daisycutter

more likely the result of chaos theory, moonie. some peasant in japan in the 16th century probably stepped on a butterfly

i don't think a good win this week is at all a safe bet

wrong deity?

more likely just another cfmeu cunning stunt, biffo on the other hand it might be global climate change related (most things are) in which case might be time to emigrate to tassie

does that confirm he's going then?

yeah, dunno why they keep referring to it as burwood.......it's mount waverley (near east burwood not burwood) may as well be romsey as far as us genuine burwoodonians are concerned, biffo

dress: fatigues, flack jacket and body armour

i think all ins will be in

have you got anything valuable, like say juice newton's autograph?

don't be so naive, earl they're all crooks on the lookout for rorting. it's a national pastime for pollies and both parties are experts at it

millions are already on the move,earl, in case you haven't noticed. the world has shrunk and it's got nothing to do with gcc

i feel much more warm and relaxed knowing we are going to lose it's a conditioning thing it's quite terrifying when we win. i get all these strange thoughts and quite delusional no, i'll be very happy, quite looking forward to a jolly good thrashing go bears, bring it on

good news at aldi

there indeed may be, ldvc, but they are rarely enforced and when enforced done in such a way as to confuse most punters this is one of my pet hates imo all use of the arms (shepherding, grabbing, locking, pushing) should be totally banned 3rd man up has always (in my memory) been allowed and i see no problems with it

there you go again, earl. first 20-30% on the modelling now a 5% chance science might be wrong. where the heck do you pluck these figures from? anyway, i don't think you or dp should get too fussed over what abbott says or does. In the grand global scheme of things it won't even make 0.1% difference at most as for you thinking that it is a closed system, you are making the mistake of thinking we know all there is to know about all the factors that effect climate change and warming in particular. You can't just take co2 and methane in isolation. anyway, i'm not disputing that global warming is possible or even probable climate change or warming aside, i'm still very much in favour of minimising pollution, wastage, destruction of habitat, water usage, depletion of scarce resources etc etc with a shrinking world and a growing population we need to get the balance right to just survive. no arguments there. of course it needs to also be done equitably (both locally and globally) and herein lies the rub.....and the politics but all these (necessary) things won't solve the big problems, merely ameliorate them somewhat still think the major difference will lie with our ability to make major future technological breakthroughs rather than pissant things like carbon tax and windmills forgive me, i'm starting to rave on, and sleep beckons

interesting bit of rationalisation there earl. your 20% or 30% variability being an "educated" guess i surmise. yes, if you keep pumping c02 and methane into the atmosphere (and no other factors change) you would get atmospheric heating. but the assumption (in brackets) assumes a closed system and is not realistic. there is more at play as ms marple would say quite happy to believe the globe is warming, just not sure where it is all heading and what if any is the most effective way for humans to combat it i've always believed any solution (to either effecting it directly or coping with it) lies in new technologies, which might be more wishful than prudent, but i am optimistic, i think a far bigger problem (and also begging a technology breakthrough) is our out of control and escalating world population. such a pity that science is a much avoided discipline in our education institutions these days maybe soylent green will be our salvation after all?

yes, grasshopper, yoda was correct (and the video review referee confirmed)

p.s. don't forget the try in thugby and the 4 premiership points for a win though that is a sore point n'est ce pas?

shucks r&b, i had to leave some morsels for you

half of half a glass. i love it, such beautiful proportionality it's also 1/4 and 4 is a motzkin number and the first positive non-fibonacci number as well as being an all-harshad number and a semi-meandric number there was also four noble truths, four earthly elements, four heavenly kings and four stages of enlightenment unfortunately 4 is also the chinese homonym for death 25% also means we should win 5 or 6 games his year and i thunk you might be on the money

which maureen hanson would that be , bbo?

i'm sure a giant of intellect like your good self could work it out if it bothered you

sorry........typo.....meant to say frock

there again, bbo, how many ugly young bag of wind kicking ( ......)s can claim to have a flock of alpacas as best friends

this ^^ love it made my day