7 hours ago, Skuit said:

That Hawks team already belongs to a different era with far less pressure being applied to the contest - more space for the kicker and less need to take riskier options to clear the congestion.

All teams since the 90s have also looked to attack off half-back, and supporters of all teams since forever think that their team's skills are the worst. We rank ninth for turnovers (or seventh for the least turnovers) while Richmond rank as the fifth worst and Carlton the third best.

Meanwhile, we're one of the best teams for creating opposition turnovers, and are the highest scoring team in the league, due in part to prioritising players with contested skills over foot-skills. 

Are Carlton third best because they never have the ball?

What is their turnover to possession ratio?

7 hours ago, Skuit said:

No wonder we can't follow instructions with that hand-writing. 

It looks like a GP wrote it.

Talls sparleus/sparticus . or is it another language for "talls: anyone got any ideas we can use?"

Wizard att(ack): has anyone told Goodwin we don't have Farmer anymore?

Or is it Wizard ANB? If so I think they're overestimated ANBs wizard-ness.

3 hours ago, timbo said:

It looks like a GP wrote it.

Talls sparleus/sparticus . or is it another language for "talls: anyone got any ideas we can use?"

Wizard att(ack): has anyone told Goodwin we don't have Farmer anymore?

Or is it Wizard ANB? If so I think they're overestimated ANBs wizard-ness.

Mrs Frankie - a GP, would take offense - she has much better handwriting than I do! 
That would be an interesting list - best -> worst handwriting.

Mrs Franke, the GP would be at one end, and I would be at the other... not a GP!