Jump to content

monoccular

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by monoccular

  1. monoccular replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Ah, the joys of hindsight ๐Ÿ™„
  2. Thanks DD - agree with most of that summation Verrall is a second year tall ruck - Max I don't think (yes, also injured) a go for 3 years or so and he has gone OK. Throwing him to the wolves is not necessarily a great idea (though I did think a bench role against an "easy beat" like WCE ๐Ÿ˜ฎ may have been worth a try)
  3. Did they define the best kick inside 50? Was it the best kick from inside 50 or the best kick into inside 50? I would probably agree ANB into but would bank Frittata from inside 50
  4. Kneejerk, or remove the knee? I guess they do that because they, the professionals, feel that "coming back through Casey" does not prepare them properly. defenders surely cannot just leave their opponent or position in the defensive unit, to do a bit of ruck work. So who, other than Max, in your plan, will relieve Max? You won't go to the footy because Billings is playing? Sorry WERRIDEE, but what sort of true supporter of our beloved footy club and team doesn't attend because a particular player is selected? Are you serious?
  5. So, question. If every player carrying an injury is rested, and every player returning from injury comes via Casey, then we will need to play a 10 man side. T McD I believe has been quoted as saying he will not be played forward as his foot / ankle limitations prevents him from running on a lead or flying for a mark. Yes, if that is the case maybe he shouldn't be playing, but as above who can we play in his place? Second year in a row we have scored a succession of unrelated injuries to most of our tall forward options and many of our tall backs. Someone has to run out onto the field for us. Who?
  6. I don't believe we get a replacement for a suspended player. Justice delayed is justice denied. Chinese swimmers of course get a very quick hearing.
  7. Which would mean that Angusโ€™ assailant would never play again which would nearly be justice
  8. Woey was one of few half decent players and you want to drop him ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
  9. Do you mean on the field, or on this thread?
  10. OUT Lever (concussion) Billings BBB McAdam IN Tomlinson Langdon JVR Fullarton. (Woewoden into the 22) Tempting to bring in Kolt but not sure for whom
  11. 6 ANB 5 KOZZIE 4 FRITTATA 3 CP5 2 MAX 1 JV7 The last 3 were harder to find
  12. It is t TMc who chooses the match up. Which match up would you choose given that Lever is out?
  13. So 3x โ€œnot 15โ€ for us then a 10 meter mark deep defence to them.
  14. Alternatives given lack of depth?
  15. Cripps (CFC) and Reid have special rules.
  16. The โ€œboosโ€ are back with a vengeance.
  17. Stigga - I guess according to the original poster that makes him fragile ๐Ÿ™„ The curse of Naarm Smith returns.
  18. Thanks for the history lesson Eagles have done at least 4 incorrect disposals / throws not penalised. And why do the umpires try to coach? If thee is a block, penalise it and the message will get through.
  19. One question about the two jurisdictions. IF he were to get 6 weeks would that be for 6 VFL Swans matches - given their recurring bloody byes that could well be 8 AFL matches? When Wojinski (?spelling) broke JV7โ€™s jaw in VFL he and Geelong seemed to weasel one week or more of his suspension due to the AFL team having a bye or maybe vice versa.
  20. Alistair Clarkson?
  21. monoccular replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Only if say the western suburban team that plays some games at Ballarat were to relocate. Could still be called Goldfield Western Bulldogs And as for a 20th team ๐Ÿ˜ฎ๐Ÿค—๐Ÿ˜ก further diluting the talent pool ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ฑ
  22. Maybe Hunter is considering a career change ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿค”
  23. โ€œIf you go down to the woods today youโ€™re sure of a big surprise โ€ฆ.โ€ Are you suggesting a Teddy Bearsโ€™ picnic?
  24. What do we really know about him and his goals? Does he actually want to play AFL?