olisik

Bastinac and pick 12

If we draft Tyler Roos I doubt Paul will be taking off to Hawaii in 2 years. We can offer him a 100k contract and do the opposite GWS did with the Scullies

He may as well be the skinniest and made of ceramic with the amount of injuries he gets.

Well 2 years ago was Wines playong with smaller bodies and Toump playing with similair bodies. Few years earlier was Darling playing with a bigger body and Cook with average body. Same goes for Watts and Hurley. I would prefer the bigger body this time. They seem to make the transition into AFL much better.

Bp would draft Pickett(player comparison Jetta) as #1 and Goddard(player comparison Jack Watts) as 2.

Was probably Jack Watts

We should make a play for Ollie if we get top picks.

Sounds like Pavlich

Always a good laugh

I am not trying to say Tyson has been bad, what I am saying is we need a superstar who can influence games. Past few years we have kept targetting hardworking mids in Toumpas Viney Salem Tyson, Matt Jones, Magner, Couch, Cross, Vince ect Its about time we go for a player who goes in hard both inside and out and has the x factor to influence a game rather then just keep us in the game and our head above water. We had 2 chances to get this kid but instead we took a forward who hasnt played a game of AFL in 2 years and another hardworking midfielder to keep our head above water. Also if Viney and co rated Salem above Kelly then I have my concerns with the recruiting department..

Kelly carved us up yesterday, his touches were all influential and the impact he had on the game as a first yr player was huge. None of this "younger players tiring from a long year" excuse we seem to be hearing at the MFC.

Tyson is good and tries hard but he will never have the x factor and ability to turn the tide of a game the way Kelly will. Salem struggles to get a touch. Has he had any games where he has reached double digit posessions?

We ll trade the pick away again like we did with the Dom Tyson for Kelly trade. Damn Kelly looked the goods yesterday.

It being a better pick doesnt make it a 2 for 1. It was comparison to Vince and Kelly for Tyson and Salem.

Its the difference between trading J kelly for Tyson and Salem or Vince and Kelly for Tyson and Salem. It was not 2 for 1 and people got to get that through theyre heads

2nd round pick is significant, your kidding yourself if you think elsewise. Dont get me started on what players the game has which were 2nd round picks.

Twist it how you like. I counted 2 picks and counted we got back 2 players. An 11 pick upgrade is hardly worth completly discounting our 2nd pick was part of the deal.

Hogan and barry for pick 3 and 13? Thats 2 for 2

Tyson deal wasnt 2 for 1. It wss 2 for 2

Big question is where would BP rate these kids? Once we work that out then we do the opposite ans we are sweet

GWS would need to add something else in otherwise the trade would be of no benefit for St Kilda and lots of benefit for GWS.

Why would St Kilda want Boyd over Mcartin?

Doing well in the SANFL means nothing.

No need to be so narky...I didnt say it will change everything so dont put words in my mouth. Having no nomination indicates that we have no new young players making the same impact that other clubs young players are to warrant a nomination.

2 players wont get us far. Need more