daisycutter

we also had 61 clangers today, yes, 61 god help us because no-one else will

anyone got the score? stuie?

depends which holes you are filling in, skuit

spare a thought for the ballaratians..... on second thoughts they probably think it's ideal shovel weather

bought your port membership yet, picket?

rider's just tearing the bombers a new one

i'd only make it play on for a backwards kick/mark if on the backline, certainly never in the fwd 50 at least and i agree on an extra 5 metres distance for a mark, not that i'd trust the umpires to judge it correctly but no worse than now

BT driving me crazy......just hit the mute button

no need to beg f'em

why a headache for injuries? allow an interchange for injuries but can't come back for 15 minutes (or whatever). if not back in a certain time becomes a substitution ruckmen? have 2 and they "interchange" on field (say in fwd pocket). this is what happened in the past or have 1 ruckman who doesn't go deep at either end staying a kick behind

worse than our pathetic effort at the end of the saints game - fmd what a no-no

hope he never has a shower. drop kick

it's the same as the rest of the interchange it's used for "guest" players. usually young promising players from other junior leagues (not sure of fine details)

the idea of no (or few) rotations is not to continue the same style of play and exhaust the players and reduce fast play what would happen is the coaches (to avoid exhaustion) would limit the range that players roam, rather than follow the ball to all ends like a rugby maul. this would reduce the number of players in close proximity to the ball and allow space for the creative players to move in and reduce congestion/stoppages various players would tend to be more positional which would encourage more player on player contests the speed would still be there because playrs won't be so exhausted trying to follow the ball there would also be more onfield interchanges where some midfielders might rotate through the pockets and flanks as used to happen of course it wouldn't happen overnight there would be lots of experimentation before it settled down but the rugby maul style would be impossible to sustain and would go by the wayside (except on wet rainy days where the ball movement is so slow)

how can 4 be equivalent, if not better than 6?

always thought that

by being pedantic on this point you only give the appearance of a zealot

manifestly?

you haven't heard of a large river in north africa?

makes dimwit's timed departure look like a stroke of genius

if i'm being honest with myself, i have no problem with harvey other than when he gives us a bath, but that's different the guy is an outright gun i do have a soft spot for rovers though

the major problem is that essendon have no understanding whatsoever of the definition or meaning of the word cheating and unfortunately have access to too much money

bill, albo, tanya, julia......ffs earl, you sound like a love sick puppy.....get a life, man

can't wait sleepless in burwood

as previously predicted shizenhad costs us 5 goals, so we win by 4 goals i'm on a roll i like the boy