daisycutter

he can probably only handle one agenda at a time

I wouldn't be that cruel old dee anyway she's more rpfc's type - loose and easy

how many exciting time trials till Draft day on the 23rd. don't know if can survive another d'land off season

been too long in a cave with a funny looking dog i think

ouch - left myself wide open there

about the effn thread title not that pygmy scribbler - a positive statement instead of a weak negative one. You're not sharing a bong with chook are you?

not having a go at you, but my sister was a nympho and it didn't help me at all

HTF did you read that into my comments????

because its a statement of weakness, like a little kid at school complaining to teacher about some other kid who doesn't like him get on the front foot WYL, think positive

"Greg Venom - Oxygen Thief"

"Is Greg Venom Brain-Dead?"

Can we change the heading from "Greg Denham hates MFC" to "Greg Denham is a [censored]"? Sends a much more positive statement.

or maybe he means his knee is @#%$ed and he will never play for gws?

Made my morning. Haven't had such a laugh.........well since March 5th anyway

Are you suggesting Dunaden would make a good midfielder? Personally I think he would only be good in a straight line, no agility. Definitely a KPB

much like demonland this time of year

now now BB you knew my point was that he was not "out" in public as was inferred he did do 2 things "right" [1] did his drinking at home [2] didn't drive his car himself nuff said anyway

Look, that's easy to do and I did know the point you were making But, I'm getting annoyed at how many posters on the hang-em-high side are a bit loose with the truth or facts ("out on the turps", "dangerous driving", "leaving the scene of an accident", "criminal offense" "nightclub" etc etc) There's no need to gild the facts in this case. He was an idiot but lets not blow this incident into a capital offense by the loose use of terminology and speculation end of sermon (I hope)

When did a mates place become a nightclub yoda?

It doesn't have to be a negative/positive or good/bad situation. There are many shades between the two extremes including neutral. Re T$, I thought we came out of it either neutral or slightly positive because [a] we fought the good fight we didn't overreact/overquote [c] we were in a no-win situation not of our making [d] we got top compensation in the eyes of others [e] gws were seen to have done a bad deal by many [f] gws were seen as being dishonest

maybe the Nissan Sylvia was renamed the Nissan 200SX in Australia to avoid any bad publicity?

I think (legally) it would be more accurate to say "(or at the very least was driving carelessly)" Careless driving and Dangerous driving are both possible offences under victorian traffic law. The driver could avoid careless driving charges (at the least) if he could prove (or convince police/judge/magistrate) that the accident occurred as a result of an unavoidable accident (e.g. swerved to avoid a dog, brakes failed etc)

Simple....Col wasn't the driver

Dear oh dear Billy, you tell someone else to stick to known facts and then you wrongly accuse Sylvia of committing a "criminal offense" and then claim that was the reason for the 1 week ban. You obviously haven't read this thread or you wouldn't be making that claim

Now you are getting the "facts" wrong here, billy