daisycutter

zacharey

For all you metrosexuals out there

sue you should take consolation from being put down by the master put-downers of this forum your arguments for the defence were well argued and ensured the defendant at least got a fair trial and retained your dignity unfortunately the jury (whilst behaving like a parliamentary question time rabble) got the right decision in the end

tsk tsk bb, you know a lady never reveals her odds

she might have a tramp stamp where you don't wanna know jazza

didn't jared rivers knock back more money from mfc to go to geelong?

i know a very nice seminary that is reputedly very good at grooming young fellas

if he gets 20 votes next year does that count as = to 10 each for 2 years don't think i can keep the interest up for 6 years

hahaha dp "none are so blind as those who refuse to see"

if you had a bit of martin flanagan's humility you would admit it was inappropriate to introduce partisan politics into a non political thread on a football forum as pointed out there is a separate board on demonland if you wish to politically vent

what the f has andrew bolt got to do with flanagan bolt is not a writer, he's a journo and party political flanagan is a writer and not very party political you sound like someone with an agenda and on the wrong board

as what wyl said plus why would you assume that if they batted first they would still make the same score as they did batting second?

there needs to be very exceptional circumstances to put the other side in first these weren't exceptional, the pitch wasn't a green top the safe decision this test was to bat first the result so far (barring a small miracle) would seem to indicate clarke made a big gamble which failed

yes it was a wrong decision to win toss and bowl first for three games he won the toss and batted for three convincing wins why for the love of god would you change a winning strategy they didn't change a winning side (when they could have possibly justified it) so why change a winning strategy especially against the odds even blind freddy can see that now with 3 whole days to go they will need a small miracle to win and worse they have allowed the poms to regain some confidence when they could have kept them under the hammer

he decided to bowl first

clarke does a blind freddy

ever heard of the mining industry? there's a lot of coin out west

a third one maybe?

didn't realise school kids were an endangered species

for bbo's eyes only....................

i dunno if you were india you wouldn't want to live down by being beaten by that sort of record breaking 4th innings chase having the field spread and getting a draw would be better than losing of course the saffers could have gone the big hit and that would have been interesting with a spread field seems to me both ended up being cautious and letting the draw eventuate

i would prefer it too, but that's not say a better one still couldn't be found i also believe there are teams we don't need to wear a clash strip against i'm also open to having more than one clash strip depending on who we play i hate a predominately white clash strip especially coupled with white shorts i notice watching on tv that both the nrl and a-league, that the predominately white clash strips can be worn with coloured shorts and this seems to diminish greatly the overall white ghostly look that you see with afl clash strips and white shorts if the current mfc clash strip could be worn with red (or navy) shorts it would be a 100% improvement

it's more clubs (and their supporters) than those two who dislike their clash strips there is no good reason why supporters should "like" their clash if they don't wish to

well i don't think every club and it's supporters are happy doing it, so why should they and we be happy to continue doing it? just to "get with the times"?