biggestred

Pretty sure he actually turns his hands into bricks when he tries to mark overhead.

Thomas given a 1k fine for his kick. What a [censored] joke.

Tbh its a disgrace that north were able to rest their players. They wanted to lose. Feel sorry for tiges. Hope sydney smash north. Also - decisions like that not being holding the ball make me hate footy.

If north win after resting everyone last week itll be a disgrace.

7.18 tells the story for the swannies though

sydneys effort and determination is everything i want at melbourne.

freo fans booing goodes. flogs.

Sorry. If you earn the right to a home final you should be able to play that final wherever you like. The dogs should be able to play at the whitten oval if they wanted to.

Except they went from top 4 to bottom 4 in a season, picked up nik nat and co and now top 4 again. Still think the draft should be done on wins (or ladder pos) over 3 years. Eliminates tanking, gives teams what they need.

Won a final in 2013. They can get absolutely [censored].

Its against the rules that will be implemented next year. As of now its just bad form - approaching a contracted employee during the finals without asking.

This is the exact reason why the draft order needs to be decided over the last 3 years. Total up the ladder positions for 3 years. Worst performed team gets pick 1 etc. Brisbane have won twice as many games as us over that time. Yuk.

at least this time i dont sit there and go, how the hell is jones not in there over x y and z? although - Heath Shaw??

the prospect of north beating Richmond after north rested their players in an effort to lose and avoid going to Adelaide (and then demand an apology) while Richmond played a full team makes me sick.

i have a large and illogical hatred of west coast. I hope they beat the hawks while both teams suffer 8x season ending injuries and then lose to the dogs.

Heres an idea. Instead of doing the draft order on 1 year and 1 year alone, Do it on total ladder positions over 3 or 5 years. 18 points if you finish last etc. Highest points go first. Would eradicate tanking on a short term level and give picks to those teams that actually deserve them. Imagine if the hawks had won 2 flags and then been decimated by injury this year and finished bottom 4. they still wouldn't get pick 4 - and fair enough too as they've just won 2 flags.

Freo and west coast Snooze Freo and west coast All perth grandfinal. Mass exodus from melbourne as perth wankers show up en mass. Freo wins infront of 85,000. Camp ground owners make a killing.

I just want a flag.

Cant have it both ways

Freo is fine as they are locked in and have earnt top spot. Also their opponents cant move either. North winning or losing can affect 3 other teams. I call [censored]

the thing is, if the afl have been involved in deceptive conduct, it has been to PROTECT essendon. ringing them up to tell them theres an investigation? PROTECTING. kicking them out of finals as a result of bad governance? PROTECTING so that they can punish the club without punishing the players. ESSENDON are the ones who ran the black ops drug regime.

not arguing that it wasn't there as its currently written I'm saying that it shouldn't be written that way and that umpires shouldn't have to pay it gotta reward the bloke for getting to the footy first. wasn't like jones went with his feet first either!

that free kick against jones was everything that is wrong with AFL.

Stop blaming the players, this is all our fault

[censored] that. I'd love to see those drug cheats finish with 17 broken legs