Jump to content

daisycutter

Life Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    29,541

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    59

 Content Type 

Everything posted by daisycutter

  1. daisycutter
    i take your point (so to speak) but was more referring to his attempt to throw every one else under the bus but just succeeding in digging a bigger hole for his good self
  2. daisycutter
    i did have the fire and brimstone and papist hater rev hale in my mind to personify ykw
  3. daisycutter
    nicely hoist with his own petard
  4. daisycutter
    i can't believe the abc was that far behind.......lol
  5. daisycutter
    or into one, eh?
  6. daisycutter
    wonder what oh&s would say about those contraptions. just looking for trouble
  7. daisycutter
    i see you've not read james michener then? he writes extensively of congregationalist missionaries in hawaii
  8. daisycutter
    don't think papists would be welcome at a congregationalist church, bbo (based on my reading of james michener)
  9. daisycutter
    wonder if james will hand back his mba and ask for his tuition fees back
  10. daisycutter
    good point.........i'll back out now and leave it to the kiddies
  11. daisycutter
    tacky, dumb, stupid for both sender and receiver. no sympathy for either. can't understand how someone would waste their time writing a blog on this. first world problem.
  12. daisycutter
    don't think their partners would be in agreement, stuie. may not be illegal but i thought you had a moral compass
  13. daisycutter
    that presumably was the conditions that hird had stipulated for an interview. alternative = no interview. plus holmes had enough pull at the abc
  14. daisycutter
    what an insult and abuse of the ethics centre
  15. daisycutter
    you could always get a spare 2003 scarf and alter the 3 to an 8 i don't think wada could be bothered chasing you on that
  16. daisycutter
    According to Lovett though that treatment that Reid witnessed was treatment for a shoulder (i think) injury. not necessarily part of the general supplements program. maybe, just thinking out aloud p.s, it also elsewhere in the article states that the 10 injections were over a few days. so what was it? 10 inone hit or not, and what/how many did reid witness. and what specifically were the injections. article is not well written
  17. daisycutter
    i understand the relevance of bringing up the tanking in the context of how the afl "manages" integrity within the sport. but turning the discussion into an afl blame game the same day the players were found guilty seemed to me to be deflecting from the guilt of essendon and the players and served to minimise that guilt or to try and apportion some of it to the afl. there certainly is a need to discuss how the afl handled this and other issues but not necessarily on such a momentous day with just a short time for the program. i'm sure efc were happy for gary to pursue that tangent at that time
  18. daisycutter
    because you don't go looking for things you don't want to find if they might be contrary to your narrative that covers the efc, the afl and the majority of the media, but still leaves a lot of other interested parties. a mystery, same as the other parties key to the administration of supplements. a royal commission or something similar would be required to even have a chance of finding out what has happened to true independent investigative journalism with the courage to ask the hard questions without agenda? when the state government employs 1100 spin doctors what hope do you have?
  19. daisycutter
    sorry, bitters, my bad
  20. daisycutter
    gee luci, you like going out on a limb don't you? lol
  21. daisycutter
    folding dawes?
  22. daisycutter
    the answer to that is yes and no, or "it all depends"
  23. daisycutter
    yes, i had thought something similar. this would probably be in essendon's interest for the 12 remaining players at essendon but what about the other 22 scattered elsewhere (excluding those retired and not working in the afl empire) i'm not sure mfc, dogs, port, saints etc would necessarily be happy with arrangement at their cost. surely there would be an expectation that essendon should bear those costs?
  24. daisycutter
    not sure it was a loophole, more the threat of going to court and dragging the afl over the coals i thought
  25. daisycutter
    assuming suspended players do get some pay, would mfc have a case for the scum to pay melksham under victorian fair trading laws for trading goods not fit for purpose?
×
×
  • Create New...