Jump to content

PaulRB

Life Member
  • Posts

    4,583
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by PaulRB

  1. How could the Pies get Treloar, Howe, etc... pickwise?
  2. The Age reporting deal for Kennedy to Melbourne almost done... http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/afl-trade-period-2015-day-two-20151012-gk7h5z.html
  3. Why would we not be in the conversation for Treloar? Agree we don't seem to be, curious as to why?
  4. I have the feeling that Howe to GC is our best opportunity to land a big fish, either directly with GC or via accumulating picks to then trade to Syd or GWS who have quality academy kids (and F/S) to pay for... Mind you, it depends on your definition of a big fish. Is a player who comes in and within a couple of years wins our B&F a "big fish"? If so, Vince was one... and another may not be as hard as we think.
  5. Long way to go this trade season, only Day 1, big fish require patience and a strategy. We can only wait and see what our FD can do.
  6. True. Not completed, I stand corrected.
  7. If the Cats can get Clark firing they'll have another tilt or two in them. Unfortunately.
  8. Mate, Its Day 1 of the trade period! Yet you're claiming that we won't land a big fish? based on what? Then, you claim inside knowledge of the priorities of the FD. My claim about Melksham being "a priority" is based on the FACT that they targeted him weeks ago (publicly) and pushed through getting him on Day 1. You're quite strange.
  9. It's evident that Milksham was targeted by the FD as a priority get, most likely several months ago, to fill a specific role in the structure that they are building. After the wins of recruiting last year and just acknowledging the professionalism by which Roos, Goodwin, Viney etc... go about selecting players to bring into the club, I've got confidence this deal will be good for us.
  10. Based on the length of this thread (49 pages) compared to the length of the Dangerfield thread (169 pages) and given what the cats gave up for Dangerfield (1st Round + 2nd Round + 3rd round player) seems we got an OK deal for Melksham. Welcome to the MFC Jake...
  11. Cant we just run an automated search and replace with the next A-grade player's name who becomes "available", and save ourselves from repeating another 168 pages of wishful thinking?
  12. Given the inside knowledge on Melksham that both Goodwin and McCartney have, I'll back them to make this deal good for us.
  13. Given the inside knowledge on Melksham that both Goodwin and McCartney have, I'll back them to make this deal good for us.
  14. Not necessarily our first second rounder...
  15. Be great if we had!
  16. Maybe not... and don't call me Shirley.
  17. Depends on how you look at it
  18. Jeremy is starting to get on my nerves. Feels like he's burt his bridges but continues to play coy...
  19. Good they got that deal out of the way in the first couple of hours, more will flow...
  20. Doubt we'd take all those picks to the draft as we've already indicated Milksham and Bugg... with others mooted...
  21. Tha seems like a fair deal for the Crows... given the alternative was pick 14 OR zero.
  22. Struggling to keep track of the speculated out trades... Howe - GWS Pick 6 upgrade to pick 3 plus Pick 22 Watts - Freo Pick 16 Toupas - Port pick 27 (second round!) Dawes - ?? Grimes - ?? If all go through Out: Pick 6, Howe, Watts, Toumpas, Dawes, Grimes. IN: Pick 3, Pick 16, Pick 22, pick 27, pick ??, pick ??
  23. Any chance we could get pick 3 and keep pick 6? Ie Howe and pick 16 (Watts to Freo) for pick 3...
  24. Brayshaw is the best first year mid I've seen at MFC for at least ten years. Petracca we shall have to see, but those who should know gush "Hogan like" about his talents and potential...
  25. Do GC have any kids coming through their academy next year? May be Howe and a second round pick in 2016 for pick 10 (2015)?
×
×
  • Create New...