Lucifers Hero

Is something missing from the post ... ... or is this a new quiz 🤔

iirc Graham was McLaughlin's preferred CEO when we appointed Pert. Has good AFL HQ experience and highly credentialled. Graham has been involved in the football industry for nearly two decades, contributing across a range of strategy, operational, and leadership roles, including Strategy Manager, Manager of Club Services, General Manager Strategy, CEO of NSW/ACT, AFL General Manager of Game Development, and General Manager of Tasmania Expansion. graham-claims-2024-graeme-samuel-scholarship Knowing one's way around AFL HQ is critical for a club CEO. tbh, would much prefer Graham to McCarthey who imv has a narrow experience base in many respects. Too much 'learning on the job' required.

Both McStay and Daicos received 5 votes and the above assumes it was Daicos 5/0 and McStay 2/3 but could have been the opposite ie Coach 1. 5 McStay 4 Houston 3 Sidebottom 2 Daicos 1 Membrey Coach 2. 5 Houston 4 Sidebottom 3 Daicos 2 Rozee 1 Lipinski According to the stats (which I know aren't teh be all, end all), McStay had a phenomenal game so I can see the 5/0 scenario. It is anyone's guess which coach was McRae or Hinkley - I could make a case either way. It is also anyone's guess the mix for McStay and Daicos 5 votes. Coll fans are too blind to see any sort of common sense let alone be rational.

Thanks. I hadn't seen it reported as a spider bite ... not that it would mean much to me. Necrosis and amputation is dead set scary - hope he looks after himself.

Didn't Windsor miss a few weeks of preseason with a foot infection? Would welcome a medico giving some insight into why this would take so long to heal then come back again some weeks later. Hopefully it isn't like Oliver's infected foot in 2023 that just went on and on and landed him in hospital. Sheesh! Don't antibiotics work any more 🤷‍♀️ We need some luck on the injury front!!🙏

We can only know the shape of the votes as per the opening post. As to which coach voted a certain way is a guess. In this case the shape of the votes is correct but the attributed votes to Kingsley/Goodwin could be the other way round with no favoritism or leniency. I notice the coaches gave the same votes to Greene (5) and Green(3) and both coaches gave votes to Callaghan and Trac. For mine that is a very similar view of the game.

Something that cost us was not having someone on the goal line. They got 3-4 scappy goal as a result - at least 2 from Cogniglio could have been stopped had we had someone behind the pack.

Yep, in the Grand Final... ... we will atone those losses.

The 'Kids/Debs': Goals: 1 – Windsor 1 – Roo 1 – Sharp 2 – Jeffo 1 – Henderson 1 – AJ Lindsay: D: 22, T: 6, Eff: 81.2% Langford: Not on field for long. I said earlier in the week if we lost it wouldn't be for the kids/debs. In fact they kept us int he game. They did their job superbly.

Proud!

The club could lobby the AFL. The AFL give a leg up to the big Vic clubs in so may ways. Wouldn't hurt to help the smaller ones. On balance the gate takings would be higher as adults bringing the kids would pay and it would be better viewing on tv with more people/noise. Can't see a downside.

Last year kids entered free for the WCE afternoon game. Great turnout on trains and atmosphere at the ground. I reckon kids should get in free for all MCG games vs i/state teams especially day games. Kids come with parents thereby increasing the adult numbers. And kids can make a lotta noise!

No need to take one line and nit pick it. Read it in context of the rest of the post...

Windsor maybe. JVR will be 22 in a few weeks. Remember that Pickett, Jackson, Bowey, Rivers, Petty, Sparrow, Spargo were all premiership players when between 18 and 21 years of age. I agree we have some youth tomorrow but I reckon that is a ok. If we lose it won't be because of the debs.

Only Langford and Lindsay are 18/19. Jefferson is 21. The rest of the team have been in the VFL/AFL system for at least several years. Long enough to physically develop and perform a role albeit not expected to star. Just do the role and that is enough while the 3 true debutants learn.

Yes, I'd rather give the newbies a go than play those not ready or tried before that you meniton. For mine the experience of Johnson, Henderson and Sharp to some extent balances out the inexperience of Langford, Linsay and Jefferson who will probably play limited minutes. I like that these guys a getting a go as we don't have a lot of depth in our injury list that can come in this year: McVee, Pickett, Tholstrop and maybe Melksham. So getting games into the debs is a good thing. We will need them to play during the year.

I loath Ess soooooooooo much I don't care who beats them!

Wizard, are you DD's Mum ... 😊

You could give her a hug and tell her.😉 Failing that, Mother's Day will be here soon 😊

Goodwin said three or four to debut. I'm guessing it will be three: Langford, Lindsay, Jefferson or Johnson. As Johnson played in Freo game he is the more likely and perhaps Jefferson as an emergency.

None of the articles say the time Maynard's 'accident' happened. Last time he crashed his car it was 6.00am. Is the media protecting that scum species again!

Some new faces this week. Goodwin: “I think we’ve probably got four or five guys that are new to our footy club that are pressing for selection. But I think we’ll end up having three or four guys come Friday, that’ll find their way into the team for the first time, which I think is exciting for the Melbourne supporters,” Goodwin said on Thursday. “We’ve got Aidan Johnson, [Matt] Jefferson, you know, then [Harvey] Langford and [Xavier] Lindsay are all in the mix for selection. That should give Kingsley something to think about! If nothing else we won't be predictable new-look-demons-to-play-three-or-four-debutants-in-round-one Despite the weather hope everyone gets to the G to give those guys a roaring welcome to our club. And to the debutantes: Have fun guys, do us proud!

I'm still very optimistic about this game. They beat us by 2 points in rain soaked Alice in 2023 when the score line was 7.5 to our 5.15. They were lucky Lever had a brain fade in the last minutes, didn't man the mark and let Kelly kick a 60m goal. So I wouldn't think they are much better than us playing when wet. Last year they beat us by 2 points again in 2024 with a score line of 13.7 to our 12.11 at the G. Their midfield were very good but we had no Petracca, an underdone Oliver and Viney was having a poor patch of form. Of their 2024 team Hogan, Perryman, Peating, Briggs and maybe Green won't be there. We will be missing a few, namely Pickett and to a lesser extent McVee and ANB but have Oliver and Petracca back. It is a shame Melksham isn't playing as he is very good as a 'defensive forward/decoy' to take Taylor away from the play. Not sure we have anyone else that is respected enough that Taylor has to follow. It will be close but don't fear them at all.

Yes, that is my reservation; just not sure he is a 'team' first player. And we now have Langford; not quite in the same class as Harley but potentially just as valuable. This year will tell us a lot about his character.

I think that is 80,000 for the game vs Richmond. Probably much lower than prior years Round 1.