Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'coaches'.
Found 2 results
-
Coaches are so predictable. Brad Scott wants to increase the interchange to five and dump the sub. No surprise there and another example of why coaches should not have control of the rules of the game. I would suggest the game would be much better off if we keep four on interchange and either dump the sub altogether or go back to last year's iteration where it was supposed to be for injury only. I would change it though, so that the player subbed off must miss the following game his team plays. No exemptions, even if the next game is the Grad Final. The moment you provide exemptions, it will be rorted. Nothing surer. https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/it-just-makes-sense-essendon-coach-wants-sub-scratched-for-five-on-the-bench-20230409-p5cz4e.html
-
Great article outlining the new football department structure for 2016. http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-10-09/dees-announce-new-football-structure The article also has an enlightening interview with Josh Mahoney (Widely seen as one of the rising stars in football admin, and you can see why.) Essentially, we're beefing up our development and gameplan areas, as well as undertaking an annual review of requirements in the coaching ranks, with the relevant staff having input on this (the senior coaching staff structure). I see this continuous review as a massive upside, as I've said in a few threads over the past few months. The club looks to be ticking all of the right boxes as far as the off-field requirements go, with appropriate allocation of resources. The next step is the on-field part. Hopefully the constant mis-steps are a thing of the past. At least the football conversations are coming from the appropriate channels now, unlike under previous administrations.
- 19 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- coaches
- josh mahoney
- (and 1 more)
