Jump to content

Discussion on recent allegations about the use of illicit drugs in football is forbidden

ProperDee

Life Member
  • Posts

    951
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by ProperDee

  1. 7 hours ago, binman said:

    So, let me get this straight, these people who own a deck of victim cards have 52 opportunities to pull out a victim card.

     

     

    Yeah. If it’s the standard deck which comprises 4 suits, Justifying Abuse, Manipulation, Attention Seeking and Diffusion of Responsibility. Players by their very nature are quite skilled in which card to play and when to play it. Politicians for example are given a deck once elected to office and after a couple of terms are deemed professional players.

    Then again if it’s the Tarot version they’ll have 78 opportunities. The danger with the Tarot deck of course is that the player will at some stage play the 22 card.

  2. 3 hours ago, Deestroy All said:

     

    And the mental health card, I’m sick of that [censored]. People use it for anything and everything. 
    Crashed a car, mental health. 
    Caught racking up, mental health. 
    Banged your mate’s missus, mental health. 
    Report on leaky team news, you guessed it. 
    Makes a mockery of people having actual issues. 

    I’m with you DA. Totally sick of the BS. The mental health card is one of many in the “Victim” deck  Sadly nowadays,  there are many people who own this deck of cards who pull one out and play it when it suits their agenda. 

    • Like 1
    • Facepalm 1
  3. Love to see it LH but sadly Jake is a quiet achiever, not spectacular and his surname isn’t Daicos. 
    These alleged “experts” vote on the Rising Star and the opportunity to use the words “Magpie” and “Daicos” in the same sentence multiples times are just too easy to sell to super hyped Collingwood fans and make allotted journo word counts.

    • Like 1
  4. 5 hours ago, 58er said:

    Your comparing local footy last century and training habits of local Clubs is irrelevant with AFL requirements for success in the 2020's! 

    As was proven ( even only for a year or two)  by Burgess You train as you play. 

    😂 And you think I don’t know that? My comments were tongue in cheek. A comparison is ludicrous. Thanks for pointing that out though…..🙄

    • Like 1
  5. Terrible for the young bloke.  As another poster said, a potential star of the comp.  The incidents of serious injuries these days is a worry.  It's almost guaranteed every year that several players will cop a season ending injury.  Just hope that recent serious injuries to Tomlinson, Lever, vandenBerg et al keep our quota as fulfilled for a while yet. 

    On another note, there is a lot to be said of the 70's and 80's version of footy training.  A couple of laps, kick to kick, circle work maybe a bit of one on one/backs -v-forwards and then a sprint to the sheds for a can of VB!  Hell, I even remember blokes having a smoke at half time!  BUT....very few serious injuries.

  6. It's a practice match. A barrier trial. The great Nature Strip is regularly beaten in trials by horses who are not fit to eat the leftovers from his feed bin.   

    I am not concerned with the result tonight. Keep our powder dry and rest our sore guys until the real stuff starts.  I WILL say however that if anyone needs to go hard and impress, it's Sam Weideman.

    • Like 2
  7. 13 hours ago, Cards13 said:

    I played footy against Dfton, without fail a few lads would come down with the Dfton flu on the night before a game. 
     

    Ahhh yes Cards.  The chances of copping a fist behind the earhole or a swift one to the guts was pretty much guaranteed against those apes.  I remember the heavily tattooed McSweeney brothers as particularly nasty individuals.  I had to wait a whole year to repay the favour to one of those bustards.

    In those days (early 80's) there was only one field umpire.  I just happened to play cricket with the guy who was umpiring my revenge game.  I played in the middle and teed it up with the umpire to look and see where my opponent and I were standing and then he would ensure that his back was towards us as he bounced the footy to start the game.  The ball was bounced and the objective achieved.  The umpire of course saw nothing.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 2
  8. Hey guys! Reigning premiers eh? 😜 I still can’t believe it even though I have watched the replay at least 30 times.

    I think Harry Petty did a wonderful job in the absence of Tomlinson last year but don’t forget, Harry was the understudy. IMHO, at this stage of his career, Harry is not as good a footballer as Tomlinson. What IS great is that there will be some very difficult team selection meetings this year with the heat on everyone to fight for their positions. 

    Looking forward to another flag this year and there are no good reasons (maybe multiple injuries?) why we shouldn’t win it again! Bring it on! 

    • Like 1
  9. 17 minutes ago, old dee said:

    Each to his own Scipio. VB is close to the bottom for me. The bottom beer is a drop from the UK called Old Spectacled Hen. Drank at room temperature. It has the honour of being the only beer that I could not finish the glass. 

    Old Speckled Hen. In total agreeance OD! I flinch even when I read the name! Disgusting. VB is too but OSH takes it to another level.

    • Haha 1
  10. 2 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    Which reminds me of the Goon Show and one of the characters, an undertaker, mangling the metaphore by saying, "You've hit the nail right into the lid".

    See The Moriarty Murder Mystery here

    Now THAT is comedy. Thanks for the memory.

  11. Whilst extolling the virtues of the great man, I have a bottle of Robert Flower 2002 signature edition rare old tawny port in a glass and timber display box.  I’m not a port or wine buff and wondering if it would still be drinkable? Advice really appreciated. 

  12. 13 minutes ago, Robbie57 said:

    Pardon me for not reading the whole thread and risking repetition. First Congratulations to Ollie Wines he had a terrific year and to the others over the 30 mark.

    Ok down to business, the brownlow doesn't celebrate the best in the game, just the best in the midfield. I get they tend to be ball accumulators and often are players who turn games but that is not the whole story of the game. For example why should Tmac get more votes than Lever or May? I am glad Tmac was recognised but backmen get no recognition beyond all Australian. 

    It really needs to be addressed, at least forwards have the Coleman which is a pretty objective award, why isn't the coleman medal awarded on Brownlow night?  

    You are right.  This morning I read through all of the votes and the lack of representation by defenders is simply wrong. We know, perhaps better than most fans, that defenders can win games.  There is too much emphasis on possession numbers and none on defensive acts.

×
×
  • Create New...