Rhino Richards

I wouldnt say any more about the innings but lets mention the first ball again.....

I waded through the bile and it must really hurt to say "Good luck to Hussey". How even handed and thoughtful you are? That's the 3rd time... Thats worth a another pin surely. Neither would I expect you to Basil Fawlty. You never learn. And while you have been carping on all year, you have not, despite being asked repeatedly to say who you would have put in to replace Hussey. And you know what!! You scurried back under the stone and continue to put your pins into the selectors. Postscript: MEK Hussey c Cook b Finn 195 (495m 330b 26x4 1x6. The only thing that has been cod ordinary has been some of the appalling iand ignorant judgements you have tossed his way.

I'm bitter. I not the one who stick knives into public figures for the past 12 months without putting up any plausible alternative. This player who is 5th on the all time batting average for Australia has in the context of an important Ashes series comes into bat at a dicey 5/143 in difficult with his future in doubt and wingnuts like you slagging him off and has played a wonderful innings (maybe set the series up) and in his epic 300 ball plus innings all you can do is repeatedly focus on the first ball and rue the fact that he was lucky. Keep sticking the pins into the Mr Cricket doll. Once more the reality of the situation shows you up again....and again and again. As I write its now 5/446 and Hussey 186no. Partnership now 303 and growing.... Surely that worth another pin in the doll.

You are so pathetically predictable with your responses. Mr "list clogger" is 176 no. In Ashes history, its one of the great innings and partnerships (with Haddin who has been superb). You must be hating this given the silliness you have written here over the past 12 months. Any thought for the selectors who persevered with Hussey?? I bet its Greg Chappell's fault.

Was he the same source where you got the side strain information on Bollinger?

Like most of your responses.

Damn you with the facts HT! I told you I blame the selectors especially that know nothing Greg Chappell. Tactically inept he is. B) What rubbish. The issue is that he should not have been declared fit by the doctors/physio. If he was fit of course Clarke would be selected. He looked stiff batting today. I am glad you are educated enough to make statements about back injuries. Is there nothing you dont know? I would love to know what sought of tests were done on Clarke. North almost stamped his exit ticket. Swann must have bowled that delivery in his mind a 100 times in his sleep. Hussey played a good knock today. Attacked Swann early. Batted smart today. I hope he goes on. There may be some looking redfaced. Haddin struck the ball cleanly. Geez he does give it the full face of the bat. Tomorrow, England with the 2nd new ball should be a cracker contest.

The Captain is responsible for the use of his bowlers. He is responsible for over/underbowling his charges and should be recognised for his decisions when they go right as well. As you have agreed the 1st day was Australia's. Ponting deserves any more merit considering Johnson was poor and he had a first gamer in Doherty who did not let the side down. I was certainly not critical of your comments on the specific issue. I was not watching then. It more the tedious "experts" with their broadbrush criticism of tactics when they have shown they have neither the pedigree nor the knowledge to make a plausible judgement. Get my drift. B) And I blame Greg Chappell for this mess too.

The radio said repeatedly that Bollinger was declared fit for the game and that he has been replaced by Khawaja at the Test to allow Bollinger to play a shield game.

Its lucky he didn't win the toss. Ponting would have to get a big tick for bringing Siddle into the attack at 4/197. Could be one of the decisions that might influence the series. Up to then, Siddle aside and Hilfy's first over the bowling was nothing to write home about and I am not sure how you can knock the field when the bowlers generally bowled poorly. And I am glad you know more about tactics than a professional with 20 years first class experience. Its reassuring. And when a Captain has the oppposition out for 260 and his side 0/25 on the first day of the 1st Test in an Ashes Series, its fair to say he has won this round of the fight. Particularly when his opposite went for a 3rd ball duck. Telling blow. Ponting will have tougher days in the office and may deserve fair criticism for it. However he has landed a telling blow on England today (even with an ordinary Johnson) and should be given recognition for it Tomorrow is Round 2 and we will see what happens but if Australia can still be there are stumps then this is going to be a most difficult game for England. Any recognition for the selectors for backing Siddle over Bollinger? Hmmmm. Brave call for which they will never get due credit for.

He didn't. He sustained it in a meaningless friendly a week out from the Test. And as a contracted ACB player he has no choice but to play as required. I would have rather he got injured if at all actually in the preparation for something important. But not in mistimed, forgettable giggle game and on a green strip.

As expected they brought Khawaja in as an emergency. Fair enough. As for blooding young players I dont think they could have blooded Ferguson who was recovering from an ACL. They have already started blooding Khawaja by taking him to England when Australia played Pakistan. However what were Cricket Australia thinking when they decided to hold a Sunday night "jolly" 5 days before the 1st Test on a wet track. Reserve keepr Tim Paine is nursing a broken finger thanks to a fsst friendly from Dirk Nannes. Why was someone risked over a game so trivial? If Haddin were to tread on ball, pinch a muscle or buckle a finger, wehre would we be placed? Even worse Tim Paine loses valuable cricket time behind the stumps.

So how are the selectors to blame for point 5 given that always been your argument (which is carp anyway)? As you have been asked often and avoided which selections should have been made that would have changed the outcomes in point 5?

The Ashes tickets aren't selling as well as when or are we not selling them at all. If you actually do the research this Ashes tour is not a sell out like the last tour for a variety of reasons. 1. Ashes 2006-2007 had a magnificent build up following the fantastic 2005 Ashes tour. Australia finally had a challenger 2. At that time Australia was chock full of stars at their peak or about to leave the game at their highs.... Hayden, Langer, Warne, McGrath and Gilly. 3. Australia in four years has diminished as a Test playing nation as the unprecedented retirement of greats have left a talent void that is not easily replaced. The domestic competition has been threadbare with states like Qld, WA and SA barely competitive at times. 4. The emergence of 20/20 has turned the game for many stakeholders on its head. Its all bang and fizz but the game results are even more forgettable than ODI. For a nation that does like the enduring nature of Tests, the latest "innovation" has confused many people as to what the game is. 5. This Ashes series follows 12 months of meaningless cricket which has been racked by corruption, incompetence and instransigence at the global level. Out of the global game only Aust, England, South Africa and NZ have any integrity in their national structures. India now controls 75 to 80% of the global cricket game. The game's direction has splintered at the global level. Other nations are either chronically corrupt/ incompetent or both. Cricket Australia has floundered in some areas but the problems are often bigger than Australia. 6. The game is riddled with corruption at all levels internationally and it has damaged the cricket brand to the Australian consumer. 7. While there have been some close results, the quality of cricket has diminished globally. So there is an education for you to supplement the meagre 4 Corners insights that does you greater justice than the broad brush whinging you dress as opinion. You really need to move beyond the "things are bad so what I say must be right". Its the epitome of the self saucing ignorance that is a flagship of your paltry and uninformed contributions on this site.

I'm not the one making the grandiose claims about it heroboy. There are a number of reasons behind the fall in numbers from the past Ashes series in 2006-7. However that series was subject to special conditions leading up to its commencement. Last years cricket was also poorly attend. There will be a number of attributing factors including Australian team performance. Rather jump on a self indulgent soapbox putting some plausible and thoughtful ideas on how we can change things. You have not done that so far. Too busy bleating like a cut lamb.

If we lose the first test and he is not amongst the runs, I reckon he's out. The selectors have sent a definite shot across the bow to him. The century does not alter the shaking ground he is on.

Pity you shoot blanks. You dont know what attitude is behind the poor ticket sales this year. Your opinion is a perpetual whinge because when you aksed to substantiate you rely on generalisations, the views of family members ( ), continually avoiding questions and diverting the topic to somehow create a veneer of credibility. More like self saucing ignorance.

I dont care so long as he and other batsman makes runs when it counts. Its easy runs on a flat deck on a good day with no Siddle, McKay etc when you are 200 runs ahead. But if it bats him into form I dont mind. I wonder if the selectors had ruled him out of the final XI.

Greg Chappell??

Hussey will need the salt tablets if he gets to 50! For Australia A, given the England tail have rallied, there is no excuse for the top six to bat out the next day and half and put there names forward. There is no doubt there will stacks of opportunity this summer for those that make runs and take wickets when it counts the most...

On a more high brow note.... England tops 500, their tails wags, Bell nearly get a double ton......Not a good show at all by Australia A aspirants. (But its the selectors fault...no Cricket Australia's ) For a hit out with Test players and aspirants, the NSW v Tasmania game was a waste and a farce (400 runs and 40 wickets in under 3 days. Hardly good preparation there. WA belts Victoria....Mitchell Johnson on fire 121 not out and 5 for against the best in the Shield Comp....At least some good news!!!

Over the past twelve months, which spinner and which batsman should replace? No grey matter required to swing the axe. A bit of thought who the replacement is. And BTW, the wasted 12 months is certainly not being proven in Tasmania. hardly any Australia A player knocking the door down It would be wasted money. You have already said you wont be watching so why clog the discussion with your mindless whinging? And you repeatedly shown to lightweight in both substance and knowledge and on that basis your accusation at others of being "soft" should be really be turned on you.

For all your windbagging, you have not put up one plausible change to the Test squad in the past 12 months. No one is arguing things are not good. But your persistent sheep bleating without any thoughtful or sensible alternative makes your posts have all grunt of a talkback crank. And while you are at lets blame the Government as well. Lets get some big fish.

We have had that proven in spades again. Now if only Australia A had won the toss and batted ....

And given there was more less than an hour to go to stumps anyway how many overs would Sth Africa have bowled in that time with 4 quicks and one second string spinner? They would struggle Think man...dont just parrot others. You just get found out...again and again. It would seem that the 4 Corners is your only viable source of information. You are surely jesting that you were aghast at a Pakistan official who blatantly lied down the camera. It could well have been an Indian official. You really have no perception of the problems of sub continent cricket beyond your stated racial generalisations.The problem has always been at the top and you didnt realise it! FFS. Hilditch's ivory tower must be an adjoining one to yours. Did you get on talkback after the I/V and rant there?