daisycutter

pedomon?

i see you've broken off your evangelical discussion with our reverend friend, biffo. too much proselytising for one day?

in as good a shape as your jockstrap, bitters, thanks for asking

can't see tha tposing any difficulties for bitters

with academy/father-son picks the pick 26 will slide anyway

think you're right new season, more games under the belt, trade/draft to go, new coach.........which way will it go? half-full, half-empty?

the margin is more than 5 goals......more like 8-9 goals, so i think 11th is safe

wouldn't be surprised if jv has been playing with an injury the last few weeks

wasn't he emergency for seniors?

didn't michael jackson take drugs to make his skin white?

so don't use him as a tagger. vince was the obvious tagger for danger/

ok so essendon is essentially 61% not 60% so in the above it changes the 11 points to about 9 points, so still a win > 100 to 50 to get below so saints roughly need to double their score give or take

depends. if lions lose 61 to 100 basically no change. to drop their % by .5% over 22 games they need to lose by an extra 11 points so if Aints kick 100 they need to kick about 50 (i.e. 61 -11 = 50)......lets say a loss of about 51-55 to be safe

not necessarily. as lions % is 61.5% they have to lose by more than 38.5% to drop their % they could easily lose and their % go up

groundhog day

don't [censored] blame me

just copy this post to your online calendar marked urgent, goffy for the definition of success, i'll nominate it as a contract renewal

AFL oblivious to the concept of conflict of interest http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/teams/essendon/essendon-doping-saga-secret-cas-hearing-transcripts-reveal-afls-hird-hit/news-story/fabb213b37c70f40cb5055d0f3bbc338

i think that might be an urban myth..........................at least i hope so......

was it a liverpool kiss or one of those involving rapid tongue lunging? did you get it videoed?

if they stuck together better and picked their targets astutely they could loosen that noose, but there is not enough made of the right (journalistic) stuff

it's a good point chris, but i wonder how much the noose is real or perceived. another problem is so many of the afl journos are ex players, coaches and administrators so there is still that collective herd mentality.....as distinct from more detatched objective qualified and trained "real" journalists

rita takes a whack at swan's rainbow hypocrisy http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opinion/rita-panahi/rita-panahi-on-sydney-swans-signing-sponsorship-deal-with-qatar-airways/news-story/11dc6fdfa7df36ff58613423fcc4d0c1

there is a large number of the general public who disagree but are largely (not totally) powerless to do much about it. a lot of the "feeding" is also more about reducing costs than really giving people what they really want. but we could go on and on about whether it is the chicken or the egg. ......except we can do something about it, by not buying newspapers, and watching fta or cable tv...........which is exactly what's happening. though the alternative (digital) is not necessarily better, but at least you get more options to choose your content

"you" jnr? you're just one in a long queue