Jump to content

DeeSince73

Members
  • Posts

    471
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DeeSince73

  1. 8 minutes ago, buck_nekkid said:

    I think it is because our focus is forward defence, and we always have the option of Gawn/Jackson being down there too.  That means we would lose a Kossie/Nibbler/Spargo type player who is critical to our system.  I would suggest we have 2 key talls plus resting ruck as our blueprint, with a mid forward (frittata) and the smalls.

    Makes sense, thanks. Perhaps if we were a pure attacking team, the 3 headed monster would be a viable alternative.

    • Like 1
  2. Genuine question. Why can't we play BBB, T-Mac and Weed in the forward line? It would be like a 3 headed monster in which the opposition would not know who to go to. 3 distinct targets leading up. If they don't mark, then Kozzie or Spargo clean up.....then there is Fritter lurking around who is always dangerous plus ANB. Seems like a dream line up to me.

    But what would I know....😁

  3. 1 hour ago, FlashInThePan said:

     

     

     These teams lower on the ladder are free to try some really interesting things to penetrate our defensive zone. We will be learning a lot by having to deal with it. It’s not shameful to encounter something new and struggle to counter it, that’s us learning and adapting. I actually think we could have been in trouble if north could have executed the basics a bit better, there strategy for moving the ball was pretty good.

     

    This reminds me of the BORG in Star Trek. We absorb everything other teams throw at us in order to become supreme beings. It seems to be working 😉

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 2
×
×
  • Create New...