daisycutter

they can always wait until he is suspended by asada(afl) - surely grounds for dismissal without payment

bananas very cheap at the moment - <$2

maybe he took advice from martin hardie?

we know that red are you suggesting essendon have pro bono lawyers or lawyers on a winning fee only just trying to put it into the discussed-on here context

where does it end? e.g. hypothetical nd afl: pick no 4, brisbane brisbane: player no 1046 jack mctaggert afl: we have a bid of 2034 points for player no.1046. do we have any higher offers? geelong: we bid pick no 6 and pick no 49 afl: the bidding is now with geelong on 2038 points. do we have any advance on 2038? etc

that's true too od, but lawyers always get the money, nothing new here

eagerly awaiting martin hardie's reinterpretation of essendon's legal position

well so far essendon's legal counsel hasn't exactly covered themselves in glory.....................more like gore

tania rereading her notes looking for new angles for tilt at high court lawyers busy fending off investment managers

nah, that'd require a 6 to 7 side team.......afl sevens anyone?

not sure i would agree about the everyone, redleg i certainly have my doubts, i don't believe a good many of the players were simply duped

all true, but it's too early to pass judgement

think he said something for you in his second term, redleg patience

she probably was(depending on timing, obviously) as far as intention went

but i was saying (if my memory serves me right) that she also said it unequivocally in the body of the article nothing wrong with a mild qualifier for something in the future. can still make a forcible statement without being so absolute

wasn't just the headline jnr but she should have added a qualifier such as expected or likely or anything

i remember a chippy a long time ago who's say "herald or age?"

lets be brutally honest nut and not kid ourselves. whatever an australian government did would have little real impact that's not an argument to do nothing but it is a reality

i know you are only passing on what you heard but $6M seems absolutely irresponsible and hints that hird must be holding something over essendon if hird is eventually sacked over "illegalities" i wonder if his payout would stand up if he was paid out $6M the ensuing shytefest would be something to behold and bring the total essendon cost to an enormous figure this saga just keeps on giving

yes, minister

didn't the silver bodgie give the duke an ao

jaysus d-l, wot you bin smokin tonight? when did "lurv" become part of the electoral landscape? you worry me sometimes

where do compo (any type) and trade picks fit into the calculations? are they part of it or excluded (as now)?

could you explain (better that is) the Stretch and Heeney examples in the article? a lot seemed to have been poorly described or not at all and i got lost

the fact that the bidding takes place as part of ND with dynamic calculations and multiple pick shifts occurring real-time would make draft planning a nightmare if not impossible if done this year would be toughest on carlscum (3 fs's) essenscum (2fs's) and the northern academy clubs