biggestred

The big question is when did hirdy write this letter? 2013?

Have you got this written somewhere or podcasted?

yeah well thats right. If i asked you to go to the supermarket and get smarties when i meant m&ms, youd go and get smarties! i cant turn around and then say, sorry, i meant m&ms so the smarties i ate dont count!

The only problem with this is that it is thymomodulin that helps with the immune sytem, whereas thymosin beta 4 helps repair damaged tissue. i can see why the essendon apologists would say that he just had the names of his substances mixed up of course, if he had them mixed up from the start then he has still given the players TB-4! of course, if he has given them TB4 instead of thymomodulin and had fantastic results then he probably thinks it worked brilliantly and that he is a genius.

Don't joke about it

Yet Essendon now will happily sheet all blame back to just a few people. It wants us all to believe that Stephen Dank is to blame for virtually everything, and that he is a man not to be trusted. Yet as it discredits him at every turn, it trusts him, and demands that everyone else do so too, when he says he didn't give Essendon players WADA-banned drugs.

http://m.afl.com.au/news/2014-07-09/its-all-about-the-essendon-players Damien barrett recycles caro

i think dank has talked to asada in secret. why else would they not have given him a massive fine/etc etc etc

there is definitely a 2-part tele-movie in this. Or just a movie. actually i think they made it already - it was called Trainspotting

Dank has been presented with the appropriate forum to respond to everything - he was given a show cause notice.......time to actually show cause mate.

Essendon players knew what they had been given, claims Dank old dank reckons they knew what they were given and that the ziggy report is rubbish awkward

I think the AFL might be totally jack of essendon too

good Gil. Good.

Hirdys tan looks pretty good too

And none of them have cancer. Must have worked

Cmon guys, they did nothing wrong

public opinion is different to media opinion Most of the public are smart enough to know asada are not the bad guy and that the bad guy is the ones who injected their players with god knows what and then tells them and everyone that it was safe.

The Dean Robinson thing is interesting. Presumably if Essendon get up and have the whole investigation declared null and void then he would be able to sue the pants off them for wrongful dismissal... hahahaha gold

Essendon continues to duck for cover Caro. Bang bang bang bang. Those logic bullets are epic.

I don't disagree. At the very least the players should be suing the crap out of them

My open letter to Essendon president Paul Little Hes got it a bit wrong in that ASADA has to prove to a comfortable satisfaction that an athlete took a banned substance but apart from that pretty much says what everyone is thinking

Lance Armstrong was both a fraud and cyclings most high profile drugs victim

How the ruck is that a dangerous tackle?

David Evans to reappear in Essendon court case ""I keep hearing quite rightly that Essendon are having counselling meetings with the parents and players and reassuring them they are doing everything and reassuring them that their medical advice is that there are no long-term side effects," he said on 3AW. "I don't know how they can say that because on the other hand both ASADA and Essendon are saying we don't have exact knowledge of what was injected in the clear vials." Those vials were organised by Dank. -doc larkins"

They've lost their [censored]