey pastime with alpacas?

always good to see how the other half live bbo. makes me more wordly

i didn't know demonology was in madagascar.....learn something every day on here

there is no need to insult ponies.....you could get banned for being ponyist

probably your old mate mjt i'd say bbo or could be that 49 year old dole bludger living in a hotel room?

nah, a single humped camel.....sorry to disappoint the lads

i think he has eloped to demonology

dunn is probably still here mainly because he has a contract and we are short on dosh i wouldn't read anymore into it than that

31 games is not a good run?

They need to get a decent friggin collar - like this Edit; and no it's not WYL, it's some old geezer

quote " impose an "appropriate sanction" against the whole team, which could include loss of points or disqualification from the competition." i'm not saying they would do it in this case, just that it is an option btw i believe they have banned a whole team from competition before based on just some players

wada article 11 i believe sue here is a quote from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/opinion/wada-wont-budge-on-disputed-drug-ban/story-fnd2ikbn-1226627386391# "If three or more players from any club are found to have committed an anti-doping offence, that will expose their whole team to sanctions under the world anti-doping code, to which both the AFL and NRL subscribe. Under Article 11 of the code, if more than two players from any team are found to have committed an anti-doping offence, the ruling body of their competition is required to impose an "appropriate sanction" against the whole team, which could include loss of points or disqualification from the competition. An athlete does not have to test positive to be found to have used a prohibited substance. Article 2.2 of the code says that "use" can be established by "any reliable means" including admissions by the athlete, witness statements and documentary evidence."

technically asada(wada) don't do the banning per se they issue infraction notices the sporting body then issue punishment based on existing wada guidelines if asada(wada) are not happy with punishment they go into negotiation with sporting body where it may get altered on top of all this there can also be legal action

asada do have ways to ban a whole team (even if some/many had no personal infractions) if asada felt convinced that a number of players did take banned substances but can't definitevly say which ones it may still be open to ban the whole team they do have some hard evidence

what makes you think danks (or essendrug) didn't keep records there is no way you could inject that many players so many times without records besides, records would be needed to plot progress essendrug may have destroyed their records but i suspect danks still has his for obvious reasons why should essendrug be "rewarded" for "losing" their records - some precedent that the very fact essendrug don't have records now just further indicts them

i remember once at the g when there was standing room some drunk filth supporter tried to pizz in my pocket fortunately i moved just in time but it still splashed my boots i don't think he liked me but

what do you see as a "light sanction" for players od?

do you mean the one with the fence around it?

"sells the candy" - wtf

we could use the outdoor eating area near the graffiti wall it doubles as a urinal so would be handy

make that rhino + his mate.....you know who

as in hari kari?