daisycutter

i had two bananas yesterday already up to one by 8am today.......might have a big day

Something new for dee-luded to mull over seems the more we learn the less we know

i'd guess about 6cm, earl

you mean like swanny?

he's already bigger than lingy

i'll say. looking at that i was thinking, sheesh hogan has put on a lot of weight overnight, then i realised it was petracattack

hmmmm, didn't realise timmy had such powers of deduction....obviously a genius pity jab didn't inherit his deduction gene

i could handle that....

'tis a thing of beauty

yep, it's obvious that the human genome must contain a "run through a brick wall" gene. once those pesky geneticists find it, watch out

good pickup

i'm pretty sure some time in the future the afl will ban certain types of tackle it will widely be known as the viney rule

shouldn't that be the next 54 games?

where did you get "only 1" from?

i said off the play.........................are you seriously saying afl players "consent" to this as part of their contract

i believe length of contract is also part of the formula along with the amount

well on that basis, pushing, bumping, elbowing, jumper punching off the play would also be a form of bullying or physical assault ffs, ldvc

fair enough but i would have thought having a referendum next year was kinda "putting it on the table" what's another year after 1000's of years? i'd have thought calling for a referendum was a positive unless of course you don't trust the public?

i respect the russian......but why future ruck coach? i don't want gawn being taught to knock the ball onto his shoe laces

an f can never be too big

depends whether your "faith" is positive or negative to begin with

which was fair enough too you don't vote to abolish something......you vote for a replacement option if you can't elucidate the alternative and convince the populous of its merits you deserve to fail it wasn't howard's fault it was the fault of the pro-republican movement and their untimely haste and lack of preparation/clarification/agreement it was them that set back the movement by decades why are you worrying about the wording when no wording has been proposed? the libs i think have accepted that marriage equality will happen, they just want the direct responsibility taken off their hands

all is not lost choke.....there is still facebook, twitter, etc to restore your faith in the media and your fellow humans

arguments are pretty cerebral lot to do with morals/taboos/religion/cultural types of stuff. stuff you can't really satisfactorily debate intellectually like "I have yet to hear a convincing argument on the existence of god" and vice a versa personally, i don't see anything wrong with a democratic referendum/plebiscite (apart from cost that is) wouldn't trust the vote/motivations of a bunch of self seeking pollies anyway people can vote yes, no or informal. will be interesting how many vote informal

how many fta afl games do you get per week in sydney, sue? we get about 1 fta nrl (i think) game per week here (plus the three soo games) only seem to get storm when an away game and not always then