daisycutter

Yeah, even a $100 would still be stingy

don't you mean parsimonious, hardtack?

these Roy Morgan Research figures would indicate AFL clearly ahead Football Viewing Statistics

I'm surprised, what is your sauce

nicely expressed rangey i was surprised that lane took on dimwit in such a direct manner. normally the press seem more concerned with which side their bread is buttered on when it comes to openly challenging the afl.

there would be no point doing it until after the nab cup at the earliest and even then only when they are ready to select him

Glad you sorted out the right Daisy there dee-luded

Get well quick old dee Time to reacquaint yourself with a few Demons Youtube clips while you recuperate

beats me, (pardon the pun)

the non-sensory variant obviously

North Melbourne 2011 Football Club Doctor Dan Bates is still listed as the NM club doctor on their web site

spot on the money

well I didn't think redleg's comments were particularly political as such and certainly not partisan, but YMMV i don't know why you would think my comments (or lack of) "to be a political statement in itself", unless your crystal ball is very special I can assure you that my objection to politics in footy forums is not party based/influenced but i do endorse your heartbalm comments. Its a well known fact that most heartbalm stories were written and replied to over many boozy staff pub lunches. It was a certain rite of passage for many truth journos.

every one seems to be forgetting Mr X factor Alan Jakovich just loved watching him when on song (and being frustrated when he got sucked in)

You know I had no problems with the Norman clips so why raise red herrings I objected to your partisan political comments on post #1400 and Jacks prejudicial stereotyping of "silver spoons" and "honest days work" (and no I'm not a fan of MF) These were to my way of thinking political flame-bait Now can we leave it at that? BTW check rule 4 of the Rules of Conduct

Surprised? I've made the comment a couple of times previously re mixing partisan politics and religion with football threads or would you prefer the style of 'ology?

I hope you are not accusing me of being politically correct? You are going out of your way to misconstrue my comments Anyway I find the Bex just don't do the trick anymore

I'm not trying to be difficult Lucy. I've seen many forums go to ruin when politics and religion are allowed to spiral. Demonland wisely has a General Board for those that wish to partake of these topics. I'm not saying either that it is spiralling, just pointing out politely (I thought) that this is supposed to be a no-no on the footy board We don't want to end up like 'ology I hope At the moment I like and enjoy the vast numbers of posters here all sharing a love of the mfc. I don't want that number to reduce by half Fair enough? P.S. I'm not complaining of the odd humourus throw-away political comment

This didn't strike me as tongue in cheek Nor did WYL's attempt to throw a bit of petrol on the thread We have a special board just for this.....which I can safely elect to stay away from or otherwise

ummmmmm. fellers this is a football thread believe it or not (bananas are defined as football topics btw) don't pollute it with politics or religion or racism use the general board, thats what its for

James Magner - Jimbo Rory Taggert - Taggo Mitch Clark - Clarko James Sellar - Sello Josh Tynan - Tyno Jai Sheehan - Jyro Leigh Williams - Willo Tom Couch - Tommo

good ones sloonie. i can see why you took your time before posting. lots of introspecion there

i think the 40 player primary list is a MAXIMUM figure not a mandatory one.......could be wrong but

but rookies aren't limited to $50k. He was also in the PSD (I think) where you can nominate your terms. anyway, whats a "a lot more"

out of interest, what sort of money could he make in the WAFL?