45HG

It is great! Here's the link.

His! You're a serial offender HT. 75 points with a guilty plea, 1 match suspension if you challenge and lose.

Should I just copy-paste my previous post, or do you want me to write it out again for you?

Why is it anyone's business? There's nothing illegal/sinister about them.

Some people just shouldn't write articles.

Khawaja has been brought in to cover Ponting. I found this article rather amusing.

Thanks Tom!

I'm not actually Paul Gardner...or any member of the former board for that matter! There, it's out! Ah, I feel much better!

Yes...

That's cheating, girls usually get along with one another

Hrmm... it's more than a little frustrating that everyone is getting told different things.

It was also my birthday this year...

Someone's been having some fun! I reckon it's quality!

Some of the ones posted may have been sent out before they realised they were incorrect? It's just a very unfortunate situation in general I think. I'd be happy to get one of each at whatever price, but there aren't any home ones left. The communication aspect from the club is still what I'm disappointed about. I'd have though with twitter, facebook and members' email - something could've been said earlier.

FWIW the website says that the new guernseys will arrive in March - hopefully just in time for Round 1!

I dunno Doggo, I reckon they'd look pretty good on you...or were you not putting yourself in that latter category? B)

Still don't see how the two situations are connected...aside from the club and the sexual nature of the controversy.

To insinuate that any player who doesn't reach the level of James Hird is to be laughed at. It is ridiculous because, when he signed his contract, he was one of out best players. As an off-shoot of that, he was one of our highest paid. As a further extension, given the nature of the salary cap season, he will then naturally be amongst the top 50 or so paid of all clubs (top 3 of each). It becomes even more skewed when top clubs (the Geelongs etc.) need to spread the same coin amongst more players, meaning their top players are paid less. It irks me to say that a player such as Bruce has underperformed because of the money he was paid - he was paid what he was worth to the club, and a B&F and very consistent output would IMO justify that. Now, the fact that Bruce was one of our best players of the past few years highlights why we haven't made finals in that time, but that's beside the point. To claim that a player picked up at pick 64 and played over 200 games, vice captained the club and won a B&F disappointed or underperformed is ludicrous IMO. He got the best out of himself and his ability. To do less than this would be underperforming or disappointing.

His pay has nothing to do with retrospectively claiming he "under performed" - it's a ridiculous argument that I, and other, have covered (possibly in this thread). I've never been a massive "fan" of Cameron, but I'd probably argue that top 20% of the players of the last decade is about right for him anyway. As for your last sentence, should I have comment on it or...?

It's my understanding that these "defective" jumpers were being sold. I'd have thought that if you had a pre-order, you'd at least be able to have the first say whether you wanted them or not.

And pre-ordered jumpers that are given away when they come in.

Completely, 100% different situation.

Their website.

Modified.

I saw that in The Age, actually, and wondered if there would be controversy because they're revealing him before actually getting the signature!